Particularly to those who have attrempted to answer most directly and specifically, without going off on a recording lecture/tangent (Sorry, guys, but I see that occuring often on these forums, no offense!).
As a collector of much gear (and user of little, unfortunately) due to an eBay addiction, I actually have the Delta 66/Omni Studio combo and the E-Mu 1820m, neither of which are currently in use as I am in the slow process of building a computer and getting organized, with very little time available. I will probably use the Omni on my older computer (I had thoughts of picking up the 1010) with the 1820m on the new build.
My goal is quality production, what I would consider "professional" quality sound, based on the equipment available. I think most of us know what that means without getting transendental about it. Lots of unimpressive cookie-cutter music out there that basically sucks, recorded in big time studios with scads of expensive gear.
I appreciate every poster's time, experience and opinions.
As a side note, I live here in NJ Springsteen Country (when not orbiting the Red Planet), not far from his home. It is my understanding that Nebraska was supposedly a raw, noisy assed demo he made that he felt captured what he was after better than what he could subsequently get when the E Street boys became involved. Ultimately getting that creation to mastering level took lots of additional help. I actually dig that album because it's not over produced. As a big Boss fan, I think some of his music gets lost by being over produced/engineered and becomes muddled, without enough clarity and space, so to speak.
Live Long and Prosper.