Members Bobby1Note Posted May 4, 2010 Members Share Posted May 4, 2010 I'm following a notch filter discusion on another forum, where some are suggesting you can use the -12dB(fixed) cut for "tone-shaping", supposedly because the bandwith is "adjustable". What say you oh wise ones? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members agedhorse Posted May 4, 2010 Members Share Posted May 4, 2010 The bandwidth is adjustable only if the bandwidth is adjustable. Is there a bandwidth adjustment? This is true only on specific types or classes of filter BTW. I do not like fixed depth notches except for crude attempts at feedback control. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Coaster Posted May 5, 2010 Members Share Posted May 5, 2010 that seems like a really radical cut. for example, i just did a recording of a large ensemble, and the largest eq adjustment i made was 1.5db at about 1 and 1/3 oct width - and it was a startling change to the recording. what is this -12db tone shaping for? a guitar and amp, or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Bobby1Note Posted May 5, 2010 Author Members Share Posted May 5, 2010 The discussion involved different D.I. boxes, (acoustic guitar) and one of the posters suggested that the 12 db fixed cut notch filter, could 'potentially be' used for tone shaping, "like a swept mid". Apparently the D.I. he's referring to, has in his words "an adjustable bandwidth". The width of the notch can vary up to two octaves. I responded much as Coaster says, suggesting that this type of fixed-cut device is really for feedback control, not tone-shaping. Also, that 12dB cut is way too radical for "tone-shaping". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members agedhorse Posted May 5, 2010 Members Share Posted May 5, 2010 For a very narrow (high Q) filter, 12dB/octabe might be ok but as the width increases that's way too much depth for most practical uses IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Unalaska Posted May 5, 2010 Members Share Posted May 5, 2010 I Like my DI's to be dumb and switchless if possible. Infact I like if most of the gear has the fewest amount of "user features" possible so it doesn't screw me up. I don't like smart gear: if it's a mic make it sound good with a good pattern if it's a cable then don't add transformers or switches if it's a stand then don't make it overly complex if it's a snake then make the numbers visible and the connectors easy if it's a mixer, well, make it complex if it's an eq, simple if it's a system processor make everything inaccessable (except to me!) if it's an amp make it with an off/on, limiters and light if it's a speaker then make it efficient, light and 2 i/o's if you're out front then only complement p Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.