Jump to content

Asymmetrical neck?


kayd_mon

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I didn't see a thread on this already (but then again, I'm not exactly sure how to search), but what does everyone think of the asymmetrical neck carve on the newer Les Pauls? I'd imagine that it would feel awkward. I can't stand V-necks, I don't know how I would react to an asymmetrical one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I didn't see a thread on this already (but then again, I'm not exactly sure how to search), but what does everyone think of the asymmetrical neck carve on the newer Les Pauls? I'd imagine that it would feel awkward. I can't stand V-necks, I don't know how I would react to an asymmetrical one.

 

 

I haven't played one yet, but it looks uncomfortable. I did some googling and found these

 

http://www.lespaulforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=148633

http://www.mylespaul.com/forums/gibson-les-pauls/111806-how-does-asymmetrical-neck-compare.html

 

I've read part of it, the reviews seem to be mostly positive or neutral. Although honestly I don't visit either of these websites regularly, so I have no idea if they're opinions should be trusted of if they're just dumbass Gibson fanboys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I Used to be a 60's necks guy. I hated the 50's fat necks, but I did like the solid feel and tone they seemed to add. I bought a EVH and loved the neck which is asymmetrical and loved it, but I figured that was due to how small the length feels. I then had an opportunity to buy a 2008 standard asymmetrical at a bargin basement price so I did. The neck felt fine at first, but after playing it for a while I really like it. You get all the tone and heftiness of the 50's style, but it is much easier to play. At this point it is my fafvorite neck shape. The shape gives you a good amount of wood to grap on to for chords but allows easy access for single note playing.

 

Interesting thing is, now I do not even mind playing 50's style necks. They just do not seem as big anymore. I have fairly small chunky hands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I Used to be a 60's necks guy. I hated the 50's fat necks, but I did like the solid feel and tone they seemed to add. I bought a EVH and loved the neck which is asymmetrical and loved it, but I figured that was due to how small the length feels. I then had an opportunity to buy a 2008 standard asymmetrical at a bargin basement price so I did. The neck felt fine at first, but after playing it for a while I really like it. You get all the tone and heftiness of the 50's style, but it is much easier to play. At this point it is my fafvorite neck shape. The shape gives you a good amount of wood to grap on to for chords but allows easy access for single note playing.


Interesting thing is, now I do not even mind playing 50's style necks. They just do not seem as big anymore. I have fairly small chunky hands.

 

 

I was trying to think of a good discription for an asymetrical contour and this is it!! I also have similar hands. Maybe there's something to that as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I prefer thinner necks, but don't have a big issue when I play a guitar with a thicker neck. With that said, I have a Les Paul Classic with the 60's neck and I also have a 2008 LP with the asymmetrical. If you prefer thicker necks, then the asymmetrical will probably take less time getting used to it. But it is comfortable to play and isn't really noticeable to me like what some might think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

oh i thought this was going to be about those perfect intonation frets.

 

This is a cool idea since no one's hand is symmetrical, however no two people's hands are the same so either it will feel better or it won't.

 

pretty simple outcome IMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...