Members rasputin1963 Posted June 23, 2013 Members Share Posted June 23, 2013 Can we talk about your lead vocal in a recording? What are your usual instincts and workflow when you have a freshly-recorded, "naked" lead vocal? Do you have a preferred style in how you like your lead vocals to sound? In particular, I am interested in how much low frequencies you like to remain in your final leadvox track. From listening to older, pre-digital pop hits, I notice that many famous singers were identifiable by their highest frequencies, and that the producer had no need for their throatier deeper timbres. So a high-pass filter was surely used just to allow passage of the crispiest trebles, consonants, breaths/transients--- and the singer's unique "stamp" was conveyed that way. Rarely, it seems to me, did a traditional pop record need to bring in the warmth and intimacy of lower frequencies as the microphone surely "heard" it. Your comments, please? ras Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members blue2blue Posted June 23, 2013 Members Share Posted June 23, 2013 The less 'intimate' the mix, the more I have a tendency to roll off the bottom on the vocal.I will often tend to roll off bottom on most miked instruments, not so much to thin out their own sound as to eliminate low frequency noise sneaking in from my physical environment. I have zero isolation here (bit windows and plenty and the houses in my beach neighborhood are like stacked shoeboxes [i have a tiny flat over some garages, don't hate me for living at the beach, I'm as broke as the next guy]) -- but even in my old house's project studio, which was pretty isolated, very low frequencies would get in. (Typically from Harleys or dudes blasting their 2KW bump truck stereos, but there was a bus stop about 50 yards from my house on the other side of the block.) Thinning out below the program material in live-miked tracks helps keep the mix clean. And, of course, I also will thin out guitars or other instruments to make them fit in a mix better, too. I also take off top end to keep instruments from interfering with each other, vocals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Mark L Posted June 23, 2013 Members Share Posted June 23, 2013 Well, I press 'record' and then sing into the mic You're welcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Rudolf von Hagenwil Posted June 24, 2013 Members Share Posted June 24, 2013 rasputin1963 wrote: What are your usual instincts and workflow when you have a freshly-recorded, "naked" lead vocal? It's a sculpturing job. Each piece of music is different and the mixing workflow varies. Lead vocals are usually cut below 120 Hz with a HP filter so about 6-12 dB step. Depending in the microphone used eventually a little boosted around 2000 Hz and 5000 Hz, only a tiny bit... when a vocal track needs to be doctored too much then there went something wrong in the recording.It's a sculpturing job and balancing the tracks until the music makes sense in a final mix. Film and TV scoring also requires a RMS maximum standard which is rather low in level compared to pop/rock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Ernest Buckley Posted June 25, 2013 Members Share Posted June 25, 2013 Hey Ras,For me, lead vocal treatment is determined on the instrumentation of the rest of the track. For a sparse recording with just piano, I`ll give the lead vocal more weight with more reverb.A pretty consistent rule for me is: the busier the tune, the smaller each track gets.E Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.