Call me whatever you want.
It's not a nuance, it's deciding whether something is a crime or not.
If I didn't think it was criminal, your point of view would be acceptable. But since I believe it's criminal, of course your point of view, to me, is unacceptable.
akliner's point is like saying stealing should be legal because you should have the right to decide whether to steal or not, and me wanting to prohibit theft is offending the rights of thieves.
You guys just don't get it, it's really simple. But I guess it's easier to call me names than to consider something so logical but so against your agenda.
It's a simple matter of taking away rights concerning those who disagree with you.We fundamentally disagree,don't legislate your preference for a lack of choice on me.
Same issue with civil unions,denying citizens a right based upon religious conceit.
As someone pointed out,the whole abortion issue is a convenient smokescreen/red herring trotted out every 4 years to obscure the real issues at hand.