Jump to content

I've Just Discovered Light Top/Heavy Bottom Strings...


monto

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

wow.. i wish i discovered them earlier :love:

 

we've all heard that thicker strings mean thicker, fatter tone, more sustain, better tuning stability/intonation (don't quote me on all of this lol...)

 

i gave them a try today and love them. i was worried about how thicker strings are harder to bend, but then i realised, i never actually bend the bottom 3 thicker strings! i only seem to ever bend the top 3 thinner strings.

 

so anyway, i advise anyone out there wanting to give it a try to do so, i didn't have to adjust my truss rod/action with the change by the way (using my SG copy guitar). they just seemed to settle right in happily.

 

ok so below are the strings i used to use, followed by the new ones!

 

......and dont forget folks, once you go fat, you cant go back .. :rolleyes:

 

BEFORE:

x02_145784.jpg

AFTER:

x02_145788.jpg

  • Members
Posted

I have a set of these that I want to put on my Tele, but I just had it setup and don't want to have to redo that again. I may try them anyway here before too long.

  • Members
Posted

When I get my Strat set up I'll try out the 10-52. Seems like a cool idea, I don't mind playing the thicker strings on an acoustic so perhaps that will transfer.

 

Would 10-52 on a Strat scale really put up a fight? As much as a regular set of 10's I would think, in terms of bending on the 3 high strings (in pitch).

  • Members
Posted

....Been using them since Angus Young was in long trousers....

 

i swear my sg sounds more 'angus'ey now with that 52 bottom E string .. hihi.gif

  • Members
Posted

I like 10-52 on a 24.75" guitar and 9-46 on a 25.5" guitar. Lighter bottom strings always sound too twangy and have pitch bend to my ears. The big bottom sounds nice and full.

  • Members
Posted

 

Hmmm. I played them for a while but my tech told me that over time they can cause a slight twist in the neck. Just food for thought.

 

 

He told you wrong!

 

I've used them for well over 30 years on several guitars and no twist at all.

  • Members
Posted

Cool...I just bought a couple sets of Ernie Ball "Slinky Top/Heavy Bottom" strings in 10-52. I currently use 11-48 on my Jay Turser Les Paul Studio copy but I want to be able to bend the 1st e string easier. I am thinking 10-52 will be a good match for it.

  • Members
Posted

yup 10-52 for me. I use boomers. My Tele LOVES them! (sounds stupid but each guitar does better with certain strings)

 

10-52 is, for all intents and purpose a 12 set low; and a 10 set high the best of both worlds : easy string bending(no wrapped G), and beefy chord work.

  • Members
Posted

Used them for years, but eventually moved away from them because I found the heavy bottom was way too boomy and overpowered the light top. Too unbalanced or something.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...