The Political Party

[Booker]

And not a single rational argument from the right.

Pathetic Hypocrites.

[mauser]

I wonder they ever tried to create a nuclear warhead-tipped bullet.

[mauser]

[Just Me]

I dont see why they cant develop a hand held nuke grenade, or at teh very least some sort of "dirty grenade"

after all, the only thing stopping a bad guy with a dirty bomb, is a good guy with a dirty bomb.

[Telecruiser]

---

Booker wrote:

And not a single rational argument from the right.

Pathetic Hypocrites.

---

Not really. I figured ol' Caulk was just bored and decided to troll a bit. I know he's a lot smarter than this.

[Booker]

---

Telecruiser wrote:

---

Booker wrote:

And not a single rational argument from the right.

Pathetic Hypocrites.

---

Not really. I figured ol' Caulk was just bored and decided to troll a bit. I know he's a lot smarter than this.

---

So you agree then, that people should be allowed to own nuclear weapons with no regulations on them?

[Telecruiser]

---

Booker wrote:

---

Telecruiser wrote:

---

Booker wrote:

And not a single rational argument from the right.

Pathetic Hypocrites.

---

Not really. I figured ol' Caulk was just bored and decided to troll a bit. I know he's a lot smarter than this.

---

So you agree then, that people should be allowed to own nuclear weapons with no regulations on them?

---

Yes, every American citizen, including little babies, should be able to own and deploy nuclear weapons. Illegal aliens should have a ten day waiting period. They should be able to take them out plinking with their buddies on a Saturday afternoon too. You know, set up a couple of cities at the ten mile mark and then launch 'em. Great fun!

[sporter]

Law abiding citizens should be able to get military grade anthrax, too. Right now, only criminals can get it.

[Telecruiser]

---

sporter wrote:

Law abiding citizens should be able to get military grade anthrax, too. Right now, only criminals can get it.

---

Nerve gas also. I would love to have a couple of drums of that stuff around the house just in case.

[Booker]

---

Telecruiser wrote:

---

sporter wrote:

Law abiding citizens should be able to get military grade anthrax, too. Right now, only criminals can get it.

---

Nerve gas also. I would love to have a couple of drums of that stuff around the house just in case.

---

You joke, but this is a massive flaw in the gun nuts argument.

[Mossy Mossy Mo…]

---

Caulk Rocket wrote:

After all, the average person has several hundred million dollars sitting around to purchase a warhead, build a silo, and then install a launch system.

And I'm sure your local zoning commission would unanimously approve of it!

---

So no one in America could afford one?

I don't think you thought this one through. 

[Mossy Mossy Mo…]

---

mauser wrote:

---

ryan7585 wrote:
no one wants to ban guns

---

No one?

---

I do. And it will happen in my lifetime.

[Telecruiser]

---

Booker wrote:

---

Telecruiser wrote:

---

sporter wrote:

Law abiding citizens should be able to get military grade anthrax, too. Right now, only criminals can get it.

---

Nerve gas also. I would love to have a couple of drums of that stuff around the house just in case.

---

You joke, but this is a massive flaw in the gun nuts argument.

---

No, it's the flaw you possess of rational thought.

[mdwagner73]

---

TIMKEYS wrote:

---

ryan7585 wrote:
I think it should be legal as long as you're qualified to operate them and are mentally sound.

Though, I'm not a fan of laws in general.

---

whats funny is you hve obama wanting to ban guns , but he doesnt give a rats **bleep** about iran getting nukes.. he has the whole middle east being run by the terrorist muslim brotherhood.   Just one more obama failure to add to the list.   

---

What's really funny is idiots who blather on as if the United States has some kind of legal authority over other countries.

[gismo recording]

Nobody wants Iran to have nukes (other than the Iranians). The thing is it's not up to the US to decide who is allowed to own nukes and who isn't.

I don't want Davo spouting stupid s.hit in the forum either, but it's not my place to tell him he can't.

[Just Me]

---

Booker wrote:

---

Telecruiser wrote:

---

sporter wrote:

Law abiding citizens should be able to get military grade anthrax, too. Right now, only criminals can get it.

---

Nerve gas also. I would love to have a couple of drums of that stuff around the house just in case.

---

You joke, but this is a massive flaw in the gun nuts argument.

---

Its why they refuse to talk about it....

Thye will deflect, spin, lie, jokewhatever it takes....  but they will not talk about it.

[moonlightin]

---

ryan7585 wrote:

what the **bleep**. how do you quote

---

Hit reply within someone's post, then click the quote button that is up to the right beside spell check.

[moonlightin]

---

yumpy wrote:

---

Davo17 wrote:

---

ryan7585 wrote:

1. No one wants to ban guns (not entirely, anyway)

2. Iran should be allowed to have nukes.

3. If you want a nuke, you can have one. Make yellowcake in your garage like that one high school kid. Instructions on the internet.

4. If you want a machine gun, you can have one. Make one in your garage like the millions of other people who do that all the time. Instructions on the internet.

5. If your problem with the above is that the government doesn't approve of what you want to do, don't tell the government about it and don't go around shooting and nuking people. PROBLEM SOLVED!!!!

---

its interesting while advocating for the stripping of honest americans rights you also want our enemy, and the worlds largest state sponsor of terrorism to habe nukes.

interesting the stands libs make...alway to defend chilmos and murderers.

---

hell, davo, we have the moral high ground! 

makes a lot of sense in a firefight! 

---

Moral highground? There's NOTHING moral about repugs.

[mdwagner73]

---

Booker wrote:

---

Telecruiser wrote:

---

sporter wrote:

Law abiding citizens should be able to get military grade anthrax, too. Right now, only criminals can get it.

---

Nerve gas also. I would love to have a couple of drums of that stuff around the house just in case.

---

You joke, but this is a massive flaw in the gun nuts argument.

---

There is a distinct and pretty obvious distinction between firearms and the weapons to which you are attempting to compare them.  Nuclear weapons and biological/chemical weapons are indiscriminant.  They are unusuable from a personal self-defense standpoint because their lethality cannot be directed at a specific attacker and once deployed they cannot be contained. 

[Sloppy Santa]

---

Davo17 wrote:

---

Sloppy Santa wrote:

---

TIMKEYS wrote:

---

ryan7585 wrote:
I think it should be legal as long as you're qualified to operate them and are mentally sound.

Though, I'm not a fan of laws in general.

---

whats funny is you hve obama wanting to ban guns , but he doesnt give a rats **bleep** about iran getting nukes.. he has the whole middle east being run by the terrorist muslim brotherhood.   Just one more obama failure to add to the list.   

---

It is not proven that Iran wants nukes. Even if it did, the "issue" with that is first and foremost that it is in violation of the treaty they signed, the NPT. But that would really just be an issue of whether or not they could be trusted, so it's well worth comparing that to the numerous other nations violating treaties. Violating that treaty in particular doesn't really say much since Israel for example never signed it in the first place AND has nukes.

Secondly, since when is it the job of the United States to decide who rules the rest of the world? Talk about ego-centric **bleep**.

i wish there was a way to air drop you into iran. 

---

---

Don't misquote me you little shit.