Members mrcrow Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 was Jesus fully man, fully God or a combination of both
Members burdizzos Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 Best illegitimate child cover up, ever.
Members Zamfir Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 Hey! Nobody {censored}s with Jesus...
Members mrcrow Posted September 6, 2008 Author Members Posted September 6, 2008 Best illegitimate child cover up, ever. good call...had a father and mother...but seeded by a third party question on the trinity follows next
Members Rob Martinez Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 100% man, 100% god. The Trinity is not a math problem, nor is it a riddle. It is a mystery, meaning something we can always learn more about, but not know everything about. Debates about Jesus' divinity go back, hell, to his trial with the Sadducees. Arius, a 4th century priest, called Christ's divinity into question, claiming Christ was like God, or kind of God, but not equal to the Father. He almost succeeded in converting the whole of Christendom to this heresy, save for another priest named Athanatius, now a saint in the Church for combating Arianism. The pope at the time sided with St. Athanatius, and Arius was promptly excommunicated. So, for true believers in Christ, Jesus is both completely human and completely God. If not a believer, then a convenient target for lame jokes and someone to blame for other people's faults and shortcoming.
Members brake Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 This is going to get real interesting real fast.
Members bassgirl9 Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 I hate where this thread is headed.
Members Emprov Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 100% man, 100% god. The Trinity is not a math problem, nor is it a riddle. It is a mystery, meaning something we can always learn more about, but not know everything about.Debates about Jesus' divinity go back, hell, to his trial with the Sadducees. Arius, a 4th century priest, called Christ's divinity into question, claiming Christ was like God, or kind of God, but not equal to the Father. He almost succeeded in converting the whole of Christendom to this heresy, save for another priest named Athanatius, now a saint in the Church for combating Arianism. The pope at the time sided with St. Athanatius, and Arius was promptly excommunicated.So, for true believers in Christ, Jesus is both completely human and completely God. That's the church answer, put it in non-church terms. :poke:
Members Zamfir Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 100% man, 100% god. The Trinity is not a math problem, nor is it a riddle. It is a mystery, meaning something we can always learn more about, but not know everything about. Debates about Jesus' divinity go back, hell, to his trial with the Sadducees. Arius, a 4th century priest, called Christ's divinity into question, claiming Christ was like God, or kind of God, but not equal to the Father. He almost succeeded in converting the whole of Christendom to this heresy, save for another priest named Athanatius, now a saint in the Church for combating Arianism. The pope at the time sided with St. Athanatius, and Arius was promptly excommunicated. So, for true believers in Christ, Jesus is both completely human and completely God. If not a believer, then a convenient target for lame jokes and someone to blame for other people's faults and shortcoming.
Members Trauma_Luna Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 Jesus was a metal head.Dont {censored} with him.
Members brake Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 I hate where this thread is headed. I hate where it started
Members bassgirl9 Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 I hate where it started Hahaha fair enough! Lets just put our fingers in our ears and start humming this: [YOUTUBE]YevYBsShxNs&feature=related[/YOUTUBE] I'm all for debate, but people can't seem to stop fighting when it comes to Jesus. The irony of which makes me sigh.
Members Poltergeist Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 Jesus was the manisfestation of God in a human form.
Members Emprov Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 I'm all for debate, but people can't seem to stop fighting when it comes to Jesus. The irony of which makes me sigh. Religion and politics: the two topics to avoid if you want to make a good first impression on somebody.
Members BlueEcho811 Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 was Jesus fully man, fully God or a combination of both Fully man with a wonderful perspective on life.
Members danbuc Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 was Jesus fully man, fully God or a combination of both Well, kind of... As I understand the Bible, Jesus is the fullness of God demonstrated in the flesh on the earth to reconcile mankind back to his creator. Fully man and fully God...if not, His death was meaningless - But it wasn't!!! Thankfully, God has made eternal life free for any who would trust Him... Hope this helps Dan
Members Last in Line Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 +1 to Rob Martinez, Poltergeist, and Danbuc for the correct answers.
Members hi.flyer Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 "Help me in my weakness/'Cuz I'm falling out of grace"
Members Rob Martinez Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 That's the church answer, put it in non-church terms. :poke: Oh, in NON church terms! Jesus is total man! He's the Mexican guy down the street who works at the local community center, Jesus Garcia!
Members Muddslide Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 There is a lot of worth in the alleged words of the man Jesus. But let's not pretend he was divine. Nobody knows whether or not god(s) exist, but if they do, I have a hard time believing literally in the existence of the personal god Yahweh of the Bible--he was merely a god who became the patron god of some sects of ancient Hebrews. He's a fictional character with roots in earlier, different cultures. Just as the Bible is mythology, based on earlier, other mythologies (primarily Mesopotamian, Sumerian, babylonian, Greek and Egyptian.) The fact that the Bible is mythological does not mean that it is lies. The Bible contains a good deal of wisdom, philosophical "truth", majesty and mystery. But let's not pretend it's literally true. (Incidentally, the concept of the Trinity isn't even biblical.) Moreover, the story of a demi-god, born of a god or a virgin but taking human form, being martyred and then resurrected was old and common enough during the time Jesus is said to have lived to be considered an archetypical symbol. Dionysis, Osiris, Mithras and Romulus/Remus are only some of the earlier literary/mythological figures to whom many of these supernatural, divine aspects were attributed. To look at this literally is nonsense. It's indefensible and groundless. As a myth (a different, perhaps even higher form of "truth") it speaks to us all. The Bible does contain some history. So does the work of Homer. But it is far more of a mythical/allegorical/symbolic collection of writings largely culled from the beliefs of earlier cultures.
Members Rob Martinez Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 There is a lot of worth in the alleged words of the man Jesus. But let's not pretend he was divine.Nobody knows whether or not god(s) exist, but if they do, I have a hard time believing literally in the existence of the personal god Yahweh of the Bible--he was merely a god who became the patron god of some sects of ancient Hebrews. He's a fictional character with roots in earlier, different cultures.Just as the Bible is mythology, based on earlier, other mythologies (primarily Mesopotamian, Sumerian, babylonian, Greek and Egyptian.)The fact that the Bible is mythological does not mean that it is lies.The Bible contains a good deal of wisdom, philosophical "truth", majesty and mystery. But let's not pretend it's literally true.(Incidentally, the concept of the Trinity isn't even biblical.)Moreover, the story of a demi-god, born of a god or a virgin but taking human form, being martyred and then resurrected was old and common enough during the time Jesus is said to have lived to be considered an archetypical symbol. Dionysis, Osiris, Mithras and Romulus/Remus are only some of the earlier literary/mythological figures to whom many of these supernatural, divine aspects were attributed.To look at this literally is nonsense. It's indefensible and groundless. As a myth (a different, perhaps even higher form of "truth") it speaks to us all.The Bible does contain some history. So does the work of Homer. But it is far more of a mythical/allegorical/symbolic collection of writings largely culled from the beliefs of earlier cultures. Non church answers, please!:poke:
Members King Kashue Posted September 6, 2008 Members Posted September 6, 2008 That's the church answer, put it in non-church terms. :poke: Trust me, that's not actually the church's answer, nor are those "church terms"
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.