Reply
Super Contributor
Jimmy James
Posts: 54,744
Registered: ‎02-24-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Actionsquid wrote:

 sonic versatility be damned.

 


So you're kinda missing the whole point of having a superior instrument, huh?

Yer Blues wrote:

I am from the Beavis and Butthead generation.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Pine Apple Slim
Posts: 8,294
Registered: ‎01-07-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Even tho I picked the 335, I disagree that a tele is not as versatile. Theres a lot of tones in a reg ole Tele besides icepick country twang on the back pup. From a good jazz tone on the front pup to lots of variation in the middle position. With good pickups in either, I think theres as many good sounds in one as the other.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
dudeman1967
Posts: 4,937
Registered: ‎01-10-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

335 without hesitation
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Pine Apple Slim
Posts: 8,294
Registered: ‎01-07-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Deathmatch? Cant believe I missed that. Anybody know a Tele can pulverize a 335 in one fell swoop.
Please use plain text.
Moderator
Actionsquid
Posts: 32,855
Registered: ‎03-29-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Jimmy James wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


I always forget that.  Most guitar players are pretty single minded in the sounds they like.  I guess I like too much stuff.  All my guitars can do more than one thing.  I have a superstrat that does great funk and jazzy stuff in addition to shred.


I find it more satisfying to really dig into a more limited range of sounds than to try to go after a whole bunch I guess.

 

That said I think a good S/S Tele can be more versitaile than you seem to suggest in this thread. Given quality pickups, electronics, and amp, you can really do a lot with a reguar Tele.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Jimmy James
Posts: 54,744
Registered: ‎02-24-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


I always forget that.  Most guitar players are pretty single minded in the sounds they like.  I guess I like too much stuff.  All my guitars can do more than one thing.  I have a superstrat that does great funk and jazzy stuff in addition to shred.


I find it more satisfying to really dig into a more limited range of sounds than to try to go after a whole bunch I guess.

 

That said I think a good S/S Tele can be more versitaile than you seem to suggest in this thread. Given quality pickups, electronics, and amp, you can really do a lot with a reguar Tele.


I didn't say a tele wasn't versatile.  I said a 335 is more versatile.

Yer Blues wrote:

I am from the Beavis and Butthead generation.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
cx04332
Posts: 2,912
Registered: ‎12-04-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

As far as gigging goes, a Tele is superior. With a good amp, it can cover almost all the needed tones. It can fall over, have food and drink spilled on it. deal with temperature extremes and still deliver. If a 335 falls over or gets food and drink spilled on it, the gig is over and you are off the luthier, wallet in hand.

Leo hit a grand slam home run with the design of the Tele. A Tele is one less thing to worry about on a gig. 

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Into Nation
Posts: 6,656
Registered: ‎03-25-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


cx04332 wrote:

As far as gigging goes, a Tele is superior. With a good amp, it can cover almost all the needed tones. It can fall over, have food and drink spilled on it. deal with temperature extremes and still deliver. If a 335 falls over or gets food and drink spilled on it, the gig is over and you are off the luthier, wallet in hand.

Leo hit a grand slam home run with the design of the Tele. A Tele is one less thing to worry about on a gig

 

Au Contraire


 

http://www.harmonycentral.com/t5/Electric-Guitars/I-smeared-bacon-fat-on-my-strat-now-it-stinks/td-p/16697195
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Red Ant
Posts: 22,305
Registered: ‎05-19-2003

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Jimmy James wrote:

I didn't say a tele wasn't versatile.  I said a 335 is more versatile.


I actually don't think a 335 is all that versatile... unless equipped with a Vari-Tone.

Quote Originally Posted by Vaclav Havel

Keep the company of those who seek the truth, and run from those who have found it.
Quote Originally Posted by Carl Sagan

The Universe is unimaginably vast. For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.
Quote Originally Posted by Joseph Brodsky

Life - the way it really is - is a battle not between Bad and Good but between Bad and Worse.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Jimmy James
Posts: 54,744
Registered: ‎02-24-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Red Ant wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

I didn't say a tele wasn't versatile.  I said a 335 is more versatile.


I actually don't think a 335 is all that versatile... unless equipped with a Vari-Tone.


I get a lot out of the in between positions on the toggle switch in conjunction with the volume and tone controls.

Yer Blues wrote:

I am from the Beavis and Butthead generation.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Red Ant
Posts: 22,305
Registered: ‎05-19-2003

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Jimmy James wrote:

I get a lot out of the in between positions on the toggle switch in conjunction with the volume and tone controls.


Yeah, that's definitely where the magic happens on a 335. Too much work for me though. You know my style - strat, neck pickup, volume knob :smileywink:

Quote Originally Posted by Vaclav Havel

Keep the company of those who seek the truth, and run from those who have found it.
Quote Originally Posted by Carl Sagan

The Universe is unimaginably vast. For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.
Quote Originally Posted by Joseph Brodsky

Life - the way it really is - is a battle not between Bad and Good but between Bad and Worse.
Please use plain text.
Moderator
Actionsquid
Posts: 32,855
Registered: ‎03-29-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


cx04332 wrote:

As far as gigging goes, a Tele is superior. With a good amp, it can cover almost all the needed tones. It can fall over, have food and drink spilled on it. deal with temperature extremes and still deliver. If a 335 falls over or gets food and drink spilled on it, the gig is over and you are off the luthier, wallet in hand.

Leo hit a grand slam home run with the design of the Tele. A Tele is one less thing to worry about on a gig. 


Yeah... I've had a number of guitars come and go over the years but my Tele is the one I never even consider trading or selling. It's not always the most sexy and exciting guitar, but as a dependable, reliable tool I couldn't ask for better.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 17,017
Registered: ‎08-18-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

I agree with this, though I would choose a tele. I have owned both and still have a semi along with my tele and personally I find it easier to take a tele in different tonal directions. For instance I find it easier to thicken the sound of the tele and get a good sound than to get a satisfactory bright/thin sound from a 335. I guess that's down to personal preference


Pine Apple Slim wrote:
Even tho I picked the 335, I disagree that a tele is not as versatile. Theres a lot of tones in a reg ole Tele besides icepick country twang on the back pup. From a good jazz tone on the front pup to lots of variation in the middle position. With good pickups in either, I think theres as many good sounds in one as the other.

 

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 8,019
Registered: ‎08-21-2007

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

I don't think I've ever played a 335 or a knock off of a 335.  I'd like to, one day.

Quote Originally Posted by Django Sentenza View Post
If the guys from Poison and Def Leppard like it, it must be good!
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
derivicus
Posts: 16,798
Registered: ‎09-15-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

335 for me.

Please use plain text.