Reply
Super Contributor
flagbasher
Posts: 284
Registered: ‎07-30-2012

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


burningsg wrote:

OWS is exposed: Rich, white, educated and working

 

 

  • By BETH DEFALCO
  • Last Updated: 1:01 AM, January 29, 2013
  • Posted: 12:45 AM, January 29, 2013

It seems those Occupy Wall Streeters were a lot closer to the 1 percent than they would like to admit.

A new study of the OWS movement in New York found that many of the protesters were highly educated and not nearly as down on their luck as they portrayed.

A third of protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York lived in households earning more than $100,000 and more than two- thirds were employed professionals, according to the study from CUNY’s Joseph A. Murphy Institute for Worker Education and Labor Studies.

The study also showed the movement was mostly organized by experienced political operatives and nearly all of those involved — 76 percent — were college educated.

 

Of those, half had graduate degrees and among those with bachelor’s degrees, and 28 percent had attended elite universities.

“Occupy Wall Street was not a spontaneous eruption but rather an action carefully planned by committed activists,” the study concluded.

Additionally, the study found that the protesters were also disproportionately men — 55 percent — and many were white.

“It’s a pretty affluent demographic and highly educated,” said Professor Ruth Milkman, one of the study’s authors. “Many were the children of the elite, if you will.”

While they weren’t all homeless, many of the under-30 crowd who participated in the movement were recently laid off or underemployed, with nearly a quarter saying they work fewer than 35 hours a week.

“Most OWS activists and supporters were deeply skeptical of the mainstream political system as an effective vehicle for social change,” the study found.

About 750 protesters were surveyed for the study, which took about six months.

 

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/ows_is_exposed_YNtIaMcv6cToWt448kLQYO


Whiner.


39.6% Bracket Taxpayers for Obama


http://www.harmonycentral.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/6798i935609AB8ABDD0F8/image-size/original?v=mpbl-1&px=-1


Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Tom Hicks
Posts: 49,826
Registered: ‎12-07-2001

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

after dissing them as a group of educated citizens, i half-expected the murdoch rag to diss the supporters of more economic fairness for more of us as inclined towards that bastion of all evil - science.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Graeca
Posts: 268
Registered: ‎01-18-2013

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


Used2BMarkoh wrote:

Invisible Hand wrote:

They didn't portray themselves as poor.  They were trying to raise awareness of the fact that our system is tilted in favor of the very wealthy.  Fail.  Again.


Nah, they had no idea what they were trying to say, nor does anybody else.  Just a bunch of people taking themselves way too seriously.

 



Excellent description of the Tea Bagger branch of the GOP.

Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Gromit
Posts: 25,078
Registered: ‎08-26-2002

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


burningsg wrote:

OWS is exposed: Rich, white, educated and working

 

 

  • By BETH DEFALCO
  • Last Updated: 1:01 AM, January 29, 2013
  • Posted: 12:45 AM, January 29, 2013

It seems those Occupy Wall Streeters were a lot closer to the 1 percent than they would like to admit.

A new study of the OWS movement in New York found that many of the protesters were highly educated and not nearly as down on their luck as they portrayed.



Erm, aren't you forgetting something?

 

It was the vicious, brainless rightwongers who characterized OWS as jobless, feckless and unwashed.  This story is just rightwing spin on their own lie which has been disproved.

Trolls:
They cannot live without trolling.
Normal people, on the other hand, can choose when to respond and when to ignore.

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right, here I am - stuck in the middle with you


Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Gromit
Posts: 25,078
Registered: ‎08-26-2002

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


Jack Walker wrote:
LOL @ the OWSers who have all the tools to be successful in life but are too lazy to use them.

Lol at Jack who can't actually read what the article says.

 

 

Trolls:
They cannot live without trolling.
Normal people, on the other hand, can choose when to respond and when to ignore.

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right, here I am - stuck in the middle with you


Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Gromit
Posts: 25,078
Registered: ‎08-26-2002

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


Kramerguy wrote:

Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),


'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.

Trolls:
They cannot live without trolling.
Normal people, on the other hand, can choose when to respond and when to ignore.

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right, here I am - stuck in the middle with you


Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 13,049
Registered: ‎06-02-2009

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


LithiumZero wrote:

Markoh's description sounds just like the Tea Party Terrorists


Taxed Enough Already.  Pretty succint, pretty to the point.  They did not "occupy" anything, did not crap on cop cars, etc.

Now, a lot of teaparty folk haven't said what government bennie they're willing to give up in order to reduce taxes, that is certainly a fair charge to make.  But to say that teaparty grannies are anything like spoiled rich kids is just silly.

 

I have noticed that those who deny God also deny their own humanity
Please use plain text.
Contributor
Mossy Mossy Moss
Posts: 60
Registered: ‎01-17-2013

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


Used2BMarkoh wrote:

LithiumZero wrote:

Markoh's description sounds just like the Tea Party Terrorists


Taxed Enough Already.  Pretty succint, pretty to the point.  They did not "occupy" anything, did not crap on cop cars, etc.

Now, a lot of teaparty folk haven't said what government bennie they're willing to give up in order to reduce taxes, that is certainly a fair charge to make.  But to say that teaparty grannies are anything like spoiled rich kids is just silly.

 


 

21

I HAVE SPOKEN
Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
LithiumZero
Posts: 5,059
Registered: ‎11-27-2004

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

The tea party has long forgotten about being over taxed and has concerned itself with social issues and ridding the white house of the black man

"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."



“Conservatives say if you don't give the rich more money, they will lose their incentive to invest. As for the poor, they tell us they've lost all incentive because we've given them too much money.”

― George Carlin


"The founding fathers were well aware of rapid firing capabilities by the indians." - NormH
Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Zig al-din
Posts: 15,489
Registered: ‎07-07-2009

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

Even if true, so what? Anyone who can't see that there's enormous wealth disparities in this country and that it's a threat to democratic principles is just ignorant and/or brainwashed. 

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Kramerguy
Posts: 10,198
Registered: ‎07-07-2004

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


Gromit wrote:

Kramerguy wrote:

Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),


'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.


I don't know what the details are.. I thought I made that pretty clear.  No reason to be a d1ck about it, but whatever.

If you follow the logical conclusion, that the article fails to mention what kind of $$ the employed members of OWS actually made, yet they intentionally made the inclusion that they "came from" $100k+ households.. So there's only two possibilities-  You can only conclude that they either make $100k+ (which is details missing) or that they still live with their parents (which is details also missing).  I made the leap of faith that more likely, they are living with the parents, which I believed was obviously a guess (as it was the whole point of my post...), pointing out that .. ahem.. details are missing. 

If you want to argue that the other possibility is more probable, then lay out an argument rather than make stupid accusations.

 

The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, “You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I’m just not close enough to get the job done.” - George Carlin RIP
Please use plain text.
Contributor
Mossy Mossy Moss
Posts: 60
Registered: ‎01-17-2013

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

Top 1% income: $370,000 and above

I HAVE SPOKEN
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 982
Registered: ‎12-21-2011

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

NY Post.  Lol.  What a rag. 

 

Glad to see OWS making RW troll BurningSTD itch and burn extra hard.

Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Gromit
Posts: 25,078
Registered: ‎08-26-2002

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

[ Edited ]

Kramerguy wrote:

Gromit wrote:

Kramerguy wrote:

Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),


'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.


I don't know what the details are.. I thought I made that pretty clear.  No reason to be a d1ck about it, but whatever.


Kramerguy, you're the one being a dick, expecting us all to accept your word for it that .'$100k household' means 'living with parents'.

 

It's a little bit sad that you had to get so pissy when called on your dishonesty, but no doubt you'll get the fuck over it someday soon.

 

Trolls:
They cannot live without trolling.
Normal people, on the other hand, can choose when to respond and when to ignore.

Clowns to the left of me, Jokers to the right, here I am - stuck in the middle with you


Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Kramerguy
Posts: 10,198
Registered: ‎07-07-2004

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

[ Edited ]

Gromit wrote:

Kramerguy wrote:

Gromit wrote:

Kramerguy wrote:

Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),


'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.


I don't know what the details are.. I thought I made that pretty clear.  No reason to be a d1ck about it, but whatever.


Kramerguy, you're the one being a dick, expecting us all to accept your word for it that .'$100k household' means 'living with parents'.

 

It's a little bit sad that you had to get so pissy when called on your dishonesty, but no doubt you'll get the fuck over it someday soon.

 


dishonesty?  You left out the part where I explained that it should have been obvious that I was guessing because of the obvious missing information, you again accuse me of something that just isn't true outside of your own little world.  If anything, I openly admitted it was an assumption based on the only two possible reasons, both of which satisfied the point I was making.

Yes, your response was d1ckish, and you know it, stop trying to play the dumb innocent role, you aren't that dumb.  But that even after I spelled it out for you, that you still make the accusation proves to me that you are at least somewhat dumb, as I'm sure most here understood what I wrote- if not the first time around, then surely in my response to you.  You seem to be the only one who doesn't get it.

And I've noted that you apparently have nothing to add to the actual point I was making, other than trying to call me out on what might be the dumbest reason on the PPP this week.  Maybe you are that dumb?

The very existence of flamethrowers proves that sometime, somewhere, someone said to themselves, “You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I’m just not close enough to get the job done.” - George Carlin RIP
Please use plain text.
Senior Member
Big_Conig
Posts: 0
Registered: ‎01-22-2013

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

Will there ever be a righty thread that isn't a total fail?

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Zooey
Posts: 15,905
Registered: ‎01-10-2002

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


burningsg wrote:

OWS is exposed: Rich, white, educated and working


Meanwhile in the trailer park, the Tea Party is collecting welfare. 

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Zooey
Posts: 15,905
Registered: ‎01-10-2002

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


Used2BMarkoh wrote:Taxed Enough Already.  Pretty succint, pretty to the point.  They did not "occupy" anything, did not crap on cop cars, etc.

"Taxed Enough Already" was pretty hilarious coming from the group that largely falls within the 47% of the population that does not pay federal income tax.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 22,118
Registered: ‎05-18-2006

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS

Is the OP complaining about OWS people being productive members of society?
Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
Posts: 27,244
Registered: ‎10-06-2009

Re: Jug's Fleabaggers Exposed As Rich White 1% LOSERS


BA.Barcolounger wrote:
Is the OP complaining about OWS people being productive members of society?

I think the idiot is pushing that agenda.

An eye for an eye will make us all blind - Mohandas Ghandi

Dignity has nothing to do with us - Sid to Diego (Ice Age)

Consider it done - Bubble (Ab Fab)

Oh, they would. Oh you never know how many people like you till you're dead! - Curly (Oklahoma!)
Please use plain text.