Jump to content
HAPPY NEW YEAR, TO ALL OUR HARMONY CENTRAL FORUMITES AND GUESTS!! ×

classical guitar + p-90?


leftystratman

Recommended Posts

  • Members
Posted

 

Originally posted by riffmeister

you will need to put metal strings on the guitar if you want the pickup to work.

 

 

... which a classical guitar will not handle: no truss rod.

  • Members
Posted

On a classical you basically have three amplification choices:

 

1. Piezo under-saddle transducer.

 

2. Transducers glued to the inside of the top.

 

3. Microphone, set 6-12" from the bridge (and not in line with the soundhole), running to amp, PA or soundboard/PC.

 

Even silk and steel strings won't give good response with a magnetic pup.

  • Members
Posted

 

Originally posted by fastvfr

On a classical you basically have three amplification choices:


1. Piezo under-saddle transducer.


2. Transducers glued to the inside of the top.


3. Microphone, set 6-12" from the bridge (and not in line with the soundhole), running to amp, PA or soundboard/PC.


Even silk and steel strings won't give good response with a magnetic pup.

 

 

thaks for the useful response:thu: I guess I'm going to try something else.

  • Members
Posted

 

Originally posted by kwakatak

... which a classical guitar will not handle: no truss rod.

 

 

Neil,

 

I just got an Alvarez MC-90 classical, it has a truss rod. I think it is becoming more common to find truss rods in classicals. I have read quotes from a few luthiers who are now putting rods in their classicals because it makes adjustment so much easier. That said, putting steel, even silk and steel, on a guitar made for nylon is a strict no no, truss rod or not. They are just not braced for it, at least the decent ones.

  • Members
Posted

Originally posted by kwakatak

I honestly thought classical guitars didn't have truss rods because gut strings don't create as much tension on the neck as steel strings do.


:confused:

True, as far as it goes---but I've had classicals that sure could've used an action tweak, if they'd had a truss rod. I think it's a good idea to have one just for that.

 

Remember when Martin's dreads had nonadjustable truss rods because "they don't need to be adjusted"?

 

:rolleyes:

  • Members
Posted

I have a cheap Monterey classical and even it has a truss rod. It's about 5 years old, so maybe it's something that has been done with classicals in the last few decades. ;)

  • Members
Posted

Originally posted by kwakatak

I honestly thought classical guitars didn't have truss rods because gut strings don't create as much tension on the neck as steel strings do.


:confused:

 

In the past that was the rule, but since nylon strings need a good amount of room to vibrate, the neck relief had to be built in. If it ever needed to be changed, because of weather or whatever, it is a major deal. A truss rod lets the luthier build in a bit, then it can be fine tuned from there. A definite improvement IMO.

  • Members
Posted

Originally posted by kwakatak

So then,
can
these newfangled trussed classicals handle steel strings?
:confused:

 

No they can't. A truss rod gives you a certain amount of adjustment for neck relief, but it doesn't strengthen the bracing/design of the guitar.

 

Steel strings exert a significantly larger tension than nylon strings, and most (ie. 99.9% of) classicals would buckle/warp/separate with that much extra force.

  • Members
Posted

Originally posted by kwakatak

So then,
can
these newfangled trussed classicals handle steel strings?
:confused:

 

The fingerboard area of the neck is not the main problem with steel on a nylon. It's the neck/body joint, top and bridge area that are the most likely to go south quickly.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...