Open Jam

[Bonneville93]

[COLOR="Red"][SIZE="4"]League is full, thanks...[/SIZE]


The draft is currently set for Tuesday September 7 at 8:30pm Eastern.

current roster spaces (dependent on number of managers)

2 QB
2 WR
2 RB
1 TE
2 WR/TE (essentially a 3rd and 4th WR spot)
1 WR/TE/RB (essentially a 3rd RB spot)
2 K
2 DEF
7 BENCH

we will have points per reception this year



Propose your ideas in this thread.

[SBF3000]

i play. i is good. won espn league last year. was a wr friendly league. i did not like it as much as more standard scoring.


4 RBS?>???????????????:freak:

[Bonneville93]

i play. i is good. won espn league last year. was a wr friendly league. i did not like it as much as more standard scoring.


4 RBS?>???????????????:freak:

2 RBs

I sent you a PM.

[DirtyOldRug]

Can we please have points per catch?

[SBF3000]

Can we please have points per catch?

gayest point given ever.

wes welker is better than a top 3 qb....oke::rolleyes:

[Bonneville93]

Can we please have points per catch?

as long as there isn't a huge opposition, I expect to include point per reception this year, I just have to figure out how much to roll back receiving yards to make it balanced, but we will try it this year

I'm probably going to get rid of most of the 'bonus' points this year.

If we end up with 8 instead of 10 managers, I might expand rosters too.

[Bonneville93]

gayest point given ever.

wes welker is better than a top 3 qb....oke::rolleyes:

you don't have to give a full point per catch, it can be 0.5 PPR ... plus the receiving yards will be rolled back... we won't let WRs dominate

[SBF3000]

you don't have to give a full point per catch, it can be 0.5 PPR ... plus the receiving yards will be rolled back... we won't let WRs dominate

:thu:



As long as there is balance, I wouldn't mind.

[Stonedtone]

Dude, I always respected your play in this. yo go man. Thanks for the PMs about it to. I'll play this year.

[DirtyOldRug]

gayest point given ever.

wes welker is better than a top 3 qb....oke::rolleyes:

WR's should be given credit for catches, there's nothing more bush league than playing a fantasy football league with no PPR. It's for the birds :rolleyes:

I'm OK with .5 PPR, but I don't believe in rolling back the yards.

Especially in this format with a WR/TE, instead of a WR/RB position like every other normal league on the planet.

[Bonneville93]

Dude, I always respected your play in this. yo go man. Thanks for the PMs about it to. I'll play this year.

you never replied to the PM?

[SBF3000]

WR's should be given credit for catches, there's nothing more bush league than playing a fantasy football league with no PPR. It's for the birds :rolleyes:

I'm OK with .5 PPR, but I don't believe in rolling back the yards.

Especially in this format with a WR/TE, instead of a WR/RB position like every other normal league on the planet.

I have a problem with wrs having a 9 rec 120 2 td game (28.5-33pts) scoring more than a qb that threw 300 3tds o ints (24-30pts)

or welker 10 for 90 scoring 19.....oke:

[Stonedtone]

you never replied to the PM?

I always felt inferior to the facepunchers and shais. I didn't want to join. lets go

[skippydmongoose]

where's the over/under thread?

[DirtyOldRug]

I have a problem with wrs having a 9 rec 120 2 td game (28.5-33pts) scoring more than a qb that threw 300 3tds o ints (24-30pts)

or welker 10 for 90 scoring 19.....oke:

Considering that it's much more rare to see a WR put up 9 rec 120 with 2 TDs than it is to see the 300 yard passing game, I disagree.

That's the NFL, 300 yard passers are becoming much more common, and the WR (or the lax rules helping WRs) deserves more of the fantasy credit.

I don't have a problem with a half of a point per reception, but rolling back receiving yards is stupid.

[DirtyOldRug]

PPR also goes to TE's and RB's too, which is the part I like.

I think it's pretty ridiculous that a TE gets undervalued when they make 7 catches for 50 yards. In a standard, retarded format that TE gets 5 points, but his impact on the actual game is far greater than that.

[SBF3000]

PPR also goes to TE's and RB's too, which is the part I like.

I think it's pretty ridiculous that a TE gets undervalued when they make 7 catches for 50 yards. In a standard, retarded format that TE gets 5 points, but his impact on the actual game is far greater than that.

so a TE should get 8.5-12 points for that?

what about a RB that catches 4 balls for 10 yards? that equals a 5pts? same impact on the game as a 50 yard run?

I don't disagree entirely, I think there should be a reward for being a productive player. There is a lot of grey in there that makes me uneasy.

I admit I benefited last year when Brandon Marshall went on his insane reception spree, but when I can pick up a 3rd down back that catches 6 balls for 30 and a score that beats out Adrian who had 25 carries and 140 yards that doesn't seem right to me. Does it to you?

[DirtyOldRug]

so a TE should get 8.5-12 points for that?

what about a RB that catches 4 balls for 10 yards? that equals a 5pts? same impact on the game as a 50 yard run?

I don't disagree entirely, I think there should be a reward for being a productive player. There is a lot of grey in there that makes me uneasy.

I admit I benefited last year when Brandon Marshall went on his insane reception spree, but when I can pick up a 3rd down back that catches 6 balls for 30 and a score that beats out Adrian who had 25 carries and 140 yards that doesn't seem right to me. Does it to you?

Adrian probably had a lost fumble or three, and didn't score a touchdown.

That's the breaks!

[SBF3000]

Adrian probably had a lost fumble or three, and didn't score a touchdown.

That's the breaks!

dum:arg:

[bleepedybloops]

im in draft time sounds like it will work for me as well:thu: