Hated (yes, I know I know it's death), I don't know where you got your info from, but that is not the technique they teach in schools and books. I was lucky enough to be at Full Sail (before they started rushing people through just to keep the money flowing) and had Bob Katz actually come and talk to us about mastering. For one, there is no method. None. The method used to master a song is solely based on the strengths and weaknesses of the song. Questions like, "are the important dynamics empathized enough? Does a certain instrument need help? How's the sprectral image? Will sibilance be an issue for a broadcast?", all determine what should be used and where. Eq before or after compression will have drastically different effects, even when both have the same settings. Therefore, giving a set method just about those two (possible, but not manditory) processes is just plain wrong in itself. Not to mention, limiting, de-essing, dynamic equalization, stereo imaging...throw those all into the mix and a "method" becomes a scary thing. Besides, method implies you are fixed into one thought process, one solution, and if you or anyone settle into that, you will not be able to adapt and improve your skills after a while. Here's the deal. I don't doubt that your method may sound good on your system but there's a big problem that I notice happens to people all the time. I saw other posts of yours, not unlike some of the others here, and I noticed that your choices of gear where the cheapest you can get. If you are using Magix software and looking at a $30 toy drum machine, then you also are probably using your computer's stock soundcard and either headphones to monitor, or your computer speakers. Even if you are at a slight upgrade, say an SoundBlaster soundcard and some M-audio Monitors, you will still have the same problem. The problem is a quality fog that blankets your sound. This phenomenon is what causes people to say that a POD sounds just as good as a real amp, that Behringer effects sound better than Eventide and a Mackie preamp is not that far off from a Neve preamp. On their systems, they are right...I think most people would agree if they were there and listening. But that's only because the quality of the monitors, converters, room, etc. mask the "true" sound. The more the quality of the gear you get increases, the more you will hear the short comings of the gear that was just as good. It's happened to me too, but that's how I know. Your mastering method is victim to the same forces at work here, which is why an entire "forum of losers" is jumping all over you. And that is probably why you are so hot about this issue. "I mastered my songs like this, it sounds good, and an entire forum says I'm wrong. They must all be fools". The sad thing is man, is you've been fooled by your own gear. A-str8's stuff sounds very good on my system. The reason his sounds bad on yours is due to the fact that like all home studios, the imperfections in our rooms and gear makes us mix and master to sound good on our own systems, overcoming those imperfections. On your speakers, if you hear mud it's because your system is boosting nasty frequencies, and when you mix you mix to notch those frequencies out. I'm sorry, but you have been fooling yourself. When everyone disagrees with you, the whole world isn't {censored}ed. It's usually you.