Members Markee Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Is it worth the cost and trouble?
Members bassman1956 Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Not to be flippant, but, only if you like that J pickup.
Members i_wanna_les_paul Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 It's probably best to get something like an SX P/J to see if you like it or not, depending on what instrument you're wanting to carve up. Me, personally, I love a P/J bass. You can thump or growl or a nice smooth tone when mixed. I quite like them, myself. Dustin
Members bassman1956 Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Right! First, what do you have? What would you modify? It's a pickup routing, plus additional electronics. And there's no going back. I have an Iby active PJ 4, and an Aria passive PJ 5. Personnaly, I LOVE the PJ format. IF you like the bridge tone of a jazz bassANDyou can see using that blended with your P, somewheres between 0 and 100%THENit's worth considering. If you don't like the sound of a bridge J pup, end of discussion.
Members Apendecto Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 I did and liked it. I had a P with a SD Quarter Pounder. Sounded good but I bought a router bit and a J template from Stewart Mac. I was a little weary, digging a hole into my bass. But it turned out professional. I put a Jazz hot stack in the J and moved the input jack to the side of the bass, so I could use the existing hole as the third pot. I'd say go for it. Yo.
Members bnyswonger Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Originally posted by Apendecto I did and liked it.I had a P with a SD Quarter Pounder. Sounded good but I bought a router bit and a J template from Stewart Mac. I was a little weary, digging a hole into my bass. But it turned out professional. I put a Jazz hot stack in the J and moved the input jack to the side of the bass, so I could use the existing hole as the third pot. I'd say go for it.Yo. I've done the same thing, but went to strat-style angled jack on the front. You might consider using a straight '53 P reissue instead of a jazz in the bridge position - it's got a little more fatness and aggressive sound but still gives you the extra bite & presence. My favorite bass I ever had was modded this way.
Members mrcrow Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Originally posted by bnyswonger I've done the same thing, but went to strat-style angled jack on the front. You might consider using a straight '53 P reissue instead of a jazz in the bridge position - it's got a little more fatness and aggressive sound but still gives you the extra bite & presence. My favorite bass I ever had was modded this way. ever think of a strat style jack on the back..
Members bnyswonger Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Originally posted by mrcrow ever think of a strat style jack on the back.. Naw - I need the back of my bass smooth like a baby's bum. I'd be knocking the thing constantly...
Members Ole Man Blues Posted August 26, 2005 Members Posted August 26, 2005 Just buy a Jazz Bass............. OMB
Members Markee Posted August 28, 2005 Author Members Posted August 28, 2005 Thanks for the replies. The bass in question is an Ibanez Roadstar P-bass. They came in both P and PJ forms in 1984. I honestly don't know why I need to add a J to it other than tonal blending. I have a Geddy Jazz and really don't care for the bridge PU's tone on it's own. Pardon my gas......I'll light a match.
Members bassman1956 Posted August 28, 2005 Members Posted August 28, 2005 Originally posted by Markee Pardon my gas......I'll light a match. Sig-worthy!
Members Apendecto Posted August 28, 2005 Members Posted August 28, 2005 I'm not a huge fan of the bridge alone either but the blend is cool with the P. Yo.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.