01-30-2013 08:19 AM
burningsg wrote:OWS is exposed: Rich, white, educated and working
- By BETH DEFALCO
- Last Updated: 1:01 AM, January 29, 2013
- Posted: 12:45 AM, January 29, 2013
It seems those Occupy Wall Streeters were a lot closer to the 1 percent than they would like to admit.
A new study of the OWS movement in New York found that many of the protesters were highly educated and not nearly as down on their luck as they portrayed.
A third of protesters in the Occupy Wall Street movement in New York lived in households earning more than $100,000 and more than two- thirds were employed professionals, according to the study from CUNY’s Joseph A. Murphy Institute for Worker Education and Labor Studies.
The study also showed the movement was mostly organized by experienced political operatives and nearly all of those involved — 76 percent — were college educated.
Of those, half had graduate degrees and among those with bachelor’s degrees, and 28 percent had attended elite universities.
“Occupy Wall Street was not a spontaneous eruption but rather an action carefully planned by committed activists,” the study concluded.
Additionally, the study found that the protesters were also disproportionately men — 55 percent — and many were white.
“It’s a pretty affluent demographic and highly educated,” said Professor Ruth Milkman, one of the study’s authors. “Many were the children of the elite, if you will.”
While they weren’t all homeless, many of the under-30 crowd who participated in the movement were recently laid off or underemployed, with nearly a quarter saying they work fewer than 35 hours a week.
“Most OWS activists and supporters were deeply skeptical of the mainstream political system as an effective vehicle for social change,” the study found.
About 750 protesters were surveyed for the study, which took about six months.
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/ows_is_exposed_
YNtIaMcv6cToWt448kLQYO
Whiner.
39.6% Bracket Taxpayers for Obama
01-30-2013 08:38 AM
after dissing them as a group of educated citizens, i half-expected the murdoch rag to diss the supporters of more economic fairness for more of us as inclined towards that bastion of all evil - science.
01-30-2013 08:55 AM
Used2BMarkoh wrote:
Invisible Hand wrote:They didn't portray themselves as poor. They were trying to raise awareness of the fact that our system is tilted in favor of the very wealthy. Fail. Again.
Nah, they had no idea what they were trying to say, nor does anybody else. Just a bunch of people taking themselves way too seriously.
Excellent description of the Tea Bagger branch of the GOP.
01-30-2013 09:08 AM
burningsg wrote:OWS is exposed: Rich, white, educated and working
- By BETH DEFALCO
- Last Updated: 1:01 AM, January 29, 2013
- Posted: 12:45 AM, January 29, 2013
It seems those Occupy Wall Streeters were a lot closer to the 1 percent than they would like to admit.
A new study of the OWS movement in New York found that many of the protesters were highly educated and not nearly as down on their luck as they portrayed.
Erm, aren't you forgetting something?
It was the vicious, brainless rightwongers who characterized OWS as jobless, feckless and unwashed. This story is just rightwing spin on their own lie which has been disproved.
01-30-2013 09:10 AM
Jack Walker wrote:
LOL @ the OWSers who have all the tools to be successful in life but are too lazy to use them.
Lol at Jack who can't actually read what the article says.
01-30-2013 09:11 AM
Kramerguy wrote:Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),
'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.
01-30-2013 09:18 AM
LithiumZero wrote:Markoh's description sounds just like the Tea Party Terrorists
Taxed Enough Already. Pretty succint, pretty to the point. They did not "occupy" anything, did not crap on cop cars, etc.
Now, a lot of teaparty folk haven't said what government bennie they're willing to give up in order to reduce taxes, that is certainly a fair charge to make. But to say that teaparty grannies are anything like spoiled rich kids is just silly.
01-30-2013 09:25 AM
Used2BMarkoh wrote:
LithiumZero wrote:Markoh's description sounds just like the Tea Party Terrorists
Taxed Enough Already. Pretty succint, pretty to the point. They did not "occupy" anything, did not crap on cop cars, etc.
Now, a lot of teaparty folk haven't said what government bennie they're willing to give up in order to reduce taxes, that is certainly a fair charge to make. But to say that teaparty grannies are anything like spoiled rich kids is just silly.
01-30-2013 09:27 AM
The tea party has long forgotten about being over taxed and has concerned itself with social issues and ridding the white house of the black man
01-30-2013 09:35 AM
Even if true, so what? Anyone who can't see that there's enormous wealth disparities in this country and that it's a threat to democratic principles is just ignorant and/or brainwashed.
01-30-2013 10:01 AM
Gromit wrote:
Kramerguy wrote:Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),
'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.
I don't know what the details are.. I thought I made that pretty clear. No reason to be a d1ck about it, but whatever.
If you follow the logical conclusion, that the article fails to mention what kind of $$ the employed members of OWS actually made, yet they intentionally made the inclusion that they "came from" $100k+ households.. So there's only two possibilities- You can only conclude that they either make $100k+ (which is details missing) or that they still live with their parents (which is details also missing). I made the leap of faith that more likely, they are living with the parents, which I believed was obviously a guess (as it was the whole point of my post...), pointing out that .. ahem.. details are missing.
If you want to argue that the other possibility is more probable, then lay out an argument rather than make stupid accusations.
01-30-2013 10:09 AM
Top 1% income: $370,000 and above
01-30-2013 10:16 AM
NY Post. Lol. What a rag.
Glad to see OWS making RW troll BurningSTD itch and burn extra hard.
01-30-2013 10:19 AM - edited 01-30-2013 10:20 AM
Kramerguy wrote:
Gromit wrote:
Kramerguy wrote:Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),
'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.
I don't know what the details are.. I thought I made that pretty clear. No reason to be a d1ck about it, but whatever.
Kramerguy, you're the one being a dick, expecting us all to accept your word for it that .'$100k household' means 'living with parents'.
It's a little bit sad that you had to get so pissy when called on your dishonesty, but no doubt you'll get the fuck over it someday soon.
01-30-2013 11:43 AM - edited 01-30-2013 11:44 AM
Gromit wrote:
Kramerguy wrote:
Gromit wrote:
Kramerguy wrote:Read between the lines of that story and notice that some of the OWS'ers are from $100k households.. meaning they live with mom and dad (details left out of the article),
'Details left out of the article' is not the same as 'details that Kramerguy can just pull out of his arse'.
I don't know what the details are.. I thought I made that pretty clear. No reason to be a d1ck about it, but whatever.
Kramerguy, you're the one being a dick, expecting us all to accept your word for it that .'$100k household' means 'living with parents'.
It's a little bit sad that you had to get so pissy when called on your dishonesty, but no doubt you'll get the fuck over it someday soon.
dishonesty? You left out the part where I explained that it should have been obvious that I was guessing because of the obvious missing information, you again accuse me of something that just isn't true outside of your own little world. If anything, I openly admitted it was an assumption based on the only two possible reasons, both of which satisfied the point I was making.
Yes, your response was d1ckish, and you know it, stop trying to play the dumb innocent role, you aren't that dumb. But that even after I spelled it out for you, that you still make the accusation proves to me that you are at least somewhat dumb, as I'm sure most here understood what I wrote- if not the first time around, then surely in my response to you. You seem to be the only one who doesn't get it.
And I've noted that you apparently have nothing to add to the actual point I was making, other than trying to call me out on what might be the dumbest reason on the PPP this week. Maybe you are that dumb?
01-30-2013 11:44 AM
Will there ever be a righty thread that isn't a total fail?
01-30-2013 01:22 PM
burningsg wrote:OWS is exposed: Rich, white, educated and working
Meanwhile in the trailer park, the Tea Party is collecting welfare.
01-30-2013 01:43 PM
Used2BMarkoh wrote:Taxed Enough Already. Pretty succint, pretty to the point. They did not "occupy" anything, did not crap on cop cars, etc.
"Taxed Enough Already" was pretty hilarious coming from the group that largely falls within the 47% of the population that does not pay federal income tax.
01-30-2013 01:54 PM
01-30-2013 01:56 PM
BA.Barcolounger wrote:
Is the OP complaining about OWS people being productive members of society?
I think the idiot is pushing that agenda.
About HCHarmonyCentral.com is the leading Internet resource for musicians, supplying valuable information from news and product reviews, to classified ads and chat rooms.
Advertise on HC