Jump to content

DAOTD "We have the ability to take him out..."


The Insomniac

Recommended Posts

  • Members

And Pat Robertson slips into the lead among people who embarass the hell out of my part of the world.

 

 

What a jackass.

 

 

There are far worse people in the world than Chavez, but he's got oil.

 

 

I thyink Pat qualifies as Stupid Mother{censored}er of the day because dumbass just isn't strong enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by burdizzos

And Pat Robertson slips into the lead among people who embarass the hell out of my part of the world.



What a jackass.



There are far worse people in the world than Chavez, but he's got oil.



I thyink Pat qualifies as Stupid Mother{censored}er of the day because dumbass just isn't strong enough.

 

 

aye DITTO :-P and we shouldnt take "Anyone" out just becuse they can rais or lower the price of gas in an america *if americans can get smart they just buy eletric cars and walla no more gas worries"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by DerekDRP



if americans can get smart they just buy eletric cars and walla no more gas worries

 

 

Yeah, because electricity is free and doesn't come from fossil fuels. Everyone driving electric cars would just raise the price of electricity.

 

Energy isn't free and since 60% of the electricity produced in the US comes from coal, I think we're better off burning petroleum based fuels for transportation from an environmental standpoint.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by DerekDRP



aye DITTO :-P and we shouldnt take "Anyone" out just becuse they can rais or lower the price of gas in an america *if americans can get smart they just buy eletric cars and walla no more gas worries"

 

 

Yes! We can power them with electric eels!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • CMS Author

 

Originally posted by DerekDRP



aye DITTO :-P and we shouldnt take "Anyone" out just becuse they can rais or lower the price of gas in an america *if americans can get smart they just buy eletric cars and walla no more gas worries"

 

 

And what generates the electricity for said eletric cars? The hot air generated by indignation in HCBF can only take us so far.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • CMS Author

 

Originally posted by burdizzos



Yeah, because electricity is free and doesn't come from fossil fuels. Everyone driving electric cars would just raise the price of electricity.


Energy isn't free and since 60% of the electricity produced in the US comes from coal, I think we're better off burning petroleum based fuels for transportation from an environmental standpoint.

 

 

Well, at least there's three of us that understand that 'lectricty ain't free;)

 

 

And there's one more reason for nuclear power. If we didn't fear it like Black Death, we could see that the rest of the world somehow manages to build and maintain nuke plants that are safe and efficient. I think learning to deal with a few tones per year or less of spent fuel is a LOT easier than dealing with all the pollution problems caused by fossil fuel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by Craigv



Well, at least there's three of us that understand that 'lectricty ain't free;)



And there's one more reason for nuclear power. If we didn't fear it like Black Death, we could see that the rest of the world somehow manages to build and maintain nuke plants that are safe and efficient. I think learning to deal with a few tones per year or less of spent fuel is a LOT easier than dealing with all the pollution problems caused by fossil fuel.

 

 

 

Reason isn't allowed here, I think that's in the FAQs somewhere.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

How very "Christian" of him. I like the Pat / Osama steel cage smackdown idea, I'd actually watch that. Make it Deathmatch and I'd even pay. (Ok, so that's being a bit hypocritical, I suppose, but I don't make a public spectacle of myself and how "religious" I am like both of them do.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by bholder

How very "Christian" of him. I like the Pat / Osama steel cage smackdown idea, I'd actually watch that. Make it Deathmatch and I'd even pay. (Ok, so that's being a bit hypocritical, I suppose, but I don't make a public spectacle of myself and how "religious" I am like both of them do.)

 

 

Why not make it a tag team match? Robertson and Jerry Falwell vs. bin Laden and al-Zarqawi!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Originally posted by burdizzos



Yeah, because electricity is free and doesn't come from fossil fuels. Everyone driving electric cars would just raise the price of electricity.


Energy isn't free and since 60% of the electricity produced in the US comes from coal, I think we're better off burning petroleum based fuels for transportation from an environmental standpoint.

 

 

no, but instead of having 600 million points of pollution, you have 192. its alot easier to control and clean up 192 points than a millions. you have a toilet right? same idea, {censored} all in one place so its easy to clean, rahter than trying to figuer out who keeps {censored}ting behind the couch.

 

 

zachoff

Holy {censored}, a Communist Muslim?! Christ be damned if he's not #1 on my (s)hit list.

 

whos a communist muslim? chaves is a socialist, not a communist. there is a difference. and where the hell did you get muslim from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

just to further the argument regarding nukes, I read

a paper by someone asserting that Nuclear energy is also

not that great of an answer - it takes quite a bit of energy and infrastructure to make it happen, so much so in fact that it almost

offsets the seeming ly huge return you get with nuclear fuel.

I'll try and scare up the article if anyone is interested but the

gist was something to the effect: lots of energy + billions of energy = tens of pounds of actual fuel + lots of energy =

nuclear power facilities = dealing with waste.

I think that nuclear might be less polluting (without a lot of research or thought about it) than coal / gas, but it is still significant when you factor in the whole equations.

 

my two cents

C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Originally posted by cthulhu0


whos a communist muslim? chaves is a socialist, not a communist. there is a difference. and where the hell did you get muslim from?

 

You are, dude! Better watch out or Pat will come after you...

 

F'n Fascist communist Muslim hippie! :D:p

 

I was totally kidding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...