Jump to content

hybridstudios

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Story Comments posted by hybridstudios

  1. It's sad how LANDR markets their services. They exist to

    provide a convenient way to master music; emphasis being convenience not

    quality. In this press release they're talking about using machine learning to

    improve the mastering...so doesn't that mean if the algorithm is constantly be

    improved, than any current version of the software would be inferior to the

    next version? The problem is that LANDR uses a systematic set of processes,

    it's software. The question must be asked, can computers make artistic

    choices? I personally don't think so and think artists/music consumers would be

    surprised to hear the LANDR (computer algorithm) master against an experienced

    human mastering engineer. There are creative choices that are created by the

    existence of a collaboration; mastering is not just a formula that can be done

    to a song. I'd be happy to do a sample mastering for anyone interested in doing

    a listening test between a human and computer. If interested please contact me

    at https://www.hybridstudiosca.com/mastering/. There's a reason why

    commercially successful songs use a human mastering engineer, because sometimes

    quality is more important than convenience.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...