Jump to content

what is it that you think is so great about rickenbacker basses?


Stella Joop

Recommended Posts

  • Members

I have the same issue to a degree. Not about the things you mention, but the neck... the 4001s felt great but tend to come apart if fitted with roundwounds and mishandled - and so many of them were. I'd never buy one off eBay because odds are the fingerboard is separating from the neck up top by the nut. And the 4003s, until recently, had too much thickness in the neck to play comfortably.

The recent 4003s get it right in every respect. One day I WILL get one, in fireglo.

I really want to like Ric's more than I do, but I just can't get along with them enough playing-wise to ever buy one. They look cool, sound good, but that's it for me. If they could improve the ridiculously, stupidly huge pup route and sharp metal surround, make a fully adjustable bridge and still keep the looks and vibe, then maybe. But they won't.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

 

loved the sound, until i tried playing it in a metal band tuned to drop-c. then, not so much.


couldn't really get into the feel of the neck either, but that's just player's preference.

 

Really? I love the growl in drop-C, but I could see that you might want something more bassy in your situation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Personally I love the sound and the look. There is nothing else like it.

For such an expensive instrument now days though, there are too many negatives with the 4003 model.

1. The rear pickup mount and cover. Removing the cover exposes some umpleasantly sharp edges which don't feel too good on the plucking fingers.
2. The bridge is just retarded. You have to loosten the strings and tilt the entire rear side up to make intonation adjustments.
3. The nut is cut for light gage strings only.

For the money, they should do better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
Personally I love the sound and the look. There is nothing else like it.


For such an expensive instrument now days though, there are too many negatives with the 4003 model.


1. The rear pickup mount and cover. Removing the cover exposes some umpleasantly sharp edges which don't feel too good on the plucking fingers.

2. The bridge is just retarded. You have to loosten the strings and tilt the entire rear side up to make intonation adjustments.

3. The nut is cut for light gage strings only.


For the money, they should do better.




1) It's not their fault you don't play the bass in it's original form
2) absolutely agree
3) nut slots should be cut for the guage you are using. If they cut them wide, you would have a sloppy fit if you wanted to go narrow. You can file a nut, but it's a lot harder to "unfile" one. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

img0120tn0.jpg

 

my bass took a bit of tweaking to get a good sound out of it (given that it's a fretless and i wanted a completely different sound from it). i almost considered flipping it on the bay a few days after i got it, but i figured that i should give it a bit more time since i waited so long for it.

 

i'm about 90% satisfied with my tone. unlike most of you, i solely use the bass pickup and i roll the tone almost all of the way down, but still enough to get a bit of zing when i need it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

i want to know. i dont doubt they are great, i just havent spent any quality time with one.

 

 

The neck is perfect for me. That is, the neck on the 4001 and 4003 models. I don't care as much for the neck on the 4004Cii, and the neck on the 3001 feels just like a Precision, not to my taste at all. The neck-through construction gives it a solid feel and sound that I haven't found on other basses. That's it for me. I like the pickups, but I like Bartolinis more. I've used the Ric-O-Sound, and I don't think anyone but me ever noticed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators

I really want to like Ric's more than I do, but I just can't get along with them enough playing-wise to ever buy one. They look cool, sound good, but that's it for me. If they could improve the ridiculously, stupidly huge pup route and sharp metal surround, make a fully adjustable bridge and still keep the looks and vibe, then maybe. But they won't.

 

 

They already have: http://www.rickenbacker.com/model.asp?model=4004Cii

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Aw! When I opened this thread I didn't expect to read that!!
:)
:)
:)

Rics just have this gorgeous piano-like tone that takes grit well and they play like butter. Here's my little family:

4003.jpg
4001.jpg
fretless.jpg



Do you notice any difference in tone between the half inch and one inch pickup placement?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
1) It's not their fault you don't play the bass in it's original form

2) absolutely agree

3) nut slots
should
be cut for the guage you are using. If they cut them wide, you would have a sloppy fit if you wanted to go narrow. You can file a nut, but it's a lot harder to "unfile" one.
:D



Besides, Ric recommends light gauge strings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
The neck is perfect for me.




When I was kicking around the idea of getting a Ric a while back, I had mentioned that my Jazz bass "felt like home". You said that I probably wouldn't dig the Ric as much, if that was the case. After having a Ric for several months, now, I have to say, I much prefer the feel of the Ric's neck. :eek::thu: It's hard to beat the Jazz from about frets 1 thru 5 or 6. But after that, the prize goes hands down to the Ric. It's amazing how good that instrument feels all the way up the neck. It makes my Jazz feel very clunky up the neck.

To answer the original question: It's kind of an all-of-the-above sort of thing with Rics. The look, feel, and sound...they are additive to creat a "mistique", for lack of a better term.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
When I was kicking around the idea of getting a Ric a while back, I had mentioned that my Jazz bass "felt like home".

Jazz neck, Ric neck, both are fine with me. It's the other end where I haven't been able to feel at home with the Ric. I like to use it in the studio, but for live where I have to sing and perform at the same time, it demands too much of my attention.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
When I was kicking around the idea of getting a Ric a while back, I had mentioned that my Jazz bass "felt like home". You said that I probably wouldn't dig the Ric as much, if that was the case. After having a Ric for several months, now, I have to say, I much prefer the feel of the Ric's neck.
:eek::thu:
It's hard to beat the Jazz from about frets 1 thru 5 or 6. But after that, the prize goes hands down to the Ric. It's amazing how good that instrument feels all the way up the neck. It makes my Jazz feel very clunky up the neck.


To answer the original question: It's kind of an all-of-the-above sort of thing with Rics. The look, feel, and sound...they are additive to creat a "mistique", for lack of a better term.



So the Jazz neck no longer feels like home? That's cool. I liked the feel of my Jazz, until I tried a Ric.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

So the Jazz neck no longer feels like home? That's cool. I liked the feel of my Jazz, until I tried a Ric.

 

 

Admittedly, the Ric isn't exactly home. It definitely dethrones the Jazz for that position. The shape is awesome. I do still like the thin laquer coat on the back of the Jazz more than I like the painted and finished back of the Ric neck. The back of the Ric neck has not been at all tacky for me like some painted and finished necks have been. So it's still a win in my book.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...