Members redpoint Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 I've had a Seagull for a year and a half. It's a really great guitar - I love the sound and look of the cedar top, but the one issue is that neck is a bit thick for me, especially when trying to do some chords where my thumb wraps around the low E string. I've been looking at installing a pickup, but given the neck width, I'm reluctant to invest money in a permanent pickup on a guitar that I'm not completely convinced about. I started looking around for other quality budget acoustics with thinner necks: and the Yamaha FG730S caught my eye ($300)http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product/Yamaha-FG730S-Solid-Top-Acoustic-Guitar?sku=519049 And the Walden D550 ($265)http://www.waldenguitars.com/steel/natura/D550.html Both have thin necks and sound and play pretty good. Am I just foolish for wanting to swap for another acoustic of roughly the same quality? It seems like usually people trade up to a nicer acoustic... Any advice would be appreciated!
Members DonK Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 What you swap for won't much matter if you don't find it comfortable to play. The Seagull has a wide neck (1.8" nut width), but I wouldn't call it thick. Ultimately, you have to decide what's comfortable for you, but don't confuse width with thickness; they're very different characteristics.
Members Cldplytkmn Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 wellllll... seagull is offering a thin neck version of their guitars now... down to 1.72 inches at the nut rather than 1.8... it might not look like a big difference, but i'm certain you'd feel it. It'd be worth trying to track one down to try out.
Members KATMAN Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 Personally,I'd keep the Seagull and save up for another guitar.While a strummers dream,the Seagull isn't,especially for those of us with smaller hands.I've played Seagulls and found that while I didn't like their necks for strumming,they were perfect for fingerpicking. I don't know if you fingerpick,but it would be a great oppertunity for you to learn since you have a guitar that is sutiable for that.
Members TimZ Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 I have two Seagulls, the M6MJCWQII with the 1.8 nut and the S6 Grand with the 1.72 and the difference in the neck is quite noticable. I have medium man hands and when I get out my '83 Guild G37 with the 1 11/16 nut it seems so easy to play but the Seagulls are also short scale which I find better for my size hands and finger length. While true it's more of a reach string to string I still like the combo of wide nut, short scale. Another point I posted on another thread, I have moist skin and rather soft calluses (even though I play several times a week) so after playing awhile my calluses collapse and the extra string spacing helps. So just a few things to consider. TimZ.....
Members BigRed51 Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 And the Walden D550 ($265)http://www.waldenguitars.com/steel/natura/D550.htmlBoth have thin necks and sound and play pretty good. Am I just foolish for wanting to swap for another acoustic of roughly the same quality? It seems like usually people trade up to a nicer acoustic...Any advice would be appreciated! For me, the best word to describe the Seagull necks is cumbersome ... and I too am a "thumb reacher!" Walden guitars are a great value. I have never played a D550, but I have played a D710, and have seen a couple of used ones on the market recently for under $250 with HSC. You didn't mention which model Seagull you have, but I can assure you that in my opinion, a D710 would be a huge upgrade in both tone, projection, and playability over any Seagull I have played, starting with the S6 and including some of the artist series. I have not played one of their "slim neck" models, as I have yet to see one in the local stores. The D710 has a solid rosewood back, solid spruce top, and laminated sides. If you're interested, try googling Walden D710. I know one of the ads was on the AGF forum classifieds ... can't remember where I saw the other one. In the 'new' market, you may want to explore the Washburn D10S ... it sells for substantially less than a Seagull S6, and has (for my style and taste) considerably better tone and projection .. for a laminated guitar. It is the Number One Selling Acoustic Guitar in the World, and was acknowledged by Acoustic Guitar magazine as the best guitar under $500. In addition, it has a limited lifetime warranty compared to Seagull which has one year on some parts, 2 years on others. In my opinion. and for my taste and style, either the D710 or the D10S would be a "trade up to a nicer acoustic."
Members johbren Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 Well let me put in my .02 I use to like the thin profile neck of some guitars like taylor and tacomas and my Walden g2070 has a neck identical to the taylors. it has a 1.75 wide neck. now for some reason as I advance into playing I like the seagull neck better. It fills up my palm better and gives me more control I guess you could say. However I play finger style. If you are a strummer then a 1.68 wide neck and smaller profile would be good for you. If you play finger style the wider the better.Ive noticed when I grab either of my classicals my accuracy is better and they have 2.0 in wide necks and are a thick profile. IN your case I would keep the Seagull and look for a Walden I got a b stock g2070 all solid wood and it rivals my buddys taylor 314. You can find them cheap on ebay if you are patient.
Members guit30 Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 I think Seagull necks are cumbersome too, my Alvarez RD20S has a very Taylor like neckJim
Members Cripes Posted January 27, 2007 Members Posted January 27, 2007 I played a Taylor 914CE today. What can I say *drool* The Seagull I have has a fairly stocky neck but I think it's fine for the strumming/flatpicking work I do. But, if you find it too inhibiting then trade it. I would. When I finally learned I didn't need to crowd my fingers onto a narrow neck I sold everything I had that cramped me that way.
Members TonyS300AD Posted January 28, 2007 Members Posted January 28, 2007 I got a Walden D560CE and it is a really nice guitar. The sound is great wit or without an amp, and I love the satin finish on it. It really wasn't to expensive either compared to what other guitars were for the same features. Just my 2 cents if its any help at all.
Members redpoint Posted January 28, 2007 Author Members Posted January 28, 2007 Yeah, thanks for the advice, everyone. I went back to the music store today, played a Walden D550CE, and thought, it was a bit better than the S6 I have, but not great enough to switch. But then they pointed me to a Blueridge BR-140, with a 1 3/4 nut (they said that this is now an option instead of the standard 1 11/16), and I think I've definitely found the guitar I want for the long term. It sounded really nice, by which I mean, my seagull sounds a bit muddier, though my strings are a bit older, I think. The Blueridge had a good thin neck, and I didn't even mind the funny looking pickguard. It felt a lot lighter than the Seagull I have, or even the Walden D550 (without electronics). I'm not sure if I like that or not. It does feel a bit more fragile, but maybe that's just me. But, it's definitely something to step up to. Now to save up for it!
Members guit30 Posted January 29, 2007 Members Posted January 29, 2007 Blueridge Br-140s are great solid wood guitars, interesting they went to a wider nut, with a thin neck like that, you can afford toJim
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.