Members LoveMyLesPaul Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 Can somebody explain the differences to me? I want a good nasty saturated lead tone with my Les Paul... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LoveMyLesPaul Posted May 14, 2008 Author Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 Anybody have experience with either of these? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Selmer Zodiac Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 This is Good N Nasty (Circa 1973) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jgyn Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 Mk II is more raw.Mk III (with tone control knob) is smoother. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members the Dust Posted May 14, 2008 Members Share Posted May 14, 2008 I have a MKII clone and its sound is very Fuzz Face-like. it has much more gain and sustain, less bass and more of a "bright" tone... it cleans up well with the volume pot of the guitar... well, basically, its a Fuzz Face with lots of balls... hope it helps... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members LoveMyLesPaul Posted May 15, 2008 Author Members Share Posted May 15, 2008 Thanks. I think I'll try building a MKII first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.