02-11-2013 05:44 PM
02-11-2013 05:46 PM
Fred Fartboski wrote:
prolurkerguy wrote:
.Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one.
So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean.
That may be asking too much. I don't figure the rightwhacks on here for bathing very often.
02-11-2013 05:50 PM
larry50 wrote:There is no denying that fact.
But, there are very few countries who possess missiles of the required accuracy and sophistication to bring down a fully defended carrier. The days of Entendards flying Exocets undetected to within missile range of a US carrier are long gone.
Pretty much my point. I just realized arguing with Tom Hicks on this subject is like arguing with a 5 year old on the merits of going to bed on time.
His "arguments" are reduced to cut/paste of subject matter he doesn't even understand.
02-11-2013 05:51 PM
larry50 wrote:
Tom Hicks wrote:US Cole, more evidence of assymetrical warfare.
I think we may have learned a few lessons from the Cole incident.
Yep...just try to approach a U.S. warship these days. It'll end very wet and bloody.
02-11-2013 05:51 PM
02-11-2013 06:29 PM
02-11-2013 06:35 PM
mauser wrote:
Ned: We may be quicker to kill anyone approaching US vessels....but we've apparently not yet figured out why they want to kill us to begin with.
That's irrelevant in the context of a ship's physical security. That's for diplomats to figure out.
And when you're talking about a religion that considers it's duty to spread by the sword, who cares "why" they want to kill us.
02-12-2013 02:09 AM
nedezero1 wrote:And when you're talking about a religion that considers it's duty to spread by the sword, who cares "why" they want to kill us.
I'd say that if we knew why, we might be able to prevent more of us from being killed and make unnecessary the need for us to go 'round the world killing them, and then have them kill more of us, etc....
Seems like an idea that those at the top might want to explore.
02-12-2013 08:42 AM
02-12-2013 09:51 AM
Fred Fartboski wrote:
prolurkerguy wrote:
.Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one.
So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean.
Your question makes no sense.
02-12-2013 09:54 AM
prolurkerguy wrote:
Fred Fartboski wrote:
prolurkerguy wrote:
.Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one.
So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean.
Your question makes no sense.
Well. Now we know you don't wash, at least.
02-12-2013 09:55 AM
savoldi wrote:
prolurkerguy wrote:
Fred Fartboski wrote:
prolurkerguy wrote:
.Tom so rarely gets to be correct, I say we give him this one.
So who's alt are you? Time to step foward and come clean.
Your question makes no sense.
Well. Now we know you don't wash, at least.
What? You're a strange guy.
02-12-2013 10:08 AM
ike warned us.
Our military organization today bears little relation to that known by any of my predecessors in peacetime, or indeed by the fighting men of World War II or Korea. Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations. This conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual -- is felt in every city, every State house, every office of the Federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society. In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
About HCHarmonyCentral.com is the leading Internet resource for musicians, supplying valuable information from news and product reviews, to classified ads and chat rooms.
Advertise on HC