Members WKG Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 I have a CVC Tele that stands easily with my 01 American Strat and my Parker Fly Mojo. They are excellent guitars and not just great for the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hardtdc Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 I own a VM Tele and love it. It's been upgraded with boutique PUs and is a killer guitar now. I've been wanting to try out some of the CVs for a while and finally got a chance to play a couple this afternoon (Custom Tele and Classic 50's Tele). I was pretty impressed. The CVs are outstanding guitars for the money as well. The double bound custom I picked up was flawless. The only thing I didn't like about it was that it didn't have brass saddles like the 50's did. I will say that I am not as much a fan of the high gloss neck on either, but that could be worn down though. I much prefer the feel of the neck on my Vintage Modified even though its only a 24-3/4 scale length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members twotimingpete Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 very nice, compared to other guitars you can buy I'd say CV's are about the highest value you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Spacetrucker Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Yes, worth every penny and more Adore my 50's CV Strat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members wagdog Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 I had a 50's cv strat, and I really liked it, and it was a very nice guitar. Sold it though, just didn't play it in favor of my other strats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Fred Buzz Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Read this and ask again: http://acapella.harmony-central.com/showthread.php?2736342-NGD-Squier-CV-50-s-tele-with...-FLAME-MAPLE-NECK-!-!-! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members clay sails Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Yes, they are very good. That's what everyone says they are. Very good. Your definition of "overrated" must be "rated correctly"The reason people sing their praises is because they're affordable and excellent relative to the amount of money you're paying. On their own, they are quality instruments. Relative to the price, they are outstanding. Actually, they're more expensive than a decent, used Fender MIM which are equally good or better but don't get the over-praise. CV just aren't that special. There are dozens of inexpensive, good instruments out there. My objection to the CV tele was that the pickups were very vanilla -- far worse than a MIM ash tele I used to own. The neck felt decent, but was coated in plastic of some sort. Not sure if there was even wood in there. My CV strat has some sort of finish-flaw so that the sunburst faded very quickly and now looks pretty bad. So what I'm saying is: they aren't terrible, but they aren't as amazing as the overhype on this forum suggests. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members photon9 Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Actually, they're more expensive than a decent, used Fender MIM which are equally good or better but don't get the over-praise. CV just aren't that special. There are dozens of inexpensive, good instruments out there.My objection to the CV tele was that the pickups were very vanilla -- far worse than a MIM ash tele I used to own. The neck felt decent, but was coated in plastic of some sort. Not sure if there was even wood in there. My CV strat has some sort of finish-flaw so that the sunburst faded very quickly and now looks pretty bad. So what I'm saying is: they aren't terrible, but they aren't as amazing as the overhype on this forum suggests. I much prefer the neck on the CVs to MIM standards. The pups on both are not really that great but not horrible either. I'm sure eventually many would end up upgrading either of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members WKG Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Actually, they're more expensive than a decent, used Fender MIM which are equally good or better but don't get the over-praise. CV just aren't that special. There are dozens of inexpensive, good instruments out there. My objection to the CV tele was that the pickups were very vanilla -- far worse than a MIM ash tele I used to own. The neck felt decent, but was coated in plastic of some sort. Not sure if there was even wood in there. My CV strat has some sort of finish-flaw so that the sunburst faded very quickly and now looks pretty bad. So what I'm saying is: they aren't terrible, but they aren't as amazing as the overhype on this forum suggests. Different strokes I suppose... Every MIM I played next to the CV Teles felt like cheap junk in comparison. The pickups in these are excellent. I did change mine to a set of Nocasters but it was out of personal preference not necessity. There may be some hype in this forum but you find basically the same opinion on these all over, including TDPRI. Oh, and I paid $300 for my CVC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members alfsboy Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 I like my Fiesta red CV Strat,the Biffy Clyro model with its mixed magnet pickups a lot .I have had a Squier JV ,a Highway one, and I prefer the CV .The JV had a 7.5 radius which is probably why it didnt appeal so much but it sounded great .Not sure why butthe CV hits the spot more than the others .Its very well finished and a very slick neck and rosewood board .Its slim but it doesnt seem to bother me .my other guitar is a Baja so I know a thick neck when I play one but I can switch about without thinking "oh this neck is too thin'.If the shiny neck is a problem than just get some fine wire wool and take the shine off a bit .Easy.I do note in the UK the price has rocketed up .In the summer my CV strat was 259 UKP with a free Kinsman hard foam case (40 quid) ,making the CV a bargain but now just the CV is Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jamdogg Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 i knock down the gloss on the back of the neck with a few swipes of 220 with every string change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members BlackCat Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Keep it up. Even though I've sworn off cheap guitars you guys are eventually going to sell me on one of these. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JasonA Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 If you're going to compare to a used MIM, you might as well get a used CV. My used CV 50's strat cost me $215. And personally I find the pickups FAR superior to the MIM strats. The bodies are typically lighter too. Mine is a 2-piece for all I can tell. I don't think they've been overhyped at all. They're not the best out there of course, but I find them far superior to similar price range strats. Haven't gotten to try the teles yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Misha Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 All the CV Strats that I tried were very nice! I particularly remember one - an Olympic White '50s Strat - that was exceptional. I'll always remember it. (I wish I would have bought it...) The '50s CV Tele I tried was not very well balanced, though. The body was too heavy for the neck but I can't say if it was just that one. The thinline was nice, I haven't tried the Custom CV Tele yet. I just got a new guitar that I love, two days ago: a Godin Session. I tried several and like them a lot a few months ago. I tried another one thursday that didn't speak to me. Them I tried the one that became "mine". I instantly fell in love with it! It sounds really good. I love the 12'' radius neck. It was perfectly set up from the factory, nice low action! The pickups are very low and that might contribute to what I love about its tone: it sounds "woody". I highly recommend that you try these guitars too. Here is a link: http://www.godinguitars.com/godinsessionp.htmI like it as much - if not better - than my Classic Player '60s Strat!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members walrus1 Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 My CVC tele quickly became my main guitar. The pickups are actually really good - much better than stock MIM, imho, and definitely playable out of the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Zappa74 Posted January 29, 2011 Members Share Posted January 29, 2011 Weird to hear someone ask if a Squier is worth the cash. They're cheap and the Classic Vibes are fantastic guitars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Monkeybot Posted January 30, 2011 Members Share Posted January 30, 2011 Classic Vibes and Vintage Modified are the guitars that made Squiers desirable and not just the guitar you were stuck with if you were on a budget. I have a CV 50's Tele and I could scarcely ask for a better guitar for the price. They are building a reputation among players, critics and generally everybody with 300 bucks burning a hole in their pocket. I vote "Hell yes and then some" Nice way of putting it. I've had an American Standard Tele for maybe 13-14 years now and it's always been my go-to. For lack of anything other than wanting a new guitar, I picked up the CV '50s last week and am blown away. The only thing that I'm going to change is the nut (gonna put .11s on it and I want a bone nut) - the pups are not as hot as the AmSt, but other than that, it's a fantastic guitar. Not a fantastic cheap guitar - A fantastic guitar. It won't replace my AmSt Tele, but it's gonna be played a lot. Hard to get my head around how cool it is - Sweet thing... Yeah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Angry Tele Posted January 30, 2011 Members Share Posted January 30, 2011 the necks are real wood and arent coated in plastic, but have a thin poly coat. I have a US52RI, a CIJ52, and a Squier CVC and none are better or worse than the others. Prices are $1500, $800, $340. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RVIVR Posted January 30, 2011 Members Share Posted January 30, 2011 Amazing guitars. Don't let the Squier headstock scare you off. I owned both of the solid-body Telecaster models they've put out, and I use them as back-up while I'm on tour in case my '52 Hot Rod breaks a string or something. Amazing quality, in fact, the later model (the 60's with the binding) may even be of better quality than the original 50's(?) model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ken361 Posted February 18, 2011 Members Share Posted February 18, 2011 I put a little 59 in my CV Tele it really sounds good now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GilmourD Posted February 18, 2011 Members Share Posted February 18, 2011 YES! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.