Members amplayer Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 Supposedly it is smaller and faster, but I'll wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members spokenward Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 http://www.apple.com/macosx/specs.html Mac computer with an Intel processor This will make answering that question easier for a lot of people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators Lee Knight Posted August 28, 2009 Moderators Share Posted August 28, 2009 I am never excited about an OS update until a year after its been out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members UstadKhanAli Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 Ditto. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jeff da Weasel Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 I'm not an early adopter either, but after going through and polling a ton of people who use similar apps as me (which go way beyond just music and into graphics, web design, interactive design Second Life, and lots more) and ensuring complete compatibility and lack of bad-assed bugs, I'll probably pony up for Snow Leopard in the next couple of months. Theoretically, it looks great. But I'm not "theoretically" changing an OS, know what I'm saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members tremolounge Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 The "smaller and faster" part, if it's really true, is what has me excited -- seems like MS is doing the same with Windows 7, due to "popular demand". BTW, there's a good thread (with links) re: Snow Leopard as it impacts musicians at the former Big Blue Lounge: http://macosxaudio.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=46940 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ed A. Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 I just installed Snow Leopard, and amazingly, everything is working including my audio, video and graphics apps. Parallels 4.0 also works without a problem. There is hardly any noticeable difference in the UI and it doesn't seem any different than 10.5.8 except for some new Dock graphics. It's OK for the price of $29, but I don't think it would have been worth $100+. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members scud133 Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 I just installed Snow Leopard, and amazingly, everything is working including my audio, video and graphics apps. Parallels 4.0 also works without a problem. There is hardly any noticeable difference in the UI and it doesn't seem any different than 10.5.8 except for some new Dock graphics. It's OK for the price of $29, but I don't think it would have been worth $100+. All of the major changes are under the hood. Take a look at that specs page to see what you're getting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ggm1960 Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 For $30 it doesn't seem like a bad price but this is not 10.6 is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jeff da Weasel Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 For $30 it doesn't seem like a bad price but this is not 10.6 is it? It sure is. 10.6, Snow Leopard. And $29 is the upgrade price only if you're already running Leopard. I think it's $129 to upgrade from an earlier OS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members veracohr Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 I have a 10.5 disk that I never bothered to install. Still running 10.4. I don't need or want to use most of the peripheral applications stuffed into OSX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Geoff Grace Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 Too bad there's no poll choice between manic excitement and apathy. That's where my 10.6 feelings reside. Best, Geoff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members seclusion Posted August 28, 2009 Members Share Posted August 28, 2009 Did a super duper clone of 10.5.8 and updated the copy.All my apps work, Logic 9 works just as it did before, I don't see any difference in performance. Just Logic AU manager scanned all the plugs again and they all passed.FYI Logic 9 is still a 32 bit app, so you will still see the "out of memory" box when you push her.Come on Logic 9.01 (64 bit). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mr. Botch Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 I'm still on 10.4. I really love the idea that a software designer stops, takes a breath, and simply tweaks and streamlines what they already have. A few years back I took a "Software Reliability" course at the U of Washington, taught by a couple of incredibly intelligent software/safety/military folks. It was interesting to me at the outset that a lot of the class members were from the medical field (my background is explosives). One of the key concepts of the course was that software doesn't exactly have a "reliability", but more importantly it becomes "brittle" (love that term) the more it is modified and advanced (their extreme example was the flight software for the Navy's F-14 aircraft; 14 million + lines of code!). Sounds like Apple, with Snow Leopard, may have taken their current system requirements, and streamlined how it takes place, putting a lot more robustness into the code. But that's only conjecture on my part... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ggm1960 Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 It sure is. 10.6, Snow Leopard. And $29 is the upgrade price only if you're already running Leopard. I think it's $129 to upgrade from an earlier OS. Well I went ahead and ordered it but I don't know if I'll be brave enough to install it when it gets here. For me Digital Performer 6 is the all important app because I use it live. MOTU has a spew about Snow Leopard on their website but it's not clear if DP is good to go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ggm1960 Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 I have a 10.5 disk that I never bothered to install. Still running 10.4. I don't need or want to use most of the peripheral applications stuffed into OSX. The difference between 10.4 and 10.5 is like night and day for those of us accustomed to right mouse button functionality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members veracohr Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 The difference between 10.4 and 10.5 is like night and day for those of us accustomed to right mouse button functionality. How so? I find plenty of right mouse button use in 10.4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members amplayer Posted August 29, 2009 Author Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 How so? I find plenty of right mouse button use in 10.4 I also haven't noticed any difference at all in the right mouse button between 10.4 and 10.5. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members scud133 Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 I'm still on 10.4. I really love the idea that a software designer stops, takes a breath, and simply tweaks and streamlines what they already have. A few years back I took a "Software Reliability" course at the U of Washington, taught by a couple of incredibly intelligent software/safety/military folks. It was interesting to me at the outset that a lot of the class members were from the medical field (my background is explosives). One of the key concepts of the course was that software doesn't exactly have a "reliability", but more importantly it becomes "brittle" (love that term) the more it is modified and advanced (their extreme example was the flight software for the Navy's F-14 aircraft; 14 million + lines of code!). Sounds like Apple, with Snow Leopard, may have taken their current system requirements, and streamlined how it takes place, putting a lot more robustness into the code. But that's only conjecture on my part... Supposedly people are finding they have ~5gb more free space *after* the install. Apparently it streamlines a lot of bloated stuff on the OS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members nerol1st Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 I'm stoked, but not enough to jump on it as soon as possible. I will wait till around December, then have a jump on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 It sure is. 10.6, Snow Leopard. And $29 is the upgrade price only if you're already running Leopard. I think it's $129 to upgrade from an earlier OS. It's ten bucks if you purchased your Mac on or after June 8th. Unfortunately, I purchased mine on May 7th. Figures, huh? Oh well - it's only thirty bucks. Once Pro Tools is compatible, I'll probably upgrade. Other than for the forums, this computer isn't really all that mission critical, and my main DAW is a PC. As far as being jazzed about it or not, if it makes things run faster and utilizes the C2D CPU better, and takes less hard drive space, that sounds good to me. I'm not sure what the 64 bit limitations will be on my Macbook4,1 - it's a 64 bit CPU, but has the X3100 graphics, so there might be limitations due to that. I'm not sure if the system will accept more than the 4GB of RAM I have in it - I suspect that's a motherboard / chipset issue more than just a OS issue, so I doubt it. But like I said, since the beta reports seem to be generally positive, and it is probably going to take a while - I'm guessing a month or two - to get PT LE support, I'll probably upgrade once Digi has that available - assuming the initial stability reports are good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMS Author MikeRivers Posted August 29, 2009 CMS Author Share Posted August 29, 2009 I guess somebody's excited. I think I've received about a dozen press releases in the past week from audio manufacturers announcing that their products were compatible with Snow Leopard. Frankly, I wouldn't use a computer that names its operating systems like that. And I don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted August 29, 2009 Share Posted August 29, 2009 Frankly, I wouldn't use a computer that names its operating systems like that. And I don't. While I agree that their OS naming system is less than intuitive, that hardly seems like enough reason to not use it at all. YMMV. (FWIW, I use both Macs and PCs). Eventually though, they're going to run out of big cats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CMS Author MikeRivers Posted August 29, 2009 CMS Author Share Posted August 29, 2009 Eventually though, they're going to run out of big cats. I suppose that's more creative than OS-X, that you're supposed to know to pronounce "Oh-Ess-Ten." Though I guess Snow Leopard is still a 10.something. Wasn't there a just plain leopard a while back? Or was that for some other computer? Or the name of a DAW, music program, or synth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members eventArgs Posted August 29, 2009 Members Share Posted August 29, 2009 I suppose that's more creative than OS-X, that you're supposed to know to pronounce "Oh-Ess-Ten." Is that really how you're meant to say it? Folks in my office are probably chuckling away behind my back if it is, cos I've been saying "oh-ess-ex" the whole time... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.