Jump to content

Synful - A replacement for the Yamaha VL?


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I've looked at it. It's an amazing piece of work.

 

I don't know where it fits in. It's kind of like a VL replacement, but also kind of like a synthesized orchestral sample library.

 

That Beethoven piece contained the best synthesized strings I've ever heard. I thought the trumpet was kind of lacking, though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

i'm not sure i get it.

 

i like the fact that the sound generation is based on additive principles, but they refer to it as not using notes, but phrases.

the transition between notes goes through some kind of interpolation process (adjusting amplitude and pitch envelopes of partials maybe?).

the process sounds a bit too much like working with looped material, but in the form of phrases.

maybe i'm reading it wrong?:

 

http://www.synful.com/RPM.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think you're close Mildbill. They're using sampled phrases and computer algorithms to splice one note to the next note in a sampled phrase. It can be looked at as loops with single note transitional blending.

 

The demos sound nice, but I'm not sure if I'd ever use it. Still, I'll give them an A for originality.

 

I'd be interesting to see the same technology applied to PCM sounds so that you could build seemless bass and rhythm guitar tracks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very interesting. Given the price of the nicer Orchestral sampling sets, I wouldnt think they are asking too much at all. I like the concept- feed simple midi in and get sample articulation back.... one of the things i like about my V-Drums module.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I almost bought this (and I probably will). From what I've heard and studied, Synful is very cool. It impresses me that additive partials and a simple control scheme can sound so good.

 

Back in this old thread, I posed the idea of a workstation using high end (Vienna, East/West, etc.) instrument section samples, along with Synful's solo instrument expressiveness. I think the combination of samples and Synful would be fantastic.

 

Synful on a workstation

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I too think the combination of samples with some kind of resynthesis is the way to go.

 

My favourite flugelhorn patch comes from the original Yamaha MOTIF... none of the VL sounds I've come across come anywhere near it... would love to hear how a combination of sampling and synthesis coould improve this...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by Mike Conway

Back in this old thread, I posed the idea of a workstation using high end (Vienna, East/West, etc.) instrument section samples, along with Synful's solo instrument expressiveness. I think the combination of samples and Synful would be fantastic.

 

 

There was a lot of interest in this product about a year ago over at some of the composer forums. The general consensus was:

-- it can be helpful as a supplement to existing orchestral sample libraries

-- the price is a little too high for the limited number of instruments available.

 

You can download a PC or Mac demo version and test it out yourself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IIRC Synful is not primarily a performance instrument (whereas the Yamaha VL very much is) It really comes into its own if you give it a midi FILE, rather than real time data.

 

It will use look-ahead in order to generate appropriate phrasing.

 

When used in real time, you must either disable the look-ahead system, and the sophisticated phrasing, or you must work with a one second delay. Note: this has nothing to do with normal soft-synth lag, and does not go away with a faster computer. It needs the delay so it knows which note is coming next, and can pick an appropriate way to connect the previous.

 

So no, it is not a replacement for the VL. The VL is a performance instrument. Synful is a non-real-time scoring aid.

 

-Ron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Originally posted by rpieket

IIRC Synful is not primarily a performance instrument (whereas the Yamaha VL very much is) It really comes into its own if you give it a midi FILE, rather than real time data.


It will use look-ahead in order to generate appropriate phrasing.


When used in real time, you must either disable the look-ahead system, and the sophisticated phrasing, or you must work with a one second delay. Note: this has nothing to do with normal soft-synth lag, and does not go away with a faster computer. It needs the delay so it knows which note is coming next, and can pick an appropriate way to connect the previous.


So no, it is not a replacement for the VL. The VL is a performance instrument. Synful is a non-real-time scoring aid.


-Ron.

 

Thanks Ron. I was really thinking about getting hold of this and selling the VL, but now you just made my mind up for me.

 

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
Guest Anonymous

 

Originally posted by orangefunk

Has anyone checked out Synful?




The demo mp3s
seem like it offer a modern day replacement for the Yamaha VL stuff.


Seems expensive though...

 

 

I've got it, it's amazing.

 

Synful is the best orch software i've tried. You can play and record real time or for more expression there is a slight delay.

 

If you want something to replace your VL though, try AAS string studio, it sounds far more VL authentic, screaming guitars, bright acoustic bass, even does unique synth sounds including pads.

 

Try the demo

 

http://www.applied-acoustics.com/stringstudio.htm

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by Plastic Baby

Synful is the best orch software i've tried. You can play and record real time or for more expression there is a slight delay.

 

 

So the real time results are still pretty good? Rpieket's one second delay comment kind of put me off. I checked out the MP3s for this, more than a year ago. I was astounded! Again, good for lead instruments. Use samples for sectionals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

 

Originally posted by Mike Conway



So the real time results are still pretty good? Rpieket's one second delay comment kind of put me off. I checked out the MP3s for this, more than a year ago. I was astounded! Again, good for lead instruments. Use samples for sectionals.

 

 

Real time playing is just like any softsynth.

 

There is a feature that needs a second to calculate the most realistic sound characteristics of a real orchestra, bending of notes and things like that, but you don't have to use it, the sounds are amazing just playing it like a normal softsynth.

 

This software has impressed me so much i'm building a system around it. I've only had it 24 hours but i already know the possibilities.

 

Expect some experimental demos from me in a few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

 

Originally posted by BillyWa

A little off the side question. How does the Yamaha VL plg card compare to these other synths? Or the VL-70m?

 

 

I'm not sure why Orangefunk compared Synful Orch and the VL, like i said earlier, i'd recommend AAS String software for that.

 

The VL synths do sound fantastic, you really need to try one to understand how special those synths are. The VL Plug is similar to the VL70m in that they don't sound as full as the keyboard versions. The keyboard versions have stunning fx and a few extra features that make all the difference.

 

I really do recommend VL owners to check out the AAS String software, you'd think it was all Yamaha making the sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

The lower end VLs sound a bit like 12 bit samples v 16 bits. Only the VL1, VL1m and VL7 sound full... funnily enough I think the VL engine in the EX5 combined with the AWM made for some nice flugelhorn patches that the VL1 and Co. can't do... this lead to my conviction that perhaps a combination of the two techniques might be a good way to go... i.e. samples for realistic tone, synthesis for the expressiveness...

 

PB. I compared the VL with Synful because both try to model real instruments... having played the demo of Synful via an EMU XBoard 49 it seems that the sounds are a bit thinner and it may require a lot of learning in terms of the actual instrument and its characteristics, new keyboard technique, wheels and pedals, mappings and so on... just like the VL in fact... :D

 

Its an interesting area, no one has quite cracked it yet I don't think.. certainly for the live player there is a bit of a gap in immediacy. Although the demos are pretty cool at the site, I suspect that they are the result of extensive post editing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

 

Originally posted by orangefunk



Its an interesting area, no one has quite cracked it yet I don't think.. certainly for the live player there is a bit of a gap in immediacy. Although the demos are pretty cool at the site, I suspect that they are the result of extensive post editing...

 

 

I agree, it's an interesting area of synthesis, interests me far more than virtual analog.

 

Have you tried AAS String? in my opinion it's as close to a VL7 in software as you're going to get, there are programming differences but i've recreated many of my favourite VL7 sounds. The presets only hint at what's possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by Plastic Baby



I agree, it's an interesting area of synthesis, interests me far more than virtual analog.


Have you tried AAS String? in my opinion it's as close to a VL7 in software as you're going to get, there are programming differences but i've recreated many of my favourite VL7 sounds. The presets only hint at what's possible.

 

 

Not yet, I will do though when I have more time. I never used the VL stuff for strings at all, I'm more into horns and saxes.... the Saxlab stuff didn't get me....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Anonymous

 

Originally posted by orangefunk



Not yet, I will do though when I have more time. I never used the VL stuff for strings at all, I'm more into horns and saxes.... the Saxlab stuff didn't get me....

 

 

Don't let the name "AAS string" fool you, not meant to be orch strings, it's more for guitars and harps, things like that and like VL it has that high sparkle clear bright VL character, i only got it a few days ago but the screaming guitars, synth bass and plucked harps remind me of the VL, in many ways i think it sounds better than the VL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

IMHO, the musician validates the sound, the style, and ultimately the instrument. Not the reverse....

 

I've heard phenominal musicians take a patch and an instrument that I thought was useless, and made absolute gold out of it, leaving me wide eyed and mouth agape to wonder http://acapella.harmony-central.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=1321091

:eek:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...