Members F0REST Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 what do you think of the skryker bass?http://www.warwickbass.com/basses/cruiser.html
Members bholder Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 Looks ok to me, if you like pointy basses. It's one of the few Warwick body styles I can tolerate. No clue what it would sound like, should be pretty decent.
Members L-1329 Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 Make it a fiver with a less fugly headstock and I'd rock the hell out of that!
Members tenyearsgone Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 I like Warwick basses but that's just fugly. Reminds me of the old Scorpions bands' guitars..
Members kilmister Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 I dig it:cool: but I can't afford it:mad:
Members james on bass Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 Originally posted by L-1329 Make it a fiver with a less fugly headstock and I'd rock the hell out of that! Make it a fiver and keep the headstock and I'd rock it!
Members Darkstorm Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 Hum, double P pups like BC Richs except bridge set is opposite(low E closer to bridge, G string side further from bridge). Bassically a BC Rich type sound with the tweaking of diff brand P pups and hoice of topwoods. BC Rich's most often use mahagony body with maple top option for see thru colors. Dunno what tonal charthe zi whatever wood top option has. Potentially an exccellent sounding bass. But not with the growl etc that requires bubinga body. Variation of explorer body shape. Not bad.
Members L-1329 Posted August 25, 2005 Members Posted August 25, 2005 Originally posted by scythe I don't like pointy basses. Blasphemy! You will now be forced to listen to Lug mp3's until you regain your senses...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.