Members Antman261 Posted March 6, 2007 Members Share Posted March 6, 2007 Hey, I've noticed that some sources seem more sensitive to EQ then others. Sometimes cutting out 2db will make more of a difference then other times. Things like that. Now it seems to me, that this generally happens on sourcefiles that already sound good. How do you do it? Why does it happen? Why does having a great sounding recorded source make for sensitive EQ and is there anything particular about the way it's recorded that makes for this situation?.. AUUHH!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members UstadKhanAli Posted March 6, 2007 Members Share Posted March 6, 2007 A great sounding recording gives you more to work with? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Antman261 Posted March 6, 2007 Author Members Share Posted March 6, 2007 But I mean, why are changes in EQ more pronounced in 'better' sounding sounds? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Zooey Posted March 7, 2007 Members Share Posted March 7, 2007 But I mean, why are changes in EQ more pronounced in 'better' sounding sounds? You can't cut or boost what isn't there. Maybe what you perceive as "better" sounds are sounds that have a fuller frequency range. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Antman261 Posted March 7, 2007 Author Members Share Posted March 7, 2007 Hmm true, so basically, I need to work on getting a flatter response from the room? So there's less unusual peaks and trough's in the response of the sounds I'm recording? If I move the instrument closer to a wall, do I raise the frequency at which waves will start bouncing back from that wall and arriving back at the mic' 180 degrees out of phase? But to a degree this could leave me with an abundance of bass in comparison to high end yes? So I might be better off trying to stop reflections all together? Which means spending a kazillion dollars on acoustic treatment and a lot of time? Hmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members flatfinger Posted March 7, 2007 Members Share Posted March 7, 2007 Hey,I've noticed that some sources seem more sensitive to EQ then others. Sometimes cutting out 2db will make more of a difference then other times. Things like that. Now it seems to me, that this generally happens on sourcefiles that already sound good. How do you do it? Why does it happen? Why does having a great sounding recorded source make for sensitive EQ and is there anything particular about the way it's recorded that makes for this situation?..AUUHH!! MASKING EFFECT:wave: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members UstadKhanAli Posted March 7, 2007 Members Share Posted March 7, 2007 You can't cut or boost what isn't there.Maybe what you perceive as "better" sounds are sounds that have a fuller frequency range. Exactly. And don't have bizarre peaks or dips that require fixing. It simply gives you more to work with in the first place. If you're fighting the sound, and there's not so much sound there in the first place, it's rather difficult to get a great sound with EQ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.