Jump to content

G&L 2500 vs. TRIBUTE G&L L2500


Recommended Posts

  • Members

Anybody played both so he can speak about differences. I had an opportunity to play a Tribute L2500 and I was really amazed by its sound, playability and construction (It was natural finish, ash body, maple fretboard).

 

Is the higher cost of the original G&L reasonable? I ask this cause I can't imagine how much better it could be...

 

Thanks!

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members

Originally posted by JC Bass

I think Thunderbroom has both...

 

He does...I own a non-Tribute 2500, and I wouldn't trade it for anything. Truly versatile, easy to play, sounds great, and mine has a killer finish. I've tried the Tributes in music stores, but not for long enough or with enough dedication to really give you an educated review. Sorry. But from what I've heard, they're pretty close to the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Members

same exact pups and preamp, same type of bridge (made elsewhere to the same specs), different neck (not bi-cut). The oly complaint I hear is scratchy pots on some, but that's cheap to swap. The Premium Tribute has a solid Ash body while the USA has an Ash top on top of American Tilia (basswood :D ) to reduce weight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...