11-27-2009 12:36 PM
I might have those... I used to have waveforms from most hybrid synths, extracted from ROM, like PPGs, ESQ, SQ80, Prophet VS and I maybe DW...
ooooooh, sweet. When I talked to Tom a while ago, it wasn't in there yet. Now the tricky part, where do we get the 16 DW-8000 waveforms? -Mc
11-27-2009 01:20 PM
Other example is the one I said previously, you load a system, modify various programs, but you only want to save one of them... if you save the system you´ll overwrite the patches that you don´t want to save...
11-27-2009 01:30 PM
One of the biggest failures in the design of the DSS-1 IMHO was the fact that when you powered it on, it didn't have a default set of waveforms and a program loaded. The one thing I'd like to see in this upgrade process is to be able to turn it on to a bank of my choice preloaded with the needed waveforms.
My preference would be all 16 DW-8000 waveforms.
11-27-2009 01:47 PM
:cry: I've read the whole thread since the beginning and I somehow missed that. That's really sad because I STARTED this damn thread! From what I remember, the DWGS waveforms that were in the DW-8000 were different from the DSS-1 waveforms. But Juno, if you still have any/all of those waveforms, please PM me. I can't wait to get this upgrade! -Mc
You haven't been paying attention. oke:
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
11-27-2009 02:21 PM
I can't wait to get this upgrade!
11-27-2009 02:38 PM
I assume you mean DW-8000, well yes they are different, since the DW-8000 only has an 8-bit waveform generation engine and the DSS-1 is 12 bit, but they are equivalent, as in the same basic waveform shape or harmonic content.
Well, what are you waiting for??? :rolleyes:
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
11-27-2009 04:02 PM
this:
"A complete redesign is in progress, which will make more use of programmable logic, which translates to a smaller board and lower cost."
11-27-2009 04:19 PM
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
11-28-2009 12:10 AM
:facepalm: I knew Tom worded that wrong. It should say: "Hurry up and buy this, since I only got 25 boards made, and some of the parts are getting hard to find, so when these sell out, it will take a long time to redo the board layout with more programmable logic, plus I have to wait for Jim to re-write the software to support the new floppy interface, and he can be slow at times. :rolleyes:"
-Jim
11-28-2009 05:10 AM
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
12-02-2009 10:12 AM
I´ll let you decide whether my suggestion have any benefit or not, and I´d like to hear your opinion on the examples I´m posting here. It was made with an hybrid synth, an Ensoniq ESQm, and the oscillators are digital, but it lets you choose if you want them to always start from the same point (as on the DSS-1), or you want them to be free-running. For some reason I couldn´t put them on my twango page, so I had to upload them on rapidshare. EXAMPLE 1 EXAMPLE 2 first half is free running, second half is static. I´d like to hear other opinions as well. I think it worth to include this function on the DSS...
What is the benefit of having free-running DCO or PCM oscillators anyway? I figured only VCOs are beneficial in this respect, because the voltage level is always fluctuating. What's the benefit in doing this on a static PCM waveforms? I owned a DW8000 for 20 years and the DSS1 for 6 years, with 3 yrs overlap between the two. I never thought the DW had a more analog feel than the DSS; in fact it feels to me the other way around; the DSS seems capable of a lot fatter, warmer and organic type sounds.
12-24-2009 01:57 PM
12-24-2009 07:29 PM
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
01-01-2010 03:47 PM
01-01-2010 08:29 PM
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
01-02-2010 08:20 AM
01-02-2010 11:08 AM
I know CopyQM could read and write the floppy format, but I'd be curious if you could extract the individual files from a CopyQM image?
01-02-2010 11:18 AM
Hey Jim,
I was toying with a friend's Poly and thought of something I'd love to see on at least *ONE* of my synths:
CHORD MEMORY
It'd be nice to have an Arp as well
-Mc
01-02-2010 11:43 AM
I'll let Tom address the availability, but I can answer the rest. The 'new revision' is not done yet. The SCSI option includes the SCSI interface IC, the cabling, and the punching/mounting of the DB25 connector. That interface is a carry over from the original DSS-MSRK retrofit that I did for Korg, so it is just SCSI-1 and the file system is an extension of the floppy routines (FAT 32 did not exist at the time). Like the floppy, it is a flat file system (no sub-directories). It supports 99 systems (of 32 programs each). You do get the option to select the target device (0-7). The USB interface is new, and offers FAT 16 or FAT 32 support, plus unlimited named system files (of 128 programs each) and sub-directories. I really don't know why anyone would use SCSI now, unless they had the original upgrade with a lot of data on a SCSI drive that they wanted to access. The USB interface is just as fast (sometimes faster) than the SCSI interface. -Jim
Tom, Thanks for your work on this. What is the current availability for the kit? Are they the original or the 'new revision' version you talk about on your site? A few questions on the SCSI option. The option is for the SCSI cabling and the punching/mounting of the DB25 connector, right? What SCSI protocol is supported? (SCSI-1, fast?, fast-wide?) If you connect multiple SCSI drives, is there a menu option to select the active target? Do you just format the SCSI drives as FAT32? Regards, --Doug
01-02-2010 01:44 PM
Please explain how CHORD MEMORY works, and how would you control it?
An Arp would probably require a change to CPU-2 code. That probably won't happen.
-Jim
Footfall wrote:What you're experiencing with these units is the result of our warehouse crew intentionally "overpacking" this product.
About HCHarmonyCentral.com is the leading Internet resource for musicians, supplying valuable information from news and product reviews, to classified ads and chat rooms.
Advertise on HC