Reply
Valued Contributor
Tom Hicks
Posts: 49,826
Registered: ‎12-07-2001

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed

Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
savoldi
Posts: 18,343
Registered: ‎05-27-2004

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


Fred Fartboski wrote:

prolurkerguy wrote:

 .

Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one. :smileyhappy:


So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean. :smileyhappy:


That may be asking too much. I don't figure the rightwhacks on here for bathing very often.

"I don't see how the fat lady with the dog fits in." Stonedtone

"I usually know whats going to come out well. Im usually right." Davo17

"Don't make me spell bitch on your ass with a backwards B." moonlight

"He believes that when you've worked hard, and done well, and walked through that doorway of opportunity, you do not slam it shut behind you. You reach back, and you give other folks the same chances that helped you succeed."
Please use plain text.
Contributor
nedezero1
Posts: 58
Registered: ‎01-17-2013

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


larry50 wrote:

There is no denying that fact.

But, there are very few countries who possess missiles of the required accuracy and sophistication to bring down a fully defended carrier.  The days of Entendards flying Exocets undetected to within missile range of a US carrier are long gone. 


Pretty much my point. I just realized arguing with Tom Hicks on this subject is like arguing with a 5 year old on the merits of going to bed on time.

His "arguments" are reduced to cut/paste of subject matter he doesn't even understand.

 

 

Please use plain text.
Contributor
nedezero1
Posts: 58
Registered: ‎01-17-2013

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


larry50 wrote:

Tom Hicks wrote:

US Cole, more evidence of assymetrical warfare.

cole


I think we may have learned a few lessons from the Cole incident. 


 

Yep...just try to approach a U.S. warship these days. It'll end very wet and bloody.

 

Please use plain text.
Senior Member
prolurkerguy
Posts: 0
Registered: ‎01-31-2013

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed

"His "arguments" are reduced to cut/paste of subject matter he doesn't even understand."

I wondered if anyone else noticed his M.O.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
mauser
Posts: 13,984
Registered: ‎10-26-2007

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed

Ned: We may be quicker to kill anyone approaching US vessels....but we've apparently not yet figured out why they want to kill us to begin with.

Please use plain text.
Contributor
nedezero1
Posts: 58
Registered: ‎01-17-2013

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


mauser wrote:
Ned: We may be quicker to kill anyone approaching US vessels....but we've apparently not yet figured out why they want to kill us to begin with.


That's irrelevant in the context of a ship's physical security. That's for diplomats to figure out.

And when you're talking about a religion that considers it's duty to spread by the sword, who cares "why" they want to kill us.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
mauser
Posts: 13,984
Registered: ‎10-26-2007

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


nedezero1 wrote:

And when you're talking about a religion that considers it's duty to spread by the sword, who cares "why" they want to kill us.


I'd say that if we knew why, we might be able to prevent more of us from being killed and make unnecessary the need for us to go 'round the world killing them, and then have them kill more of us, etc....

Seems like an idea that those at the top might want to explore.

Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
savoldi
Posts: 18,343
Registered: ‎05-27-2004

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed

There's a real simple answer to why they want to kill us. WE KEEP FUCKING WITH THEM. How hard do you think it would be to prove that in court? What would the defense be? They just don't like us and that's the reason?The infidel thing that seems to be centered only on American infidels?
"I don't see how the fat lady with the dog fits in." Stonedtone

"I usually know whats going to come out well. Im usually right." Davo17

"Don't make me spell bitch on your ass with a backwards B." moonlight

"He believes that when you've worked hard, and done well, and walked through that doorway of opportunity, you do not slam it shut behind you. You reach back, and you give other folks the same chances that helped you succeed."
Please use plain text.
Senior Member
prolurkerguy
Posts: 0
Registered: ‎01-31-2013

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


Fred Fartboski wrote:

prolurkerguy wrote:

 .

Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one. :smileyhappy:


So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean. :smileyhappy:


Your question makes no sense.

Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
savoldi
Posts: 18,343
Registered: ‎05-27-2004

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


prolurkerguy wrote:

Fred Fartboski wrote:

prolurkerguy wrote:

 .

Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one. :smileyhappy:


So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean. :smileyhappy:


Your question makes no sense.


Well. Now we know you don't wash, at least.

"I don't see how the fat lady with the dog fits in." Stonedtone

"I usually know whats going to come out well. Im usually right." Davo17

"Don't make me spell bitch on your ass with a backwards B." moonlight

"He believes that when you've worked hard, and done well, and walked through that doorway of opportunity, you do not slam it shut behind you. You reach back, and you give other folks the same chances that helped you succeed."
Please use plain text.
Senior Member
prolurkerguy
Posts: 0
Registered: ‎01-31-2013

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed


savoldi wrote:

prolurkerguy wrote:

Fred Fartboski wrote:

prolurkerguy wrote:

 .

Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one. :smileyhappy:


So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean. :smileyhappy:


Your question makes no sense.


Well. Now we know you don't wash, at least.


What? You're a strange guy.

Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Tom Hicks
Posts: 49,826
Registered: ‎12-07-2001

Re: Navy: USS Lincoln refueling delayed

ike warned us.

 

 Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea.

Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.

This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. 

 

Please use plain text.