Jump to content

Why do shredders like superstrats?


Spike Li

Recommended Posts

  • Members

What exactly is it about strats/superstrats that makes them so appealing to shredders? :confused:

 

One would assume that a 24.75" inch scale would be more suited to shredding cause the frets are closer together and the strings are looser, but apparently is isnt...

 

Im definitely no shredder so could someone shed some light on this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 62
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Members

The 25.5 inch scale allows for faster playing. Because after you hit the string it goes back into place faster for more speed. And then there's the Floyd Rose. You can pull up or dive bomb with it. And let's don't forget the bridge humbucker. Most of us like 'em a little hotter than a regular PAF. For more crunch and sustain. A lot of people don't know it but strats and teles were designed for country and western music. But shredders were made for rock.

 

jackson-sl1bp.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

One would assume that a 24.75" inch scale would be more suited to shredding cause the frets are closer together and the strings are looser, but apparently is isnt...

 

Because the guitars they used originally in the late 70's and early 80's were strat based guitars.

 

Things like Charvels and Kramers were built because people were already taking strats and modifying them.

 

The reason being was things like the fact it has a pickguard so it was easy to change electronics, they already had some tremolo routing, removable necks to get the setups right so they string action is low etc.

I guess it just followed.

 

Plus in reality the difference in fret width is minimal, however for holding a tune the longer scale is better for the light strings which are better for bending.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Maybe guitarists of that era wanted their own style? Didn't feel like being locked in by tradition? Wanted their own sound?

 

Obviously there were physical things about the guitars that made playing more comfortable. I prefer strats teles les pauls and SG's but one need only pick up a jackson soloist once to know the ergonomics of it are way better than all of those aside from maybe the SG. And lets face it...80's guitarists beat the shit out of there guitars more than anyone before while still expecting it to finish the gig..so floyds were a necessary invention.

 

It's not like you can't shred on the others. Malmsteen plays just as fast as anyone on a strat and I've seen Batio play a Les Paul as fast as he plays anything else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

It's the combination of the longer scale neck, easy fret access, extra frets, the fact that it's easy to swap out pickups and electronics, they look cool, most have FR's, great playability. Superstrats are designed for heavy rock/metal and shred. You don't absolutely need a superstrat to play that kind of music though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...