Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 11, 2005 Members Share Posted August 11, 2005 I just bought the one in the attached picture, won't get it till Friday. I have never tried one, but the reveiws of the Hourglass Qall seem good. Closest thing to a PRS Santana I could find.Does anyone have one? If the attached picture doesn't turn out good, try this: http://images.andale.com/f2/118/108/5340921/1121655711005_IM008422.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Europa760 Posted August 11, 2005 Members Share Posted August 11, 2005 how much is that sucker? uh oh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 11, 2005 Author Members Share Posted August 11, 2005 It was a little less expensive than a PRS Sanatana III. OK, a lot less - $369.00 plus shipping. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members timmy210 Posted August 11, 2005 Members Share Posted August 11, 2005 It looks good man, play the crap out of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members cadfael Posted August 11, 2005 Members Share Posted August 11, 2005 They are great guitars. You really get a good bang for the buck. The stock PU aren't bad. The neck is fantastic. Enjoy!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members lechip Posted August 11, 2005 Members Share Posted August 11, 2005 I had one of these in red with gold hardware. It was an awesome guitar!! I sold it because I don't like gold hardward and I regret selling it. They are really nice sounding and with the coil taps are really versatile. I think you'll like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 12, 2005 Author Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Thanks for the info guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jmartin Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 I think you will like it a lot. I have a non-trem version,and plan to get a T model next-as well as another Patriot. Great tone,etc also the pups on the T model are a bit hotter than the P.A.F. types I have in mine. My only suggestion would be to get some Sperzels or the like just to keep it in real good tune.http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v662/shogun1/hqbodfrnt1.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v662/shogun1/hqdrgnfull.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v662/shogun1/hqdrgn1.jpghttp://img.photobucket.com/albums/v662/shogun1/hqbodfrnt2.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jmartin Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Also,I wouldnt compare them to a PRS,they are closer in feel and tone to a Les Paul Dual-Cut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jTreu Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 is it a real maple top or some kind of foto flame or something? Either way its nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 12, 2005 Author Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Hey jmartin,That's good to know. It will have a very familiar feel & sound then, I had a '98 Gibson Les Paul Standard DC a couple years ago. I didn't like the 24 fret neck or the chambered body, they made it head heavy. Shouldn't have that problem with the Hourglass's 22 fret neck & solid body. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 12, 2005 Author Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 jTreu,It's not a fotoflame. I read in a couple reviews of the Q that it is 3/8" thick maple, but it's probably a thin flame maple veneer on top of the maple. It will be here tomorrow, I'll check it out & let you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Europa760 Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 can a brotha see the headstock? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 12, 2005 Author Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Here's the whole guitar & one of the head. http://images.andale.com/f2/118/108/5340921/1121691003716_IM008418.JPG http://images.andale.com/f2/118/108/5340921/1123546603451_IM008426.JPG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members markas214 Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Those Micheal Kelly guitars look like they cost hundreds more than they a ctually do. They had one hanging with the Gibsons at my local music store and it really caught my eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jmartin Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 I know you will enjoy it then. It feels nice and solid,neck profile very close to the Gibby etc,yet still fairly light. Very sweet tones.The top is thin,but it is real,and -I think-is actually an ideal ratio to the mahogany body-makes for a very even,neutral response across lows,mids,highs-no one range is out-done by the others.Build-quality wise,it is -to me-as good as or better than any of the L.P.s Ive tried in recent years. So it is an incredible value for the money. Ive sworn off actual Gibsons now,since I can get a whole collection of these for what a single L.P. would run me.And still get the looks,feel and tone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members orourke Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Looks great, I've been looking for a guitar like that. I've been wanting a LP type guitar with a trem. The PRS's look good, but they really are overpriced by about a thousand bucks. And they seem like such yuppie guitars. The Santana's look good, but I don't really like those loud ugly stripped neck inlay's. I checked out the Michael Kelly website. The closest dealer in the Northeast is in Maryland. I've never bought a guitar without playing it first. But I will be in Anchorage, Alaska next week, maybe I'll convince my wife to let me buy one while where on vacation! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Zimphire Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Originally posted by orourke The PRS's look good, but they really are overpriced by about a thousand bucks. Let me guess, you are the type of person that just thinks the cost of the guitar makes up the price? I gaurentee you PRSs for the most part, aren't even close to being $1,000 over priced. Who are you trying to fool? And they seem like such yuppie guitars. Yuppie guitars? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members olbluzman Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 The whole Michael Kelly (by the way not even a real person) line was designed by Ben Chafin (former head luthier for Dean guitars for 10 years) while he was associated with Elite Music brands (formerly known as Mailbox music). The tops on the whole line of guitars is a "veneer" no thicker than several sheets of paper combined, this process is done while the wood is wet and allows the saw to make extremely thin cuts. If you like what you see in the Michael Kelly line check out Bens import line called the Chafin Volante: Ben also was the person who invented the sun sonic bridge that is used on Michael Kelly guitars. he also makes totally handbuilt USA models that cost 1/3 of a PRS, Gibson,or Fender Custom Shop. I own 3 Chafins and have a Volante on the way and am having a St. Croix built as we speak. Check out Bens website I assure you, you won't be disappointed. Chafin Custom Guitars Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members orourke Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Originally posted by Zimphire Let me guess, you are the type of person that just thinks the cost of the guitar makes up the price? I gaurentee you PRSs for the most part, aren't even close to being $1,000 over priced. Who are you trying to fool? Yuppie guitars? You've got me there; yeah I stupidly thought that if a guitar's price is $4600 dollars then it would cost me $4600 dollars to buy it. But let me clarify my statement. I think that the PRS models that are $3000 and over ought to be closer to $2000 and over. I don't think that's unreasonable. Given the workmanship, construction and materials, I think $1500 to $2000 is what a PRS should cost. I just don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members StatesboroBlues Posted August 12, 2005 Author Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 I just got the guitar. It looks even better than the pictures. The flame maple top is great, nice 3D effect even if it is a veneer. Later when I change the strings I'll take a pickup out & check to see how thick the maple is. I can't find any flaws in the finish. The back is made up of three pieces of mahogany so nicely matched that it looks like one piece. I've seen other guitars in this price range where not only the grain of each piece was different, the color was different. The guitar was setup good right out of the box. The action is lower than I like it, but still no string buzz. It comes with .009s, I'll raise the action when I put some .10s on it. The neck is a little thinner than the Gibson Les Paul DC Standard, but that's OK with me, I like it thinner. Played it a little through my Fender Blues Deluxe & Vox AD50VT, it sounds great. I have a pair of Gibson '57 Classics that I was going to put on it, but I'll wait awhile to see if I still like the originals.All in all it's a great guitar, I couldn't be happier. The quality of some guitars made in Korea is amazing. I sold my '98 Gibson Les Paul DC Standard after I bought a new $340.00 Raven RM2000 DC & haven't missed it at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members timmy210 Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Nice man, glad you like it. Now go play the shit out of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members XeroStar33 Posted August 12, 2005 Members Share Posted August 12, 2005 Originally posted by StatesboroBlues It was a little less expensive than a PRS Sanatana III. OK, a lot less - $369.00 plus shipping. Christ, I thought you were showing me a boutique guitar or something; I've never heard of the manufacturer. Now I want one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members jmartin Posted August 13, 2005 Members Share Posted August 13, 2005 excellent! told you you'd like it lol.Enjoy! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Zimphire Posted August 13, 2005 Members Share Posted August 13, 2005 Originally posted by orourke But let me clarify my statement. I think that the PRS models that are $3000 and over ought to be closer to $2000 and over. I don't think that's unreasonable. Given the workmanship, construction and materials, I think $1500 to $2000 is what a PRS should cost. I just don Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.