Jump to content

SoFdrums

Members
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

SoFdrums's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. I had my doubts at first and when I tried it just out of chance and a suggestion it turned out to be brilliant. Yeah the cab will go through the snake and into the head. Got to get some XLR adaptors but thats no problem
  2. Would this studio setup work? If not tell me or give me suggestions
  3. You connect a 1/4" cable from the amp's output to a snake that goes to the room (whether it's through the wall or whatever). On the other side of the snake, you connect the associated 1/4" output to the cabinet. In my home studio, I run a snake under the doors out from the control room (the second bedroom) to the drum room (that'd be the living room) and connect it as above. It's just that the whole snake is going under the doors instead of being neatly tucked into the walls, but it's the same idea. And of course, I suppose anyone could just get a super long cable and have them go under the door. I've done that too. Now, I should put in my two cents. I defer to the guitarist's comfort level, obviously, but whenever possible, I try and have the guitarist in the same room as the cabinet because I like to capture that energy and interaction that comes when the guitar's pickups and the cabinet interact, and the whole interaction of someone being in the same room as the sound that they're creating. But, like everyone else, I don't always do that. Cheers, thought it might have been that
  4. Hey guy's no recording could be done, someone stole my mic stands at a gig, got to get some more. Very angry atm. Also got another question. You know when you find especially in big studios that in the control room the head is there but the cab is in the live room mic'ed up. Just wondering how that works, how do they connect the head to the cab? Cheers
  5. SM57 - The standard, but no longer the best. Advantages - if you see a loose screw or nail and don't have a hammer, you can beat it back into place with a 57 and the 57 will work. Disadvantages - you really have to move it around a lot to get the sound you want - which is hard if you're doing it by yourself. E609 - The NEW 57 for miking guitar amps. Just....better, and less finicky about placement, hangs down for side address. Try it! Disadvantages - none, except if you have a metal grille on your amp and you hang it, you'll be wondering what all those annoying "tick" sounds are as the mike bounces off the grille repeatedly. I agree with a lot of what you posted Terry. The Hotplate is more of an attenuator, not a speaker sim. The Red Box isn't the be all, end all of emulators, but certainly beats nothing at all. Haven't tried a Mother Load yet, so no comments on that. The Palmer is actually pretty good - I don't own one, but a client does, and I've used it (although blended with microphones on cabs; IOW, not exclusively) several times. Yes, THD Yellowjackets are (usually) going to knock your wattage down a bit (although not really in a 6V6 amp), but are more about a tonal change IMO - EL84's sound quite a bit different from 6L6's / 6V6's / and even EL34's. But I do disagree regarding the E609 vs the SM57. I find the 609 is far more placement sensitive than the SM57. It has a tighter polar pattern, and IMO doesn't sound very good off-axis. Yes, you can hang the cable over the amp and have it sit flat against the grille, and I wouldn't mind that live, but in the studio, I'd rather avoid the direct coupling if I can - I usually don't like to have my microphones and cables in contact with my sound sources. I use mine on a stand... and I might have it only a few whisker's distance from the grille, but I never have it touching it, regardless of what it's made of. I'm just funny that way I guess. I think the E609 is a nice microphone, but to my ears, it's a bit fuller and darker, and has a more pronounced sounding proximity effect and less presence peak than a 57. If you want extra meat and thump, it works well, and while I do own one, and have been happy with it in some cases and for some sounds, I usually prefer a 421 if I'm going for that sort of a tone. A 57 also isn't a bad mic, but it's not my go-to on guitar cabs either. A lot of the time, for dynamics, I use Audix D2's and i5's. They have some of the meat of the 609, and some of the presence of the 57 IMO. Lately for me though, it's been more about ribbon microphones - a Groove Tubes Velo-8 on one amp / cab, and a Beyer M160 on another cab in a second room, with maybe a LD condenser further back in the room on the same cab as the Velo-8. Both of those ribbons are VERY cool sounding on guitar cabs, and both are less expensive than the (also very nice ) Royers and Coles ribbon microphones. AEA also makes some killer ribbons. I'm not too up to date on some of the Asian built ribbon mikes... But hey - I think it ought to be possible to get at least pretty decent / good tracks with any of the microphones we talked about in this thread. I think the key is getting the guitar to sound great coming out of the amp, and then experimenting so you know the way the mic sounds and how it reacts in different positions relative to the speaker(s), and then placing (or moving) the thing until what you hear coming out of the CR speakers is as close as possible to the way it sounded out in the room. And I agree - it can be hard to get tones without an assistant to help with positioning the mic while you listen in the control room - although a pair of the Extreme Isolation headphones can help a lot with that. There are a ton of viable ways to mic up guitar cabinets, and I've been thinking about them a lot lately - even more than usual (and not a week goes by where I don't stick a mic in front of a guitar cab - or several guitar cabs ) because I have been getting ready to draw up an outline for a instructional video on the subject that I was asked if I might be interested in doing... I think that might be a fun / interesting project. I'd watch it!! Cheers for the replies guys, really helped. Going to record hopefully next week so I should get a few previews of what I've taken on board and tell me what you think!
  6. Haha, woo let me just wipe that sweat from my brow. Cheers for the advice.. It seems though that when I use a mic/mics I cant achieve it as powerful as compared to the direct line. I seem to pick up to much background or it just hasnt got the 'balls' Now a speaker emulator does sound intriguing, where exactly can I get one and how much do they range for? Also would it make a difference if I was to record a cab or the speakers in a combo for instance? Cheers.
  7. Hey so I've recently recorded my band and I'm happy with the mixes but i'd like to progress in my recording techniques. I recorded my guitarists on a 100 watt combo marshall amp which had an emulated direct line out which I used as opposed to micing. I believed this produced the sound we were looking for. BUT Recently both my guitarists have purchased half stacks and are wishing to use their new amps for recording, so of course I said definitely. When they brought down just the head I expected to achieve the same results. The thing was they didnt have emulated line outs on them so I opted for the speaker outputs on both heads but achieved a thin guitar sound (Not Nice) so we tried the headphone outputs and achieved the same. The thing was it would sound ok on clean but it was when they try distortion you would lose all the body in the sound. Can anybody suggest what I should do to get that meaty distorted sound whilst still getting those clean pronounced guitar sounds? Cheers Also I am using a Firepod with Cubase SX3
×
×
  • Create New...