Jump to content

Amethyst Initiative: Lower the drinking age?


Brother Mango

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 124
  • Created
  • Last Reply
  • Members

I know more party monsters between the ages of eighteen and nineteen than I do of 20+. Alcohol flows freely in those circles, definitely.

 

It's more of a novelty at that age. By the time you turn 21, it becomes mundane to drink like that, and if you start going out to bars, insanely more expensive. That's not to say that I didn't get super wasted and party hard after I was of age, I just didn't do it 5 nights a week anymore.:D

 

The issue is always going to be with responsibility and how young adults handle themselves and alcohol. There are plenty of perfectly responsible 18 year olds, but they're generally the exception. A lot of doctors argue that the brain is still developing at that age, as well...

C7

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I don't care about any of the comments in this thread or either of those links.

 

This is my beef. The government says it's perfectly ok for them to ship an 18 year old off to die defending the country, but says they're not mature enough to handle having a beer before they leave. I have a serious, SERIOUS, SERIOUS {censored}ing problem with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

{censored}ing problem with that.

 

 

I can't speak for all military bases, but all of the people I personally know who went to the military out of high school were allowed to drink while on base, regardless of age. In that situation, your argument no longer holds up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

drunk driving deaths went down dramatically when they started taking peoples licenses away.

 

/sigh

 

My quote in your signature isn't very amusing to me anymore... :(

 

/goes back to drinking vodka

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I can't speak for all military bases, but all of the people I personally know who went to the military out of high school were allowed to drink while on base, regardless of age. In that situation, your argument no longer holds up.

 

 

I'm a military brat and half of my friends are military, I am quite aware that they actually DO drink. But that is more the MP being cool and knowing what's up. The OP is about government regulation, as is my point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I just read about this, and I still don't know what I think about it. I don't know if kids get all jacked up on booze because they legally can't, or because they're just being kids.

 

Will lowering the drinking age to 18 really solve a problem? Probably not.

 

Maybe we should take a hint from Europe.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I'm a military brat and half of my friends are military, I am quite aware that they actually DO drink. But that is more the MP being cool and knowing what's up. The OP is about government regulation, as is my point.

 

 

I was told that it was legal for them to be drinking on base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I really don't understand the whole problem. Other than immaturity and peer pressure. I've NEVER had a problem saying no to drinking. Ever. I'm 20, and less than 4 months from 21, and have yet to ever have any more than a sip of wine at Easter or Thanksgiving. I'm told I can't until I'm 21. Ok.

 

If we're lowering the drinking age to 18, let's up the license age to 21! ;) Haha. Seriously. You don't see people bringing up the age of driving as a problem very much anymore. Pretty sure that's in the same boat. And honestly, if kids couldn't drive till later (or had MUCH longer and monitored driving "learning periods"), there would be fewer wrecks...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I was told that it was
legal
for them to be drinking on base.

 

 

Oh really? Hmm. I'll have to ask some people about that, but I know of several people being busted on base for underage drinking. From what I've seen, that take it pretty seriously, should you be caught in any official capacity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I seriously doubt that, unless the base was in a foreign country with a lower drinking age.

 

 

Again, this is entirely heresay. I have no clue of the actual rules because they have never applied to me (I can't enlist due to asthma and arthritis).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

And honestly, if kids couldn't drive till later (or had MUCH longer and monitored driving "learning periods"), there would be fewer wrecks...

 

 

Amen. That would have certainly kept a lot of people I knew, including a teenage L-1329, from damn near killing themselves when they finally get behind the wheel.

 

The drinking age, and driving age, should both either be lowered WAY down, or way up. Nothing worse than a simultaneous new experience and new found freedom for a teenager.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
:rolleyes: 18 agers already buy beer and cigarrettes in USA, i have bought beer and cigarrettes there, and im 19, i just showed my Mexican ID (which you can get at 18), and thats it, my cousin who lives in Arizona, is 17 yrs old and he is drunk everytime, my opinion is, approved or not, teenagers always find a way to get beer.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Are the 2 sides of this issue talking to each other?

 

One side seems to be saying that the higher drinking age only made a new class of criminals. Now there's a binge-drinking problem, and other unhealthy, unnecessary things that 18 to 20yr olds are doing.

 

The other side points to a reduction in drunk driving deaths.

 

They aren't talking about the same things.

 

If we want to lower drunk driving deaths, auto-makers should be required to make tanks for us all to drive. We can smash into each other, roll down the sides of hills, catch on fire, and drive into a lake, and there won't be any harm. Would MADD then support a drinking age of 12?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I was caught in the middle (hypothetically) when the legal drinking age went from 18 back to 21. I'd been legally drinking from 18-20, and then had to wait 9 months to be legal again in 1979. That never posed any sort of problem to me in being able to acquire the stuff.

 

I don't remember too much from those years, but I suppose there was some reason or other for the drinking age being raised back to 21. Never bothered to research it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

:rolleyes:
18 agers already buy beer and cigarrettes in USA, i have bought beer and cigarrettes there, and im 19, i just showed my Mexican ID (which you can get at 18), and thats it, my cousin who lives in Arizona, is 17 yrs old and he is drunk everytime, my opinion is, approved or not, teenagers always find a way to get beer.

 

People find a way to get black tar heroin, let's just go ahead and legalize it. :facepalm:

 

I don't want to turn this into a debate on legalizing drugs, but I am just making the point that just because someone gets it, it doesn't necessarily make it a valid point.

 

But yes, 18 y/o's will get beer anyway :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

I was caught in the middle (hypothetically) when the legal drinking age went from 18 back to 21. I'd been legally drinking from 18-20, and then had to wait 9 months to be legal again in 1979. That never posed any sort of problem to me in being able to acquire the stuff.


I don't remember too much from those years, but I suppose there was some reason or other for the drinking age being raised back to 21. Never bothered to research it.

 

 

The issue was over so-called "blood borders" like the line between Wisconsin and Illinois.

 

The 19yr olds from IL could go to WI and drink legally. Thus, the boundary was a supposed blood border because of the drunk Illinois 18 - 20 yr olds who were driving back from WI and killing people. The Federal government still allows states to choose their own drinking age, but if it's not 21, the state can't get Federal highway funds.

 

 

Was this something that our legislators chose? I doubt it. Organizations like MADD can easily make a legislator look "anti-babies" by saying, "here's a photo of a baby who was killed by a drunk driver. If you don't support a drinking age of 21, you're complicit in the death of this baby who never got the chance to go to school or get married."

 

What's a legislator left to do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...