Members g.smith Posted July 13, 2014 Members Share Posted July 13, 2014 i bought a Yamaha MX61 a few months ago, and while a number of the presets are quite acceptable, many of the orchestral voices have, regrettably, been sampled with (what i consider to be) an excessive amount of vibrato which cannot be overridden . additionally, i've been both perplexed and frustrated by some of the stereo/panning schemes assigned to some of the instruments, especially when i want to use, for example, a cello melody and it jumps back and forth from left to right. in spite of a panning control, this issue cannot be corrected …just moves everything further left or right together. i'm considering the Kurzweil PCK36 because of its longstanding reputation for quality orchestral voices, but i'm hoping to determine whether it would afford the flexibility/adjustability to avoid the above described issues i've experienced with the Yamaha. any pertinent info. anyone could provide would be much appreciated! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members keybdwizrd Posted July 16, 2014 Members Share Posted July 16, 2014 Before giving up on the MX, you might want to visit the Motifator forums, where they even have a forum dedicated to the MX instruments here. I know that the MX is the entry level model in Yamaha's lineup, but I'd be surprised if you couldn't make the tweaks that you want. FYI, I haven't spent much time there, but I believe that you can get help from official Yamaha product people there, such as a guy with the moniker "Bad Mister." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AnotherScott Posted July 17, 2014 Members Share Posted July 17, 2014 John Melas' MX Tools and/or the Vycro MX Performance Editor may help you get what you want out of the MX. The PC3K6 is designed to be much more editable out of the box (as are the higher end Yamahas like MOXF and Motif XF). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.