Gus Lozada Posted April 5, 2009 Share Posted April 5, 2009 NOTE: I MOVED IN HERE ALL THE RANTS FROM THE ORIGINAL THREAD, INCLUDING MINE. ******** At a first glance, it would not make any sense to "compare" two synths which are THAT different. Much less an exhaustive comparison. ... anyway, I'll read the article as soon as I have some more time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juno6 Posted April 5, 2009 Members Share Posted April 5, 2009 At a first glance, it would not make any sense to "compare" two synths which are THAT different. Much less an exhaustive comparison.... anyway, I'll read the article as soon as I have some more time. That Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Lozada Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 That Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juno6 Posted April 5, 2009 Members Share Posted April 5, 2009 And that's what I call "too much time in your hands" Look at how many post do we have on this forum and see who Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Lozada Posted April 5, 2009 Author Share Posted April 5, 2009 Look at how many post do we have on this forum and see who Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Real MC Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Trollbait. Prejudice accusations are shaming language and will not work here. The experts know it is futile to compare a polyphonic against a monophonic. You might as well compare a home organ against a flute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Hamburglar Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Trollbait. Prejudice accusations are shaming language and will not work here. Just an awful, awful post, the part above in particular. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Real MC Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Just an awful, awful post, the part above in particular. Yeah? The truth hurts, don't it? If that same "scientific comparision" were posted to the experts at Analogue Heaven (of which yours truly is a veteran), it would shot down faster and harder. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members juno6 Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Hey guys, what are you talking about? I just don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AfroRouge Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 I think the synth elitists are giving your enthusiastic effort an extremely rude reception. I'm also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Lozada Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 Once Javier missed the fact I was just playing the "captain obvious" card and felt attacked, I decided not to post anymore. I am ok with the fact some of you found the comparison useful, tough. To each its own, but I don't see how posting the most obvious comment a person could make regarding a comparison between synths so dissimilar may be a reprehensible conduct and a disgrace for a forum. I guess the "haters" are the others out there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members xmlguy Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Once Javier missed the fact I was just playing the "captain obvious" card and felt attacked, I decided not to post anymore. I am ok with the fact some of you found the comparison useful, tough. To each its own, but I don't see how posting the most obvious comment a person could make regarding a comparison between synths so dissimilar may be a reprehensible conduct and a disgrace for a forum. I guess the "haters" are the others out there He had a right to feel attacked, because you attack his efforts without even giving him the benefit of ACTUALLY READING what he said. He even posted a Google translate link. You could take the time to attack his effort but not even click on a link. So then you assert that everyone else but you are haters. Do you actually do around here but post BS. I searched out all your recent posts and I went through pages and pages of BS. His one article is more useful than ANYTHING I've ever seen you post. How many synth comparisons have you posted with audio samples, huh? You seem to spend more time posting to the HAI GUYS thread than anything else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Lozada Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 bla bla bla Given you do not want private messages: I'd suggest you to read my posts at the Spanish Forum and google whatever article I've written for serious publications -unless, of course, you don't consider Keyboard or EQ serious mags -. ... now, can you say the same about your work and credibility? I'd suggest you to stop being the usual troll you are with me -wherever you like it or not being called a troll- and try to get along while ignoring me. Otherwise, I won't care you go ballistic over me and troll me at all the other forums you visit -as you threatened me a while ago- and will simply ban you from here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Hamburglar Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Gus, get over yourself and admit you're just terrible in this thread, thx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gus Lozada Posted April 6, 2009 Author Share Posted April 6, 2009 Gus, get over yourself and admit you're just terrible in this thread, thx. I admit I stated the obvious without reading the obvious. Tasteless for some, I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members xmlguy Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 I don't give a damn where else you post or write. YOUR posts HERE in KSS are the only relevant issue I brought up. OF COURSE you threaten to ban me and call me a troll. Everybody's a hater and a troll but you. OF COURSE, you completely ignore every valid point I make and replace it with "bla bla bla" because you refuse to acknowledge anything I actually said. You like to send me private messages, and then cry like a baby when I post them verbatim in my sig. That's why I refuse to directly answer your private messages. You threatened to ban me for quoting your private message in my sig - and you threatened to remove it yourself. That's why I said I would quote what you wrote to me in private. I was only exposing what YOU POSTED TO ME by PM. If you are ashamed of what you write to me in private, then maybe you shouldn't write it in the first place. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members The Hamburglar Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 You're the worst. EDIT: Gus, not xmlguy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members stikygum Posted April 6, 2009 Members Share Posted April 6, 2009 Here we go again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members greaseenvelope Posted April 7, 2009 Members Share Posted April 7, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.