Jump to content

More tele love...


Thunderbroom

Recommended Posts

  • Moderators
I think he's getting at that on the hollow body, the top half of the body (bass side) was carved out, while the bottom half (treble side) is still solid and heavier, which would make a lower CG. If this is the case it makes no difference to neck dive, all that matters is the total weight and where the upper strap button is. So when the total weight is less (hollow body) there is more dive.

That's exactly what I'm getting at, except what I'm thinking at the moment is the mass of the bridge has more of an effect on the semi-hollow body than it does on the solid. I have to admit though, I'm slowly but surely beginning to see mass and center of gravity from the L-1329/kindness angle.:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

That's exactly what I'm getting at, except what I'm thinking at the moment is the mass of the bridge has more of an effect on the semi-hollow body than it does on the solid. I have to admit though, I'm slowly but surely beginning to see mass and center of gravity from the L-1329/kindness angle.
:)

 

What you're observing will have an effect on how the bass hangs, but only from the perspective of how "flat" the bass is when you have it on a strap. Such as, does the top tend to pull or face away from you or does it stay vertical. Not really noticible unless you have a bass with a forward strap button on the back of the bass like a T-Bird, or Mockingbird, Explorer etc. As far as neck dive goes, what you're thinking has no effect at all. Weight and where it's centered is all that matters with neck dive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

First you calculate the center of mass for the object. Then you identify the upward torque of the force applied to the strap button in relation to the center of mass to counteract potential neck dive. Since the hollowbody's center of mass is located further towards the nut, it requires more force to counteract neckdive.

 

 

would a balanced cable significantly effect the neckdive of the bass?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

 

Correct. I understand removing weight forward of center moves the weight towards the headstock. I'm also considering that the weight was removed from above, not below. Taking both ASATs, one semi-hollow and the other solid, my premise is that the heavy G&L bridge has more affect on the balance of the semi-hollow body than it does on the solid.

 

 

Ah ha. I was unaware that the hollowing out of the ASAT occurred mainly above the center of gravity of the instrument. I see your point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Ah ha. I was unaware that the hollowing out of the ASAT occurred mainly above the center of gravity of the instrument. I see your point.

I could be very wrong here. I'm taking a guess where the biggest chunk has been removed. Hmmm. I'm going to visit the local G&L dealer and see if they have one. I am very curious now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

My Lakland Hollowbody has an oversized body explicitly to counteract what would otherwise be a neck heavy design. The removing of material from the body causes more of a neckdive problem. However, the Lakland is a true hollowbody, with the entire body being hollow. Therefore most of the material "removed" occurs below the CG.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...