Members chris-dax Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 hmmmmm...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators ThudMaker Posted November 1, 2007 Moderators Share Posted November 1, 2007 That's a good find. Ron Paul has obviously worked very hard through the years to maintain his good name and reputation. There is no way his campaign has anything to do with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members stevenr Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 It seems at least one of them is. Perhaps there are more. Not this one, however. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Bass8987 Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Ron Paul ftw!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members chris-dax Posted November 1, 2007 Author Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 It seems at least one of them is. Perhaps there are more. Not this one, however. Nothing personal, my friend....it was a good natured troll Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Jugghaid Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Somehow I doubt he had anything at all to do with this. I mean Christ, look at the grammar here: Ron Paul is for the people, unless you want your children to have human implant RFID chips, a National ID card and create a North American Union and see an economic collapse far worse than the great depression. Vote for Ron Paul he speaks the truth and the media and government is afraid of him. I'm sure his people can write a BIT better than that. And yes, I am planning on voting for him. For once I won't feel like it's a "lesser of 2 evils" vote either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Captain Fathead Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 well, he IS a politician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RSBro Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Check the replies at the bottom. Already busted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators ThudMaker Posted November 1, 2007 Moderators Share Posted November 1, 2007 Check the replies at the bottom. Already busted. Are you sure? It looks like the postings on that forum website were done by a noob. Perhaps that is a conspiracy, too. I'm going to withhold judgment of any sort until I see real proof here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Captain Fathead Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 I googled it. There's a bunch of weird links, and then a fox link. didn't read the article, but the headline is "Ron Paul MIGHT be using botnets." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,307056,00.html It's fox, so I took it with a grain of salt. Nothing I could find on CNN, NBC or BBC. The bottom of the wired article also has this quote: "This article has been modified to clarify that Warner has seen no evidence suggesting that the Paul campaign is responsible for the spam." I dunno. As I said, it wouldn't surprise me, but none of the articles really seem to be accurate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RSBro Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Are you sure? It looks like the postings on that forum website were done by a noob. Perhaps that is a conspiracy, too. I'm going to withhold judgment of any sort until I see real proof here. Paul doesn't need to do that. McCain, maybe, or others. Paul is gaining popularity left and right from all over. Frankly, from a website like "Wired" or anything online OR print nowadays, I really don't believe it. I'll go on his years of honesty, integrity and character as a Congressman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members chris-dax Posted November 1, 2007 Author Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 I googled it. There's a bunch of weird links, and then a fox link. didn't read the article, but the headline is "Ron Paul MIGHT be using botnets." It's fox, so I took it with a grain of salt. The bottom of the wired article also has this quote: "This article has been modified to clarify that Warner has seen no evidence suggesting that the Paul campaign is responsible for the spam." I said Paul supporters, not the Paul campaign.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators ThudMaker Posted November 1, 2007 Moderators Share Posted November 1, 2007 Paul doesn't need to do that. McCain, maybe, or others. Paul is gaining popularity left and right from all over. Frankly, from a website like "Wired" or anything online OR print nowadays, I really don't believe it. I'll go on his years of honesty, integrity and character as a Congressman. No, dude. I've already pointed out Ron Paul's intergrity in the second post here. I'm talking about the writer being paid off by Guiliani. I want to see the proof of that before I believe it. The poster on that public forum had 3 posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Captain Fathead Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 OMGODZOR LEFTWING MEDIACONPIRACYEVERYONE DIES AU*AUAUGILSDHLL:HSDHKFKLGHL:SDKHGLDH I mean, Fox news is the most reputable source of News out there. Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators ThudMaker Posted November 1, 2007 Moderators Share Posted November 1, 2007 OMGODZOR LEFTWING MEDIACONPIRACYEVERYONE DIES AU*AUAUGILSDHLL:HSDHKFKLGHL:SDKHGLDH I mean, Fox news is the most reputable source of News out there. Yes. The Communist News Network is so much better.:poke: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Captain Fathead Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 The Communist News Network is so much better.:poke: I just watch the daily show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators ThudMaker Posted November 1, 2007 Moderators Share Posted November 1, 2007 I just watch the daily show Nice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members chris-dax Posted November 1, 2007 Author Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 OMGODZOR LEFTWING MEDIACONPIRACYEVERYONE DIES AU*AUAUGILSDHLL:HSDHKFKLGHL:SDKHGLDH I mean, Fox news is the most reputable source of News out there. Yes. Reputation is in the eye of the beholder.... I'll put Fox's reporting accuracy, journalistic standards, and news judgment up against any of their peers all day long.... Have you not been paying attention to the disgraces recently befalling your beloved CBS and NYT. Come on dude....CNN was selling out to sadaam for office space in Bagdad.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Captain Fathead Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Reputation is in the eye of the beholder....I'll put Fox's reporting accuracy, journalistic standards, and news judgment up against any of their peers all day long....Have you not been paying attention to the disgraces recently befalling your beloved CBS and NYT.Come on dude....CNN was selling out to sadaam for office space in Bagdad.... That's why I tried to find information from more than one source. If fox says something, and no one else picks up the story, i get supsicious. Same with cnn, nbc, bbc, bladeblaabla. I actually don't watch CBS or read the NY times, except for the arts section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Thumper Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RSBro Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 No, dude. I've already pointed out Ron Paul's intergrity in the second post here. I'm talking about the writer being paid off by Guiliani. I want to see the proof of that before I believe it. The poster on that public forum had 3 posts. Haha ok then. Honestly, Rudi is cool and all, but honestly he ain't THAT smart... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Super_Donut_Man Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 I aint voting for anybody but myself. That way I can complain about anybody that gets elected And when people ask me did I vote, I will say yes, and they ask who, I will say its my own business. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RSBro Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 I aint voting for anybody but myself. That way I can complain about anybody that gets elected And when people ask me did I vote, I will say yes, and they ask who, I will say its my own business. Yep! Then you and the other millions of non voters can complain with a common theme. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moderators ThudMaker Posted November 1, 2007 Moderators Share Posted November 1, 2007 Haha ok then. Honestly, Rudi is cool and all, but honestly he ain't THAT smart... I don't see it being one of his competitors. The more press Paul gets (even bad press) the more name recognition/free advertising for him. I think it's a Libertarian computer hack or two spamming everywhere or because he's energized folks who associate themselves with Libertarianism and they are posting everywhere frequently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Super_Donut_Man Posted November 1, 2007 Members Share Posted November 1, 2007 Yep! Then you and the other millions of non voters can complain with a common theme. But you failed to realize that I DID vote. Just not for a popular candidate. Its fail proof. I win and I can bitch all I want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.