Members Anderton Posted March 14, 2016 Members Share Posted March 14, 2016 Welcome to another Pro Review, HC’s unique interactive format. We encourage participation from everyone—users of the product, potential users with questions, and the manufacturer. The object is to make this an “open source” review without the limitations on space of print, the potential bias of having a single reviewer, but more importantly, to tap the expertise of the community to dive really deeply into what a product can—and cannot—do, so you can know exactly what to expect. For more information on what Pro Reviews are all about, please check out the FAQ. Hardware Pro Reviews typically start off with a photo tour of the unit, and a description of the basic specs. Fortunately, our very own Phil O’Keefe already did an Expert Review on Reach, and he pretty much covered that kind of material. And although I usually include a picture of everything that comes with a product, in this case it’s just the Reach unit itself, an AC line cord, and the Quick Start…so it’s not very photogenic. However I couldn’t resist including a photo of what it looks like without the metal speaker protection grille (which you can’t remove—this was a picture circulated by Mackie). So in real life, you won’t be able to enjoy the “Road-Warrior-Meets-Futuristic-Graphic-Novel” vibe, but I thought you’d want to see it. Nor is this going to be your typical Pro Review, because we’re going to try something different. This all started because I’ve been using FRFR (full range, flat response) amplification systems for guitar since 1968. I realize amps are great signal processors, but I try to get my sound before it hits the amp so I don’t have to deal with amp variables—and that way, I get the same sound live through a PA or going direct in the studio. This is also why I built a lot of my own effects (and why my QuadraFuzz included an analog speaker emulation). I started playing through keyboard amps, then plugging into front of house PA systems for bigger gigs, then segued into the Bose L1 as a “guitar amp” for live performance. Since working with Gibson I’ve been using the Cerwin-Vega P1500X because it has a 15” speaker for the main driver, so I don’t need a sub. I had been getting my sound mostly with laptops running amp sim software, however I’ve been quite taken with the Line 6 Helix (the subject of another Pro Review) and with it, I can have a single unit instead of laptop, MIDI footswitch, interface, etc. But I also like something that “moves air” in the studio so I can mic it, and when talking with Phil one day, he’d mentioned the Reach…then at NAMM, I met with the folks at Mackie and asked if anyone was using the Reach as an FRFR system, or for presentations or other applications. One thing led to another, and they immediately saw the Pro Review as way to explore all the ways to use Reach. So, here’s the plan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 14, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 14, 2016 The Plan We’ll kick off this review with my evaluating the Reach as a simple, portable FRFR amp. How well does it work live? Does it do what I want in the studio? Can using it with Helix replace—or at least complement—my beloved Line 6 DT25 and Peavey Windsor amps? Then after that, I’ll ship the Reach off to our esteemed hipster editor Chris Loeffler, who will evaluate it as a PA in coffeehouse gig context. Granted that’s more of its intended application, but I want to know how well it handles the task—how big a room can it fill? Is it easy to set up? Is the remote app helpful and useful? Then we’ll check out using it for presentations, like workshops and trainings. If you’re a gigging musician, you might be able to get another income stream by renting out your Reach (and maybe your live gigging experience) to corporate presentations, parties, and such. Of course what I’d really like to know is how well it performs on a cruise ship gig, but apparently there’s not enough in the budget to send me on a cruise to Hawaii to check it out. Maybe next year. But—and this is the most important part—if you use Reach, how are you using it? What kind of gigs are you using it for? What are your favorite features? What could be improved? Have you tried linking several units together to get more volume? Remember, a Pro Review isn’t just the voice of a reviewer, it’s the voice of a community and offers interactivity that goes far beyond the “comments” section in an article. It’s also a great place to ask questions that only a manufacturer can answer. People from Mackie will be monitoring this forum and standing by not just to answer your questions, but to do so without resorting to marketing-speak. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 14, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 14, 2016 Initial Impressions The Quick Start manual starts off with the usual multi-lingual Ode to Lawyers: “WARNING!! Do need eat. Do not throw into swimming pools. Not suitable as a means of aerial transportation. This unit has been certified under FCC Ruling 4,223,556 as a Class Q device operating in compliance with sub-section s(1.3.55)[ab]{derivative of the 12th root of 2}. If it causes interface with radios, turn off your radio. Do not dispose of by cutting into little pieces and feeding to pigs.” I don’t know if anyone actually reads all this stuff, but at least it keeps lawyers gainfully employed. As a public service, I’ll sum up these kind of instructions in all manuals for you: Don’t be stupid. On page 6 the lawyers go away, so you’ll find a couple of typical setup diagrams and a description of the controls. Apparently someone at Mackie got the memo that people don’t like to read manuals, so the instructions are short, concise, and well worth the 90 seconds it will take you to read and understand them…otherwise you might wonder (among other things) what the footswitch jack does. If you know that outputs plug into inputs (and are by nature impatient), you’ll know enough to get the system running so you can test whether it makes noise. However, it’s vital to go to Mackie.com/support to get info on the Connect app—this is a crucial element for getting the most out of Reach, as it allows for Bluetooth control over Reach parameters. It supports both Android and iOS, as listed in the accompanying chart. Note that the Android list is of devices that have been tested and known to work; however, Mackie expects Connect to work with any Android OS higher than 4.1. [ATTACH=CONFIG]n31710197[/ATTACH] While you’re online make sure to grab the Owner’s Manual, which is basically an expanded version of the Quick Start Guide (which is also available for download, as is a spec sheet). Although it’s easy to get Reach up and running, it’s important to understand the bigger picture and read the tips included in the full manual. So Reach is set up in my studio (and it was light enough not to be a problem hauling it up a flight of stairs), Helix is plugged in, and my Les Paul Standard is plugged into Helix. But we’ll have to wait until tomorrow for the results, because the lovely young ladies who live next door just got back from spring break, it’s late, and this is probably not a good time to see just how loud Reach can go…see you tomorrow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 15, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 15, 2016 Entering the Land of FRFR for Guitars The most important point to remember about a full-range, flat-response system is that all the tone happens before the amplifier. A lot of presets that sound fine going into a cabinet will sound like a swarm of bees going through an FRFR system, because the FRFR system will reproduce all those buzzing highs—if you’re used to an amp cabinet rolling off about 5 kHz, it ain’t gonna happen with a full-range frequency response. As mentioned, I’m using the Line 6 Helix so its cabinet emulations take care of the overall sound. However, the Reach does have four sonic signatures: PA, DJ, Solo, and Vocal. Here’s the frequency response. PA is the light blue curve, DJ the green curve, Solo the purple curve, and Voice the dark blue curve. Some definitely worked better than others. You might assume PA would work best, but it has a bit of a bass bump that settles down around 500 Hz, and somewhat of a midrange droop around 5 kHz. It’s okay, and much better for guitar than the DJ setting, whose bass emphasis makes the guitar sound flabby and undefined. On the other hand, the Solo option sounds like it was made for guitar. The bass response rolloff that starts at about 150 Hz doesn’t affect the lowest notes of the guitar much, but “tightens” up the sound considerably, not unlike an open back cabinet. Meanwhile, the slight prominence at 1-5 kHz brings up the “meat” of the guitar and increases articulation. As to Voice, it has less bass, which takes away some of the guitar’s power, and lacks the midrange definition of Solo. The verdict: Use Solo for electric guitar…I’ll be checking out my Gibson J-45 acoustic tomorrow. One aspect that was a bit of a surprise was that the big bump around 12 kHz didn’t really make a difference. I was fully expecting to have to put a notch in that range, but the reality is that real amps don’t have much energy at 10 kHz, and the Helix emulations faithfully reproduced the lack of response at that frequency. I even tried boosting at 12 kHz to hear if I could get it to sound sizzly, but no go. Conversely, cutting at 12 kHz didn’t make any difference either. As to volume, it was a long day and I didn’t get home to try out the system until around 9 PM. However, even at half-throttle it was still loud enough that I was concerned about potential noise complaints. I’ll try to get home earlier so I can see just how loud it goes. However, I was able to determine that Reach did indeed render the sound the Helix produced, and even without cranking it up full, it could get pretty loud. Stay tuned... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 16, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 16, 2016 Kids, Don’t Try this at Home One of the reasons I love doing Pro Reviews is because I never know what’s going to happen. Unlike a traditional review where you work with something for a while and then sum it up, what happens in a Pro Review is nearly real time. Life is always more interesting without a net I was able to leave Gibson early (well, at least early for me) and decided to crank Reach to the max back at home. Based on what I found out yesterday, I chose the Solo position, and dialed in a big-sounding Line 6 Helix power chord preset. I turned up the master volume all the way, then went to the individual input and turned it up. It was loud. As in LOUD. As in effing LOUD, to the point where even though I played at that level for only about a minute, my ears had the aftereffects for another 15 minutes thereafter. And, there was also no sign of breakup. Granted, that might be hard to determine in a guitar preset with distortion, but I can tell the difference between “good” amp distortion and “bad” overload distortion. As further confirmation, I didn’t drive it hard enough to light the overload light, so there was still room to go but I needed to modify the Helix preset for more output. I will say that the sound quality was surprisingly good. Reach wasn’t straining, breaking up, or acting weird. Now, I have to give props to the Helix, because it really does sound wonderful…but the takeaway here is that Reach didn’t take away anything from it. What I hear in my headphones or over studio monitors while recording with it is basically what I heard coming from Reach. (This bodes well for my plans to try miking it to get the sound of “moving air into a microphone” that’s a challenge for even the best modelers.) Anyway, I still don’t know exactly how loud Reach can go, and it’s not something that’s neighborhood-safe. So, there’s a slight change of plan. On the weekend, I’ll take over a room at Gibson that’s used for creating videos (and where I did all my Cerwin-Vega P-Series testing, so I know I can get away with volume). I can’t use this space during the weekday because there’s almost always someone in the building, and I really don’t want to be voted “Most Unpopular Guitar Player Ever” among my compatriots (even though of course I would never play "Stairway to Heaven"). However, this means that over the next couple days, I can download the app and get familiar with it…and I suspect this is an important part of the Reach experience, so I might as well get into it sooner rather than later. Meanwhile, here are a few conclusions… Even without additional testing, it's already clear Reach makes a fine FRFR guitar amp. It’s much cleaner and louder than what I expected for this size and price. I haven't tested it with bass or acoustic guitar yet, but that's on the agenda. I still don’t know how loud it can go...suffice it to say I’m packing Etymotic hearing protection (flat response and all that) this weekend for the next round of testing. I assume that Reach would become compromised at this volume if you wanted to put a whole band through it, but if each band member had one of these, you could make some serious noise. The relatively light weight is welcome. Very welcome. Placement matters. Ideally, you want to get it off the floor for the best projection. I won't be doing anything on the review tomorrow because I have several after-hours meetings, but I'll be reporting back on the app later in the week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Graunke Posted March 18, 2016 Members Share Posted March 18, 2016 I'm watching this for more info. I think this is what I'm looking for. I do acoustic shows in the summer time, and it bothers me that it keeps me off of my Harley. I want to find a portable PA like this, and a short scale guitar that I can strap to the back of the bike, and take it to gigs. I'm hoping I can see this in person soon, and check it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 18, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 18, 2016 App Time Let's take a trip to the App Store, which of course iPad owners visit every other day anyway to download the latest and greatest updates for various apps. I don't have a suitable Android device for testing the associated app, but I do have an iPad 2 from the dawn of time. If the app works with it, I assume the app will work with any later variants. The app takes up 4.6 MB in the iPad (including documents and data) upon first being downloaded, so the footprint is minimal. Every Reach parameter you can control is represented in the app except for the on-off power switch, and parameters that follow the digital paradigm to save hardware costs (e.g., one rotary encoder with switches to choose the various channels) are fully represented graphically. However, the app also controls parameters you can't access physically from Reach. For example, the physical Reach lets you choose one of four effects, while the virtual Reach can select one of 16. Having played with the Mackie 1608, I'm hip to the Mackie app live mixing style - big, bright faders and buttons that you can work with fat fingers, in a dark club, after misplacing your glasses, while being bumped into by drunks. Here's the main mixer for adjusting the four different inputs. Note the big Mute buttons, and how the fader for Channel 2 is glowing like it's on mushrooms because that's the fader I'm actually moving. You can also select an individual channel or the Aux bus. Note the Reverb Send fader, and the three-band EQ which you can't access from the Reach unit itself. And since we mentioned the 16 effects, here they are. Here's where you have access not just to the effects, but to the reverb return, monitor level, and master level. There are also several "system-oriented" screens. The list at the top of the image below shows what they are - Main EQ, Footswitch, Feedback (as in removing, not adding), Side Monitors, Phones, Memory, and the About screen that lets you know about the software rev and such. This one chooses the four main EQ curves, but note they're presets - you can't actually modify these curves. This is the screen for saving and recalling three different presets. You can turn the side monitors on and off via the app, although it's easy to do so on Reach itself. ...and here's one for when it's time to tune your guitar, or monitor while setting up without disturbing all the people in the audience who are buying drinks. Since the reason you have a gig is because the place where you're playing thinks the people who come to see you will buy drinks, this is very handy to avoid discouraging them from fulfilling their mission of keeping you gainfully employed. We're almost done showing the various app screens. Here's the footswitch screen, which is admittedly not very exciting, but does the job. And finally, check out the About screen. This isn't just about the software version, but assuming you have internet access, you can download the manual, go the Mackie web site, or order takeout. Well okay, you can't order takeout. But I'm sure you can with something else on your tablet. Now that we know the lay of the land for the app, we'll try to see just how loud we can make this sucker from a nice, safe distance. It will also be interesting to see what kind of...uh, reach...the iPad has in terms of controlling Reach from a distance, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 18, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 18, 2016 I'm watching this for more info. I think this is what I'm looking for. I do acoustic shows in the summer time' date=' and it bothers me that it keeps me off of my Harley. I want to find a portable PA like this, and a short scale guitar that I can strap to the back of the bike, and take it to gigs. I'm hoping I can see this in person soon, and check it out. [/quote'] Hey, thanks for chiming in! Remember you need to allot about 27" x 9.5" x 9" and I assume you'd need to balance it properly, but I think this might indeed be Harley-friendly. If you want to see it in person, this link will take you to a place on the Mackie site for entering your zip code to find the nearest dealer. But your question raises a question, and I hope someone from Mackie is reading this and can respond. I realize you can lug Reach around in its designer cardboard box, but a carrying bag with handles, like what Bose does, might make for a useful accessory...something you could zip up after the gig so Reach's exterior doesn't get scratched & weird. Anyone from Mackie care to take this question? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted March 18, 2016 Share Posted March 18, 2016 I think a carrying bag for the Mackie Reach would be an excellent accessory! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mackie Gear Posted March 18, 2016 Members Share Posted March 18, 2016 Hey, thanks for chiming in! Remember you need to allot about 27" x 9.5" x 9" and I assume you'd need to balance it properly, but I think this might indeed be Harley-friendly. If you want to see it in person, this link will take you to a place on the Mackie site for entering your zip code to find the nearest dealer. But your question raises a question, and I hope someone from Mackie is reading this and can respond. I realize you can lug Reach around in its designer cardboard box, but a carrying bag with handles, like what Bose does, might make for a useful accessory...something you could zip up after the gig so Reach's exterior doesn't get scratched & weird. Anyone from Mackie care to take this question? We do have a bag on the way that you will be able to purchase from any authorized Mackie dealer. You can see a list of a few dealers here http://bit.ly/1UngQqf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 18, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 18, 2016 We do have a bag on the way that you will be able to purchase from any authorized Mackie dealer. Glad to hear it, that's a much more elegant solution than the blanket I used to wrap the Reach before putting it in my back seat...! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 20, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 20, 2016 Bluetooth Time Time to test the Bluetooth, which I did with an iPad. It all went well…as soon as I remembered that once Reach discovered the iPad, I had to touch the Reach entry under the Bluetooth settings for the two to pair. However, for some reason the Connect app refused to open…it just said “waiting.” I thought perhaps this was because after I downloaded it, I selected “demo” mode. So, I deleted the app, and re-installed. After that, it worked fine. Do remember that Reach remembers your settings, which on one hand it desirable if you have your settings for a recurring gig, but if for example you were playing the Reach REALLY LOUD somewhere, then brought it back home, set it up, and turned on the system without thinking, all those REALLY LOUD settings were still intact. So after the system is set up, I’ve gotten into the habit of turning on Reach and then turning down the volume before doing anything else. In terms of working the faders, you will hear that the faders are quantized into steps if you move them while something is playing. This isn’t a huge deal in live performance, but you need to be aware of this. Perhaps a future revision of the app could interpolate between steps (the old Panasonic DA7 digital mixer did this to turn 127 MIDI controller steps into 1,024 steps so you couldn’t hear the quantized levels when moving the faders). The faders are good about not responding to “false positives”—you need to touch the fader positively, and then move it. One feature I truly appreciate (although others might not agree) is you can’t tap somewhere along the fader travel, and have the fader jump to where you tapped. While this could have its uses, it would increase the odds of a potential “level accident” happening. However, it might make a good preference for situations where whoever is mixing has a stable setup, and isn’t moving around a club or being jostled by clubgoers. As to how loud I could get it…well, I’m glad I brought hearing protection, because it really is as loud as a typical mid-sized combo amp when you crank it up. Of course, one big difference is the tone doesn’t change when you crank it. Also, I found that using the EQ to kill the highs gave a sweeter tone, which is to be expected. You'll note from the meters that Reach is pretty much maxing out here. However there was also a bit of a surprise when used as a guitar amp, which I’ll cover in the next post. What I'll say for now is after the "volume test," my opinion of Reach as an FRFR guitar has gone up another notch. It's really quite impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 21, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 21, 2016 Controlled Feedback One aspect I like about using a pole-mounted guitar amp is how easy it is to get controlled feedback. I first found this out when playing through the original Bose L1 cylinder speaker, where placing the neck in parallel with the speaker make it easy to do feedback. Reach is great with feedback, and even when it was sitting on the floor, because of the sheer volume it can create it was easy to do controlled feedback. Granted, I was playing through a high-gain Helix program using a Les Paul Standard, which produces more "tonal" feedback than "squeals," so I had an unfair advantage. Still, even at reasonable volume levels, it wasn't hard to get great feedback effects. It's also possible to get feedback at low volumes if you touch the headstock to the Reach cabinet...it's almost like having a Sustainiac or E-Bow in the picture. (This is a trick I use when jamming with DJs - not only are sustained sounds helpful when transitioning from one song to the next, but visually speaking it's a crowd-pleaser ). This got me curious to see what the Reach's Feedback Eliminator would do. I had no idea what to expect because of course, a mic feeding back is different from six strings vibrating at various fundamental and harmonic frequencies. I need to check this out further to see if there's a way to get predictable results, but I did notice that when the first bit of feedback at a relatively low frequency hit, the Reach app indeed showed a notch at that frequency. This made it easier to concentrate on getting feedback with the higher tones. However because Reach is continuously scanning for feedback, and what I was doing was kind of a moving target, I need to do more analysis. The Feedback Destroyer may or may not have potential as something you can actually use with guitar, but it seems intriguing enough that I'm going to spend a little time finding out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 22, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 22, 2016 Phantom Power? By the way...although so far I've been testing Reach as a guitar amp, I've been trying out some mics with it. Note that Reach does not provide +48V phantom power, so you need to use dynamic mics. Granted, condenser mics are not a popular choice for most live situations, but I felt this was worth mentioning. Back to the feedback...by the way, note that you can subscribe to this thread and get an email notification when there's a new post. Just click on the "+ Subscribe" button toward the upper right, above the first post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mikey64 Posted March 24, 2016 Members Share Posted March 24, 2016 I saw this on the Mackie site, this review is great because I'm considering a Reach. I have a question, my act is guitar, mic, and sometimes a Beat Buddy on some songs. You always talk about using guitar with a Helix. Can I plug elecrtric guitar directly into the Reach? I hope you can answer my question. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 24, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 24, 2016 Thanks for commenting, and welcome to the thread...excellent question, but spoiler alert: the answer is yes...and no. Mackie lists the input impedance of the 1/4" tip/sleeve input as 400k ohms, which is sufficiently high to avoid loading down pickups. However, an electric guitar with standard passive pickups doesn't produce enough level to drive the Mackie Reach to the levels of which it is capable. It's more than enough for practicing, songwriting, or doing low-volume rehearsals but if you want to truly annoy the neighbors, you need to use an effects pedal, preamp, multieffects, or something else that boosts the level. Driving Reach with a Gibson 2015 Les Paul Standard, I again favored the Reach's Solo position but also, did a little trimming using the EQ. The following shot from the Connect app shows a little mid boost for articulation, a bit of a bass cut to tighten up the low end, and a very slight treble boost. Note that because the guitar by itself doesn't really push the input stage, there's more hiss than you'd expect, so you don't want to increase the highs too much. Also, the meter shows that the input isn't really pushing the input very hard. And since we're talking about the EQ, I should mention that the three-band EQ is per-channel, and as far as I can tell, can be adjusted only from within the app; there aren't any accessible hardware controls for EQ adjustment. This is different from the four "global" EQ modes, which affect the entire system and can be adjusted at the Reach itself or via the app. So the bottom line is...if you want to push Reach to the max with guitar, you want more signal going into it than a guitar can produce all by itself. But for practicing and those times when you feel inspired to play and want to plug in with minimal fuss, Reach will do just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mikey64 Posted March 27, 2016 Members Share Posted March 27, 2016 Thank you. It sounds like for most gigs I'd only need the guitar but nice to know I can make it louder easily. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 28, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 28, 2016 How About Acoustic Guitar? I tried Reach with my Gibson J-45. It’s the only acoustic guitar I own, but I think my experience would be similar to other acoustic guitars, and my conclusions are about the same as for electric guitar. However I did prefer using the Voice global EQ setting. It wasn’t a huge difference compared to the Solo setting, but the reduced response in the lower mids from 100 to 300 Hz tightened up the low end a bit. What’s really interesting here is the Feedback Destroyer’s behavior. Compared to the Les Paul, which at a suitably high volume can do great controlled feedback (not exactly what the Feedback Destroyer was intended to counter), being an acoustic guitar the J-45 had a natural body resonance and I was able to get consistent feedback from it if the level was high enough. So I tapped the Feedback Destroyer button in the app, and was somewhat surprised by its effectiveness. The process works in steps – it applies a notch and if the feedback persists, it increases the notch depth. In this case, there were three steps before the feedback went away. Because unlike an electric guitar feeding back the acoustic guitar’s primary resonance is fixed, once the Feedback Destroyer had done its thing, I was able to move around and change the guitar position without incurring feedback. This is a cool feature and I was pretty impressed. Of course it’s best to set up in such a way as to minimize feedback, because the feedback suppression is global, not per-channel, so anything else in the same frequency range will be affected. However, no feedback is definitely better than feedback! Also note that this feature is brought out to a hardware button on the Reach itself, so you can access it without using the app. (And speaking of feedback, now for something off-topic: In any Hollywood movie where a character is going to talk through a PA system, did you ever notice that there’s always a feedback sound effect at some point? I guess that’s the way to drive home to the audience it’s a PA. If anyone reading this thread ever sees a movie where a character talks through a PA and there isn’t feedback, let me know…it almost seems like it’s a Hollywood law that you have to do this ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted March 28, 2016 Share Posted March 28, 2016 Pretty much every movie I've seen where they use a PA, there is the feedback sound effect. I can't think of any cases where they didn't use that. I suspect you're also correct about the reasons why they use it Craig. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 28, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 28, 2016 Thank you. It sounds like for most gigs I'd only need the guitar but nice to know I can make it louder easily. I don't want to give you the wrong impression - I highly recommend using a preamp or other processor to increase the gain if you're going to do any gigging. Like I said it's okay for songwriting, practicing, and low-level rehearsals but if you turn it up all the way to get more volume, you'll also bring up the hiss. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 28, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 28, 2016 The Built-In Effects All effects are selectable only from the app, although there is a footswitch jack so you can mute/unmute them without the app, and an FX button the side can select among the Plate Reverb, Warm Theater, Tape Slap, and Delay 1 effects. Also the effects sends require the app for adjustment. Here’s your choice of effects. [ATTACH=CONFIG]n31717006[/ATTACH] Note that these have no variable parameters so you can’t edit any of the settings (other than the effects send and effects return, of course). The first eight effects are reverb-based, and while they’re certainly not studio-quality, they provide basic “bread and butter” reverb that can help add a bit of spice to a performance. I tend not to use global effects live because usually, the room itself provides ambience. The main value I see for these is choosing an effect for use with a particular signal source, such as reverb on the vocals. The other eight effects do what the names say. The chorus is very subtle; I think it’s probably good that Mackie erred on the side of being conservative, which can be said of all the effects. They definitely seem intended to provide a supporting role. Doubler works well with vocals, and Tape Slap is great on rhythm guitar if you find yourself doing a rockabilly cover tune . The three delays are basically just different times, and not really all that different, with a little bit of feedback to give a few repeats. Again, this is nothing that will “step on” the music. Reverb + Delay is the kind of effect you might want to put on background singers. These effects aren’t a primary selling point for Reach, which is probably why they’re relegated to being app-only. I think the assumption is that you’ll set up a preset with the desired effect, and use the footswitch to bring it in or out. I’d file the effects under “nice extra, can be useful.” In the context of using Reach as a flat-response guitar amp, I think it would have been really cool if one of the reverbs had been replaced with a spring reverb emulation—but I understand Mackie may not have been thinking “you know, this could make a cool flat response guitar amp.” As many electric guitarists have their own favorite effects, it’s likely the ones in the Mackie won’t suffice to replace them. However, acoustic guitar could be a different situation. Acoustic guitarists tend not to be quite so much into lots of effects, and if all you need is a touch of reverb or delay, then you very well may be able to leave the pedals at home. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Old B3 Guy Posted March 30, 2016 Members Share Posted March 30, 2016 Craig , I am a B3 and Pianist with vocals. My main gig is studio work and would mic this. I use a Hammond SK2 and do not play large venue's and if I do I would run the rig to a large system from the Reach. I also do a single where I have pre-recorded drums, bass, synth's etc.. My question is would the Reach work for this purpose? I do have a Mackie mixer so I have plenty of channels . As a quick aside , I've enjoyed your columns for years and have built many of your projects back in the day - Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Anderton Posted March 30, 2016 Author Members Share Posted March 30, 2016 I also do a single where I have pre-recorded drums' date=' bass, synth's etc.. My question is would the Reach work for this purpose? I do have a Mackie mixer so I have plenty of channels .[/quote'] Welcome to the review! I'm glad people are starting to interact. So far, I've only be exploring using Reach as a flat-response, full-range guitar amp in conjunction with effects that produce the "amp" sound and enough gain to drive the Reach to full volume. I do plan to try it with other instruments before sending it off to Chris Loeffler to evaluate with coffeehouse gigs, but I don't see any reason why it wouldn't work for what you do as a single. You don't mention the source of the pre-recorded tracks, but I assume it's either a General MIDI type of tone generator, or a portable music player or smart phone. Any of these should provide enough level to drive Reach, However, in terms of bass extension, note that there's a dropoff in the 50-60 Hz range. The Flat Speaker mode goes to 70 Hz then drops off by -5 dB at 60 Hz; the DJ mode goes down to 60 Hz, but it's by virtue of producing a "bump" around 90 Hz. Probably "Flat" mode would be best-suited for what you want to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Craig , I am a B3 and Pianist with vocals. My main gig is studio work and would mic this. I use a Hammond SK2 and do not play large venue's and if I do I would run the rig to a large system from the Reach. I also do a single where I have pre-recorded drums, bass, synth's etc.. My question is would the Reach work for this purpose? I do have a Mackie mixer so I have plenty of channels . As a quick aside , I've enjoyed your columns for years and have built many of your projects back in the day - Thanks Hi B3 Guy - welcome to Harmony Central! Since I've previously reviewed the Mackie Reach and have some hands-on experience with it, I'm going to jump in here and offer some thoughts on your questions... hope you don't mind. I'm assuming you'd be using it more as a personal keyboard monitor in live situations, right? For that, I think it would be a very cool tool. Run the keyboard submix from your Mackie mixer into the Reach if you need the extra channels. Send a feed from the submixer to the main FOH board and you should be all set. As far as using it in the studio, I'm not sure I see any particular advantage to that. Yes, if you like to do the "add natural room ambience" thing by running your electronic keyboards / samples through an amp / speaker combo and miking that up to give them some extra acoustical realism, I think it would work fine for that... but otherwise, I suspect a lot of people will continue to just run direct rather than use the Reach for recording purposes. One thing I think you should note is the relative lack of outputs on the Reach. You do have a Link Out jack, which I wasn't able to test since I only had one Reach review unit here, but my understanding is that it sends out mono feeds of Reach channels 1-4 plus 1/2 of the Bluetooth / Aux In signal, not a stereo submix, so it may not be ideal for sending a feed to the FOH mixer. For that, your Mackie mixer is probably the better option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mikeo Posted April 4, 2016 Members Share Posted April 4, 2016 How About Acoustic Guitar? I tried Reach with my Gibson J-45. It’s the only acoustic guitar I own, but I think my experience would be similar to other acoustic guitars, and my conclusions are about the same as for electric guitar. However I did prefer using the Voice global EQ setting. It wasn’t a huge difference compared to the Solo setting, but the reduced response in the lower mids from 100 to 300 Hz tightened up the low end a bit. What’s really interesting here is the Feedback Destroyer’s behavior. Compared to the Les Paul, which at a suitably high volume can do great controlled feedback (not exactly what the Feedback Destroyer was intended to counter), being an acoustic guitar the J-45 had a natural body resonance and I was able to get consistent feedback from it if the level was high enough. So I tapped the Feedback Destroyer button in the app, and was somewhat surprised by its effectiveness. The process works in steps – it applies a notch and if the feedback persists, it increases the notch depth. In this case, there were three steps before the feedback went away. Because unlike an electric guitar feeding back the acoustic guitar’s primary resonance is fixed, once the Feedback Destroyer had done its thing, I was able to move around and change the guitar position without incurring feedback. This is a cool feature and I was pretty impressed. Of course it’s best to set up in such a way as to minimize feedback, because the feedback suppression is global, not per-channel, so anything else in the same frequency range will be affected. However, no feedback is definitely better than feedback! Also note that this feature is brought out to a hardware button on the Reach itself, so you can access it without using the app. (And speaking of feedback, now for something off-topic: In any Hollywood movie where a character is going to talk through a PA system, did you ever notice that there’s always a feedback sound effect at some point? I guess that’s the way to drive home to the audience it’s a PA. If anyone reading this thread ever sees a movie where a character talks through a PA and there isn’t feedback, let me know…it almost seems like it’s a Hollywood law that you have to do this ) If you have to own one gibson acoustic it's a good one to own. Does yours have the Baggs Element pick up in it. I have an old J45 100th anniversary edition, it didn't not come with a pick up. Back in the day I had a Fishman Martin Gold pick installed in my J45 and my J185. The equivalent I believe is the Fishman Matrix or something like that. I will comment later on the Mackie Reach system from what I have read and seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.