01-29-2013 02:59 PM - edited 01-29-2013 03:09 PM
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-29-2013 03:13 PM
Hopefully, the issues with the amplifier modules used in Carvin active cabs have been worked out....
01-29-2013 03:44 PM
01-29-2013 04:51 PM
I just remember reading about amp module failures in Carvin cabinets more than once and that it was a known issue. I imagine the current ones are OK, but you never know with carvin.
Al
01-29-2013 05:09 PM
No experience with Carvin but if their backing it up with a 3 year warranty that sounds way better then all the other budget line warranty offerings. Sounds like Carvin is confident in their product but might research how well their warranty service is.



01-29-2013 07:06 PM - edited 01-29-2013 07:32 PM
In Carvin's spec sheet it says the amplifier is "full range 400watts", (probably a 200watt rms module). It does not say if it is bi-amplified which is a feature I would want in a powered speaker.
01-29-2013 08:07 PM
The other big issue (for me) with carvin is If yo do have issues with a piece of gear, only THEY can work on it and you basically have to ship it back if you have any problem. With a Peavey or Yorkville products however, many music stores can often fix the problem in house very quickly with no cost to you. That is a big plus for me anyway...
Al
01-29-2013 08:50 PM - edited 01-30-2013 04:56 AM
I've heard the PM series Carvin stuff on 3 occasions (3 different bands). All were full on cover bands and had no subs. Short story.... ugh!!! They were in over their heads. Were the users trying to get bass out of them.... On 2 occasions yes, I think so. On one no. Still they were pretty gross.
IMO, the cheapest thing of quality is the RCF 300 series stuff. Yes, it's considerably more than the the Alto and Carvin stuff, but it's where serious sound reinforcement starts. Less than that is amateur hour house party playtime stuff. Sound comes out yes, but there's only so much you can do with it. People won't necessarily blame the speakers, but they may say the band isn't that good. In all 3 cases I could totally see that. I recognized the bands were all pretty darn good. They just sounded like poo.
01-30-2013 04:51 AM
abzurd wrote:IMO, the cheapest thing of quality is the RCF 300 series stuff.
OK I'm figuring out the quote sequence finaly.
I'd put JBL's newer EON series in that same catagory. They don't sound great but they don't suck, and they will last. Their cost is in the same ballpark as well.
01-30-2013 07:01 AM - edited 01-30-2013 07:55 AM
01-30-2013 09:45 AM
JRBLE wrote:
abzurd wrote:IMO, the cheapest thing of quality is the RCF 300 series stuff.
OK I'm figuring out the quote sequence finaly.
I'd put JBL's newer EON series in that same catagory. They don't sound great but they don't suck, and they will last. Their cost is in the same ballpark as well.
New JBL Eon's are selling for $200 more (street) than the Art310's and only get half as loud. The old ones were painfull to listen to, not sure about the new ones.
Some have said the RCF 310/312's sound better than the JBL PRX and QSC K series which are selling for twice as much.
The Alto's have the best rewiews of any of the bottom of the barrel powered boxes but the new EV ZLX should give them some competition when they hit the stores.
02-01-2013 04:35 PM
abzurd wrote:I've heard the PM series Carvin stuff on 3 occasions (3 different bands). All were full on cover bands and had no subs. Short story.... ugh!!! They were in over their heads. Were the users trying to get bass out of them.... On 2 occasions yes, I think so. On one no. Still they were pretty gross.
IMO, the cheapest thing of quality is the RCF 300 series stuff. Yes, it's considerably more than the the Alto and Carvin stuff, but it's where serious sound reinforcement starts. Less than that is amateur hour house party playtime stuff. Sound comes out yes, but there's only so much you can do with it. People won't necessarily blame the speakers, but they may say the band isn't that good. In all 3 cases I could totally see that. I recognized the bands were all pretty darn good. They just sounded like poo.
Bingo ![]()
As for the JBL EON's .... unless they have made galactic changes, the ones I have heard are awful.
The RCF312's can be had for ~$450.00 each and are a very nice sounding box.
Do you have, or intend to have subs to go with these tops?
02-03-2013 11:59 AM
OneEng wrote:Bingo
As for the JBL EON's .... unless they have made galactic changes, the ones I have heard are awful.
The RCF312's can be had for ~$450.00 each and are a very nice sounding box.
Do you have, or intend to have subs to go with these tops?
I was going to defend the EONs but I had to agree with you. They do sound like kaka. Unfortunatly the 4 that we have (that get used a min of 4 days per week) just won't die. I guess that's their only attribute. :-)
cheers
02-04-2013 12:56 PM
I'd have to say that Eons are proof that most people can't set up a sound system. I've heard a lot of awful-sounding bands, and somewhat fewer good ones, and they all had a mix of gear including Eons. Set up right, they sound good. I read a year ago that they also happen to be the biggest-selling speaker line in the US. That's a surprise. I would have guessed the Mackie's we see everywhere would have that title.
02-04-2013 02:29 PM
Craigv wrote:I'd have to say that Eons are proof that most people can't set up a sound system. I've heard a lot of awful-sounding bands, and somewhat fewer good ones, and they all had a mix of gear including Eons. Set up right, they sound good. I read a year ago that they also happen to be the biggest-selling speaker line in the US. That's a surprise. I would have guessed the Mackie's we see everywhere would have that title.
I would have thought it would have been peavey.
What I don't get, maybe it's just mean but I think the eons are not just ugly I think they are fugly. (cosmetically)
02-05-2013 11:05 AM
nchangin wrote:
Craigv wrote:
I'd have to say that Eons are proof that most people can't set up a sound system. I've heard a lot of awful-sounding bands, and somewhat fewer good ones, and they all had a mix of gear including Eons. Set up right, they sound good. I read a year ago that they also happen to be the biggest-selling speaker line in the US. That's a surprise. I would have guessed the Mackie's we see everywhere would have that title.
I would have thought it would have been peavey.
What I don't get, maybe it's just mean but I think the eons are not just ugly I think they are fugly. (cosmetically)
I probably see a Mackie SRM for every Peavey speaker from any of their various lines (Impulse, TLS, etc.) total.
I agree; the Eon is butt fugly from every angle.
02-05-2013 11:43 AM
Craigv wrote:I'd have to say that Eons are proof that most people can't set up a sound system. I've heard a lot of awful-sounding bands, and somewhat fewer good ones, and they all had a mix of gear including Eons. Set up right, they sound good. I read a year ago that they also happen to be the biggest-selling speaker line in the US. That's a surprise. I would have guessed the Mackie's we see everywhere would have that title.
Sorry about wandering OT.
Come on now. Of course acoustics, setup, talent and many other factors dictate the final outcome BUT having worked with EON's, Mackie, PRX & VRX all in the same venue (the last two don't count as they are in a different price range), the EON's are the worst sounding of the bunch by far. IMHO they are barely adequate (the key word is adequate which is why they haven't been replaced). Sure we have sucessful shows and everybody parties, dances and no one complains (except my own ears :-). FWIW these were bought when there were very few choices for powered speakers on the market (so keep in mind, these are the original design, not the updated version which I know little about). Considering their longevity, I guess it was a good buy but..........
02-05-2013 12:35 PM
JRBLE wrote:
Craigv wrote:
I'd have to say that Eons are proof that most people can't set up a sound system. I've heard a lot of awful-sounding bands, and somewhat fewer good ones, and they all had a mix of gear including Eons. Set up right, they sound good. I read a year ago that they also happen to be the biggest-selling speaker line in the US. That's a surprise. I would have guessed the Mackie's we see everywhere would have that title.
Sorry about wandering OT.
Come on now. Of course acoustics, setup, talent and many other factors dictate the final outcome BUT having worked with EON's, Mackie, PRX & VRX all in the same venue (the last two don't count as they are in a different price range), the EON's are the worst sounding of the bunch by far. IMHO they are barely adequate (the key word is adequate which is why they haven't been replaced). Sure we have sucessful shows and everybody parties, dances and no one complains (except my own ears :-). FWIW these were bought when there were very few choices for powered speakers on the market (so keep in mind, these are the original design, not the updated version which I know little about). Considering their longevity, I guess it was a good buy but..........
There's no comparison with PRX and VRX, but I've heard even old-ass Eon's sound as good as Mackie SRM400's.
02-05-2013 12:41 PM
I find the Eons to be exceptionally harsh. I do not like their sound at all for anything other than purely voice applications -where they do a good job of cutting through the crowd clutter.
02-05-2013 01:52 PM - edited 02-05-2013 01:54 PM
About HCHarmonyCentral.com is the leading Internet resource for musicians, supplying valuable information from news and product reviews, to classified ads and chat rooms.
Advertise on HC