Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.

Looks like Kavanaugh wasn't the first to be targeted by democrats with bogus sexual assault claims....

Collapse
X
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Looks like Kavanaugh wasn't the first to be targeted by democrats with bogus sexual assault claims....

    Instead of peerless circuit court judge, it was a decorated warrior.


    Senator Gillibrand's hands might be all over this one.

    https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-...e-court-rules/

    http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/...519-story.html

    “At the time, the political climate regarding sexual assault in the military was such that a decision to disapprove findings, regardless of merit, would bring hate and discontent on the Navy from the president, as well as senators including Senator Kirsten Gillibrand,” Lorge added."


    The sad part is democrat stunts like this and DiFi's a few weeks ago give cover to legitimate claims of sexual assault.
    Last edited by nedezero1; 10-13-2018, 01:12 PM.

  • #2
    Link to bogus claims against Kavenaugh, por favor, mi amigo.
    Last edited by RogueGnome; 10-13-2018, 01:16 PM.
    Originally posted by Hoot Owl;n32354094
    If there were things available to make Trump look good don't you think he would have released them by now?
    To you I'm an atheist; but to God, I'm the Loyal Opposition.

    Comment


    • #3
      Dr Ford's claims seemed very credible. From the directions the white house gave to limit the FBI, I suspect they thought so as well.

      Thread premise fail.
      Last edited by Tom Hicks; 10-13-2018, 01:23 PM.
      __________________________________________________

      Is This Thing On?

      https://soundcloud.com/tom-hicks888

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Tom Hicks View Post
        Dr Ford's claims seemed very credible. From the directions the white house gave to limit the FBI, I suspect they thought so as well.

        Thread premise fail.
        Please explain how they were credible?

        Did she have her calendar showing where she was that day?

        Oh wait she doesn't remember the day, place, house, etc.

        Credible?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by nedezero1 View Post

          Please explain how they were credible?

          Did she have her calendar showing where she was that day?

          Oh wait she doesn't remember the day, place, house, etc.

          Credible?

          Your post suspiciously looks like a "prove it my satisfaction" demand.

          But that's not how it works. If you choose however, you may try and convince me otherwise. But I remain the arbiter of my conclusions.


          I will offer you this, so you might see for yourself how our varying conclusions compare with a sampling of our fellow americans.

          After a day of wrenching testimony from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford — who has accused him of sexual assault in high school — more Americans say they believe Ford's account over Kavanaugh's denials, according to an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll released Wednesday.

          https://www.npr.org/2018/10/03/65405...hift-from-1991
          __________________________________________________

          Is This Thing On?

          https://soundcloud.com/tom-hicks888

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tom Hicks View Post


            Your post suspiciously looks like a "prove it my satisfaction" demand.

            But that's not how it works. If you choose however, you may try and convince me otherwise. But I remain the arbiter of my conclusions.


            I will offer you this, so you might see for yourself how our varying conclusions compare with a sampling of our fellow americans.

            After a day of wrenching testimony from Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh and Christine Blasey Ford — who has accused him of sexual assault in high school — more Americans say they believe Ford's account over Kavanaugh's denials, according to an NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll released Wednesday.

            https://www.npr.org/2018/10/03/65405...hift-from-1991
            Ummmm... they sampled 1800 people. So it's not "more Anericans".

            Hardly a definitive statement of her credibility.

            There is however years of judge Kavanaugh's record which does speak to his credibility.

            Comment


            • nedezero1
              nedezero1 commented
              Editing a comment
              Umm...BK is on the SCOTUS and there's nothing you can do about it. So guess again who's mad.

              Either way I wonder if there's just as many people (who matter) who believe that Democrats are stretching yet again with the perjury nonsense, and his demeanor is likely viewed as understandable as well.

              Basically just dems throwing yet another tantrum really. Kinda like the whole Russian collusion nonsense that has cost the FBI close to a dozen of it's leadership.

            • Tom Hicks
              Tom Hicks commented
              Editing a comment
              Now that we settled that more americans believed her then him, we can talk about some other things you like to talk about.

              Its not really about what I can or can't do, if that is what you are implying. But if Ds take the house as seems likely, that mean committee chairmanships, subpoena power and a good close look what sure looks like perjury. We'll have fun. Just picture Hillary getting grilled and you will get into the proper spirit.

              And you finish with nonsense. I suspect even far right sources have talked about Mueller's success rate with indictments though.

            • nedezero1
              nedezero1 commented
              Editing a comment
              A percentage of 1800 people are not "Most Americans". I'll be glad to step you through the math explaining that in further detail if you'd like,

          • #7
            Originally posted by nedezero1 View Post
            Instead of peerless circuit court judge, it was a decorated warrior.


            Senator Gillibrand's hands might be all over this one.

            https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-...e-court-rules/

            http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/...519-story.html

            “At the time, the political climate regarding sexual assault in the military was such that a decision to disapprove findings, regardless of merit, would bring hate and discontent on the Navy from the president, as well as senators including Senator Kirsten Gillibrand,” Lorge added."


            The sad part is democrat stunts like this and DiFi's a few weeks ago give cover to legitimate claims of sexual assault.
            The perpetrator was convicted.

            This guy, Lorge, is expressing his OPINION that the conviction should have been dismissed. Lorge does NOT provide any evidence that the perpetrator was wrongly convicted or that the accusation was bogus. He only asserts that the White House wanted action on sexual assaults in the military.

            So, in summary, this is some guy's opinion.

            Comment


            • #8
              it's a scary time for boys

              Comment


              • #9
                Originally posted by nedezero1 View Post
                Instead of peerless circuit court judge, it was a decorated warrior.


                Senator Gillibrand's hands might be all over this one.

                https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-...e-court-rules/

                http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/...519-story.html

                “At the time, the political climate regarding sexual assault in the military was such that a decision to disapprove findings, regardless of merit, would bring hate and discontent on the Navy from the president, as well as senators including Senator Kirsten Gillibrand,” Lorge added."


                The sad part is democrat stunts like this and DiFi's a few weeks ago give cover to legitimate claims of sexual assault.
                How exactly did the Democrats target Kavanaugh, by wanting these serious allegations that were made by a prominent University Professor of psychology to be investigated?

                Although the investigation wasn't very thorough by any means, it did bring to light Kavanaugh's lying to the Senate Judicial Committee about his portrayal of his character during High School years, and while attending Yale, that he did drink when he was underage, partied and drank excessively, and that he appeared to have a very low and of women, and now has resulted in Chief Justice Roberts opening a perjury investigation of Kavanaugh.
                https://www.politicususa.com/2018/10...kavanaugh.html

                Did I mention that the American Bar Association is reopening their evaluation of Kavanaugh due to temperament?
                https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/...to-temperament

                You know that Brett Kavanaugh is most likely guilty of the accusations made by Dr. Ford, right?

                Comment


                • #10
                  Originally posted by BA.Barcolounger View Post

                  The perpetrator was convicted.

                  This guy, Lorge, is expressing his OPINION that the conviction should have been dismissed. Lorge does NOT provide any evidence that the perpetrator was wrongly convicted or that the accusation was bogus. He only asserts that the White House wanted action on sexual assaults in the military.

                  So, in summary, this is some guy's opinion.
                  A bit more than his opinion. the conviction was overturned and they are barred from ever trying him again.

                  From the OPs first link....

                  "The split 3-2 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces tosses out the highly decorated commando’s 2014 court-martial conviction and bars the armed forces from ever trying him again.

                  The legal victory of Senior Chief Special Warfare Operator Keith E. Barry — who never quit proclaiming his innocence — will ripple across the entire military."

                  Reading is fundamental.

                  Last edited by NOS68; 10-13-2018, 02:46 PM.

                  Comment


                  • #11
                    Originally posted by nedezero1 View Post

                    Ummmm... they sampled 1800 people. So it's not "more Anericans".

                    Hardly a definitive statement of her credibility.

                    There is however years of judge Kavanaugh's record which does speak to his credibility.
                    (Someone doesn’t know how surveys are done)
                    Originally posted by Hoot Owl;n32354094
                    If there were things available to make Trump look good don't you think he would have released them by now?
                    To you I'm an atheist; but to God, I'm the Loyal Opposition.

                    Comment


                    • Tom Hicks
                      Tom Hicks commented
                      Editing a comment
                      Statistical sampling involves the arcane wizardry and conjuring of mathematics. Thus foreign to many.

                  • #12
                    Originally posted by BadDaddy View Post
                    How exactly did the Democrats target Kavanaugh,

                    https://www.opensecrets.org/news/201...iberal-groups/

                    Read up on Brian Fallon and how he is using dark money from the Sixteen Thirty Fund to attack conservative judicial candidates. Do a quick websearch on the group known as "Demand Justice".
                    "The historical experience of socialist countries has sadly demonstrated that collectivism does not do away with alienation but rather increases it, adding to it a lack of basic necessities and economic inefficiency." ------------------ Pope John Paul II

                    Comment


                    • #13
                      Originally posted by NOS68 View Post

                      A bit more than his opinion. the conviction was overturned and they are barred from ever trying him again.

                      From the OPs first link....

                      "The split 3-2 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces tosses out the highly decorated commando’s 2014 court-martial conviction and bars the armed forces from ever trying him again.

                      The legal victory of Senior Chief Special Warfare Operator Keith E. Barry — who never quit proclaiming his innocence — will ripple across the entire military."

                      Reading is fundamental.
                      The case was overturned because of judicial interference, not because the accusations were bogus.

                      Comment


                      • #14
                        Originally posted by SteinbergerHack View Post


                        https://www.opensecrets.org/news/201...iberal-groups/

                        Read up on Brian Fallon and how he is using dark money from the Sixteen Thirty Fund to attack conservative judicial candidates. Do a quick websearch on the group known as "Demand Justice".
                        Look up Judicial Crisis Network while you're at it.

                        Comment


                        • #15
                          Originally posted by RogueGnome View Post

                          (Someone doesn’t know how surveys are done)
                          Lolz...

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X