Members shredhead666 Posted May 18, 2005 Members Share Posted May 18, 2005 ... as long as both chicks are hot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members JKD Posted May 18, 2005 Members Share Posted May 18, 2005 Originally posted by shredhead666 ... as long as both chicks are hot. ....and a little 'bi' too? ;-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members travis bickle Posted May 18, 2005 Members Share Posted May 18, 2005 i second that motion, sir. and by the way, anyone who has a serious problem with gays in general has homo tendencies themselves. why else would ANYONE give a flying {censored} about what someone else does, period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members naskonja Posted May 18, 2005 Members Share Posted May 18, 2005 Originally posted by travis bickle i second that motion, sir.and by the way, anyone who has a serious problem with gays in general has homo tendencies themselves. why else would ANYONE give a flying {censored} about what someone else does, period. that or they are hardcore christians, and most of thoes i run into dont really know much about religion they just believe what people tell them to believe... not all but most... im all for gay marriage by the state, why shouldnt they get the same tax benifits and other benifites any other married couple would get? I think a lot of people look at it as in its against some religions ect but marriage isnt only about religion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members potaetoes Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 i'm anti-divorce... i guess that means i'd support a ban on heterosexual marriage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members ranalli Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by shredhead666 ... as long as both chicks are hot. Yeah, that's a real great idea....let all the hot girls marry each other so there's more dudes and ugly chicks left single.....GREAT!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members rho Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 I believe the ending of "Dodgeball" was one of the greatest ever movie endings in my lifetime... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members potaetoes Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by rho I believe the ending of "Dodgeball" was one of the greatest ever movie endings in my lifetime... and ben stiller is a lucky bastard... since that's his wife. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Romanian Reaper Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by shredhead666 ... as long as both chicks are hot. Man, you scared me. I thought I typed homocentral instead of harmonycentral. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members WonderMalcolm Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by ranalli Yeah, that's a real great idea....let all the hot girls marry each other so there's more dudes and ugly chicks left single.....GREAT!! This is quite possibly one of the smartest posts I have ever read on Harmony Central. Ranalli gets the gold star for today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hairydangler Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Sure why not? Then they should be able to raise children also. And pedophiles should be able to marry young children too. Whatever the case, lets be sure to push this wierd and unnatural agenda down the throat of the mainstream at the very least. I wanyt to see it in the news paper every goddmaned day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members potaetoes Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 you know... honestly... what's worse? gay people marrying, or ugly people breeding? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hairydangler Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by travis bickle i second that motion, sir.and by the way, anyone who has a serious problem with gays in general has homo tendencies themselves. why else would ANYONE give a flying {censored} about what someone else does, period. I love the morons that think it's really just a homophobic problem if you don't agree with them. Maybe "normal" people just don't want this {censored} in their {censored}ing face every day? Huh? Remember the "normal" people? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Romanian Reaper Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by potaetoes you know... honestly... what's worse? gay people marrying, or ugly people breeding? I'm from eastern Ohio on the border of West Virginia.....I can answer that question. Trust me, most of you on the forum would walk around in assless leather chaps before you would fornicate with some of the toothless wonders I'v seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members badtoneno Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by potaetoes you know... honestly... what's worse? gay people marrying, or ugly people breeding? Really man. Some of this white trash should be denutted and norplanted as soon as their genitals are capable of reproduction. Someone needs to put a stop to it. Three generations of idiots are enough! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members mulletman Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by potaetoes you know... honestly... what's worse? gay people marrying, or ugly people breeding? even worse, people breeding with an IQ lower than room temp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GYBE! Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by hairydangler I love the morons that think it's really just a homophobic problem if you don't agree with them. Maybe "normal" people just don't want this {censored} in their {censored}ing face every day? Huh? Remember the "normal" people? Yes, because two people being married and caring for one another is throwing it in your face everyday? Maybe, if you would stop beating off in the bush while looking through their window it wouldn`t be so "in your face." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hairydangler Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by GYBE! Yes, because two people being married and caring for one another is throwing it in your face everyday? Maybe, if you would stop beating off in the bush while looking through their window it wouldn`t be so "in your face." Oh so now the "normal" people who dissagree are repressed homosexuals? How did I know that was coming? That's weak {censored} there dude. It's in my {censored}ing face every day in the paper, on the news, everywhere. I didn't go looking for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hairydangler Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by GYBE! Yes, because two people being married and caring for one another is throwing it in your face everyday Oh is that what it is? I thought it was just so they could push the perverted agenda down my throat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members naskonja Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 normal people lol. in the 50's normal people didnt want black people drinking the same water or peeing in the same bathroom, normal people didnt want women to have the same rights as men, normal people thought anyone with piercings or tattoos was a trouble maker. whats your definition of normal? we live in this country that is suposedly free. i have a lot of gay friends, and none of them throw anything in straight peoples faces when we go out in public. actually most the gay friends i have are very successful and rich and very very down to earth and fun people to go drinking with. i agree the line has to be drawn somewhere, a man and a horse shouldnt be having sex but if 2 people are attrackted to one another and they both know what they are getting in to, then why hold them back? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hairydangler Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by naskonja normal people lol. in the 50's normal people didnt want black people drinking the same water or peeing in the same bathroom, normal people didnt want women to have the same rights as men, normal people thought anyone with piercings or tattoos was a trouble maker. whats your definition of normal? we live in this country that is suposedly free. i have a lot of gay friends, and none of them throw anything in straight peoples faces when we go out in public. actually most the gay friends i have are very successful and rich and very very down to earth and fun people to go drinking with. i agree the line has to be drawn somewhere, a man and a horse shouldnt be having sex but if 2 people are attrackted to one another and they both know what they are getting in to, then why hold them back? So go march in their {censored}ing parade then fanboy! But at least spare me the history lesson because this has {censored}ing NOTHING to do with slavery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GYBE! Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by hairydangler Oh so now the "normal" people who dissagree are repressed homosexuals? How did I know that was coming? That's weak {censored} there dude. It's in my {censored}ing face every day in the paper, on the news, everywhere. I didn't go looking for it. ....... Oh is that what it is? I thought it was just so they could push the perverted agenda down my throat. Yes, this coming from somebody who calls themselves hairydangler??? I think the only thing being flaunted in your face is their comfort with their own sexuality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members naskonja Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 either do black and womens rights... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members GYBE! Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by hairydangler So go march in their {censored}ing parade then fanboy! But at least spare me the history lesson because this has {censored}ing NOTHING to do with slavery. Same as being gay has nothing to do with being a pedophile, but you didn`t catch that one before did you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members hairydangler Posted May 19, 2005 Members Share Posted May 19, 2005 Originally posted by GYBE! Yes, this coming from somebody who calls themselves hairydangler??? I think the only thing being flaunted in your face is their comfort with their own sexuality. Bringing up my username is WEAK. Argument is officially over. Offf to work now fags. B-bye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.