Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.

Americans aren't making enough babies to replace ourselves!!!!

Collapse
X
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Americans aren't making enough babies to replace ourselves!!!!

    Americans aren't making enough babies to replace ourselves

    https://www.nbcnews.com/health/women...m_npd_nn_fb_ma

    There's a downside to this?

  • AJ6stringsting
    replied
    Originally posted by Grumpy_Polecat View Post

    It's complicated.
    (refer to verse 2)

    Lol, I have the Greatest Hits from Dr. Demento .... Has the original "Another One Rides The Bus".

    Leave a comment:


  • Grumpy_Polecat
    replied
    Originally posted by AJ6stringsting View Post

    The article does have a " Trumpian Dog Whistle " tone to it.
    Heck, I am from an endanger species of the Human Race.
    ​​​​​​My family left the tribal community back in the late 1940's, I can't intermarry into my tribe due to our limited genetic diversity.
    Heck, I ran into a gorgeous Comanche gal, here in California , she was highly educated , knew place her in the World, had huge boobs, hour glass shape, a face like an Angel and a sweet personality .... I asked her what was her last name
    Sadly, we were related.
    That's a real red flag waiving, telling you that you are s member of an Endangered Species of the Human Race.
    I wonder if this article is another Russian ploy to fire up the Segment of low intellect ( paralyzed from the neckup) Euro Americans in the Midwest, South or Central California .... It worked in 2016.
    It's complicated.
    (refer to verse 2)

    Leave a comment:


  • AJ6stringsting
    commented on 's reply
    Masturbation as birth control .... That'll keep the Child Support bill collector's away !!!!

  • AJ6stringsting
    replied
    Originally posted by guido61 View Post

    Only if one desperately hates the idea of immigration.

    If we don't make enough babies to replace ourselves, it makes it mighty hard to add a couple-hundred-thousand new jobs to the economy every month UNLESS we have a robust immigration policy.
    The article does have a " Trumpian Dog Whistle " tone to it.
    Heck, I am from an endanger species of the Human Race.
    ​​​​​​My family left the tribal community back in the late 1940's, I can't intermarry into my tribe due to our limited genetic diversity.
    Heck, I ran into a gorgeous Comanche gal, here in California , she was highly educated , knew place her in the World, had huge boobs, hour glass shape, a face like an Angel and a sweet personality .... I asked her what was her last name
    Sadly, we were related.
    That's a real red flag waiving, telling you that you are s member of an Endangered Species of the Human Race.
    I wonder if this article is another Russian ploy to fire up the Segment of low intellect ( paralyzed from the neckup) Euro Americans in the Midwest, South or Central California .... It worked in 2016.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom Hicks
    commented on 's reply
    that's not what my ancestors did. Yours?

  • Grumpy_Polecat
    commented on 's reply
    This post is LOLworthy.

  • thankyou
    replied
    Originally posted by oldsoapbars View Post
    Gents, this is a problem we can help solve.

    Let's get some Viagra and some wine coolers. The future is in our hands
    You don't usually make babies when it's in your hands.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fred Fartboski
    replied
    Originally posted by BA.Barcolounger View Post

    If you really wanted to reduce the abortion rate, you would support federal funding for sex education in schools, free access to contraception in schools, and allowing gay couples to adopt.

    But I have a sinking suspicion that you do not support those things.
    Jesus would certainly support them.

    Leave a comment:


  • flemtone
    replied
    Originally posted by Grumpy_Polecat View Post

    What forms of Gov't Assistance did we have in 1789?
    "Are there no prisons?"
    "Plenty of prisons..."
    "And the Union workhouses. Are they still in operation?"

    Leave a comment:


  • BA.Barcolounger
    replied
    Originally posted by LARRY L View Post

    As long as innocent human beings are being murdered off by the hundreds of thousands, it is not a questionable crisis.

    If you really wanted to reduce the abortion rate, you would support federal funding for sex education in schools, free access to contraception in schools, and allowing gay couples to adopt.

    But I have a sinking suspicion that you do not support those things.

    Leave a comment:


  • arf-boy
    replied
    Originally posted by Grumpy_Polecat View Post

    What forms of Gov't Assistance did we have in 1789?
    Welfare.

    In New England, we have local governments that predated the Revolution. Records surviving from those days show that government assisted the indigent.

    Leave a comment:


  • SteinbergerHack
    replied
    Originally posted by Red Ant View Post
    Did it really take this long for someone to point out that for most of those 200 years there was no such thing as public assistance?
    Well, it took different forms, but it's been around for a very long time.

    The church was heavily involved in charity work. Prior to the American revolution, the church tended to be closely tied to the government and thus acted as a de facto government entity. This is part of the reason we wrote our constitution to bar such entanglements - the mandated membership and tithing common in Europe were effectively another form of unrepresented taxation.

    Second, entry (or conscription) into military service was seen as a way to provide for unemployed but able-bodied men (and convicts).

    There are more examples, but you get the point.

    Leave a comment:


  • SteinbergerHack
    replied
    Originally posted by guido61 View Post
    Then you have to raise the wages so they no longer qualify for welfare.

    How do you propose we do that?
    That is not the only logical conclusion. In fact, it does not even work out mathematically, for a number of reasons.

    Basic economics 101 - pay for large categories of jobs will not exceed the market value of those jobs. Not now, not ever. No attempts by government to meddle with market pricing (i.e., mandated pricing of labor) can change this in a sustained manner.

    In short, if the market determines that the value added for an entry level part time stock clerk is less than your arbitrary idea of a "living wage" or a politically generated "poverty line", then the cost of that arbitrary lifestyle will ALWAYS rise to exceed the mandated labor price.

    This is basic supply and demand - 1st semester economics.

    Now, you may decide that socially you have a desire to artificially inflate those workers' lifestyles, but it does not logically follow that you have somehow magically inflated the market value of the jobs that they are doing.

    Leave a comment:


  • AJ6stringsting
    commented on 's reply
    Don't worry Badger, the Republicans and Evilvangelicals are working on a White Christian Califitical Jihadists .... Timothy McVeigh and Timothy Nichols were so 1990's, Trump / Alex Jones reborn Terrorism will make their presents felt very soon .... At a school convert or Mall near you.
    Don't be surprised if it's that White Nationalistic Neo Confederates in the South that want to hook up with Russians.
    Last edited by AJ6stringsting; 01-11-2019, 10:48 PM.
Working...
X