Jump to content

Epiphone 2010-2011


scolfax

Recommended Posts

  • Members

Epiphone has had it's ups and downs quality-wise. In the past few years they have opened up a dedicated factory in China.

 

I've seen quite a few Epiphone NGD's here lately, which made me curious. I'll start with the assumption that they know how to make a guitar look good. But what's the consensus on the quality of MIC Epiphones made in the past year? Looks good but still cheap? Best they've ever done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:lol:

This thread will range from 'all epis are {censored}e, and will never be anywhere as good as a real gibson' to 'every epi is the best guitar ever, especially for the price'.

 

You forgot the guys that will tell you to toss every Epi in favor of Agile :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Probably depends who you ask.

I have a 90s MIK, early 2000s MIIndonesia and two recent MIC models.

Don't see much difference between the MIK and the MIC models at all. My newest one has upgraded parts that none of the others have. Full size pots, Grover tuners, good pickups and nickel plated hardware.

When looking for my new one, I tried out four just alike. The first three were good but I liked the finish way better on the last one. Not for QC issues; it was just a different shade.

My new one was set up very well, good fretwork, etc. I think Epis are as good as they've been since leaving Kalamazoo.

 

EG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Probably depends who you ask.

I have a 90s MIK, early 2000s MIIndonesia and two recent MIC models.

Don't see much difference between the MIK and the MIC models at all. My newest one has upgraded parts that none of the others have. Full size pots, Grover tuners, good pickups and nickel plated hardware.

When looking for my new one, I tried out four just alike. The first three were good but I liked the finish way better on the last one. Not for QC issues; it was just a different shade.

My new one was set up very well, good fretwork, etc. I think Epis are as good as they've been since leaving Kalamazoo.


EG

 

 

I also don't see much difference between MIK and MIC... I suspect it's just a different form of snobbery in most cases. I have two MIK Epiphones and one MIC. All are built well - they look, feel, and sound great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I bought this Epiphone Dot Studio last week from GC.

 

DSCF0422.jpg

 

The quality is easily as good as my Ibanez Artcore. It might even be better. The stock electronics are definitely better than those in the Artcore. The quality is on par with my Gibson Melody Maker IMHO. But not as good as my Gibson 50's Tribute. This guitar really changed how I look at Epiphone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I think that most of the budget-priced guitars (e.g. Epi, Squier, etc.) are the best they've ever been. It's getting to the point that it's hard to find a real dog out there. Today's new, budget-conscious guitarists are so much better off than those of us starting back 30 or 40 years ago!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I think that most of the budget-priced guitars (e.g. Epi, Squier, etc.) are the best they've ever been. It's getting to the point that it's hard to find a real dog out there. Today's new, budget-conscious guitarists are so much better off than those of us starting back 30 or 40 years ago!

 

 

For sure. The Golden Age!

 

I haven't played any of the new MIC Epi's. Both of the ones I own, and the couple I previously owned, are/were all MIK.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I recently bought a new Epiphone Masterbilt AJ-500RE acoustic/electric and I can sometimes hardly put it down.It features a solid sitka spruce top,solid rosewood back/sides,quality Shadow electronics,bone bridge/nut and very nice body/neck/headstock binding.The fit and finish are top notch,has great neck/fretwork and the tone is rich and complex.Oh,and it can get very loud,and with little compression.It sounds more full and richer than my also excellent Martin DM1 that I recently sold.Though it's probably not quite on par with a $3000 Gibson,Martin or Taylor,it's definately close enough for me.Btw,I paid a bit over $600 for mine,including the hardshall case.

 

 

Ed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I bought two Gibsons in the last year as "upgrades"

I have a Korean AJ-35S acoustic from the 90's with a solid top and a new Epi Les Paul ProFX that was being blown out at GC.

 

THe Chinese Epi LP easily works along side the Gibson. There is a subtle elegance about the Gibson for sure, but seriously, the Epi (with modded pickups) is a dream to play and it sounds fantastic - and you could buy FOUR of them for what the Gibson cost. If you really want a Gibson...get one. But seriously, side by side the Epi feels, looks,plays, and sounds like a guitar of about equal QUALITY. :idk:

 

The acoustic is a different matter- the Gibson acoustic resonates like it's alive in my hands in a way that the Epi doesn't. But the Epi does sound good, it just doesn't bloom and breathe like the Gibson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

All I know is when I go into Guitar Center and play practically any Epiphone of the shelf, it's really bad. Poorly set up, strings either way too high or low, lots of them seem like clunkers. That just might speak to how they ship out of the box. It's a shame that they can't spend 15 minutes setting up each guitar so people might actually want to buy them. I have no idea if it's a QC problem or not, because I don't know if other brands have issues, but all the Squiers seem to play fine (maybe not awesome, but passable).

 

I'd absolutely love to try one of the Epi Tribute LP's though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...