Reply
Super Contributor
wallywanker
Posts: 1,839
Registered: ‎05-18-2003

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

too hard to decide...so i got a couple of each...  i like a little tele snap in the morning through the drri or tweaker, but later as the evening comes on and the wine bottle empties i find myself gravitating to the 335 through the marshall or sovtek.  after years of extensive research, and countless bottles of wine, i have come to the conclusion that it's all good...

`No there are no other options. No there is not a poll. Focus.' 

pfffttt...

"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein

"A nation of sheep will beget a government of wolves." - Edward R. Murrow

"Doh!" - Homer Simpson

listen to our music and leave your scathing comments here ...

when i was young(er) than now ...
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 7,285
Registered: ‎12-02-2006

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Strat.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Good Clean Fun
Posts: 367
Registered: ‎01-17-2013

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


clay sails wrote:
Strat.

Strats are kinda curvy/feminine looking.  Might be gay.  Book of golf jokes instead.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Pine Apple Slim
Posts: 8,294
Registered: ‎01-07-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Tough one. My 2 favorite guitars. I've been a Gibson man much longer than Tele slinger, so I guess I'd have to take the 335.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
rickenvox
Posts: 19,250
Registered: ‎09-12-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Own both but if I had to choose it would be the 335. And I disagree with JJ, 335 doesn't really do a tele sound.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 2,915
Registered: ‎08-19-2006

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

An easy choice; the Telecaster.

"Me and a book is a party. Me and a book and a cup of coffee is an orgy."
- Robert Fripp
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Jimmy James
Posts: 54,748
Registered: ‎02-24-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


rickenvox wrote:
Own both but if I had to choose it would be the 335. And I disagree with JJ, 335 doesn't really do a tele sound.

Not dead on but you can fake it.  You can't make a Tele sound like a 335.

Yer Blues wrote:

I am from the Beavis and Butthead generation.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 7,285
Registered: ‎12-02-2006

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Its all in the fingers.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 23,188
Registered: ‎10-13-2003

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Out of those two, I would go with the 335. But honestly, electric guitars are toss and best avoided.
Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Monson
Posts: 14,096
Registered: ‎08-27-2006

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

I'd get that 335 on the pic, sell it and buy two good Teles and a Casino or one good Tele and a 330.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 4,145
Registered: ‎01-04-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Stock?

 

The more versatile choice is the 335.

"Be regular and orderly in your life so that you may be violent and original in your work" - Gustave Flaubert
Please use plain text.
Moderator
Actionsquid
Posts: 32,856
Registered: ‎03-29-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.

Please use plain text.
Moderator
Actionsquid
Posts: 32,856
Registered: ‎03-29-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

Anyhow, although the 335 is a badass guitar and one of my favorite things from Gibson's line, I just connect more with the sound and feel of Teles. I'm going with Tele, not because it's "better", but just becauseof my history and how/what I play.

If I didn't place any importance on having a vibrato bridge (which I do), I think if I had a really good specimen of each I could be pretty happy not having any other guitars...

 

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 4,145
Registered: ‎01-04-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


Should be. OP said deathmatch. Do you want to go into the ring with good stand up, or with good stand up AND good ground and pound? All around wins in a deathmatch. It's a deathmatch, squid. Please pay attention. I know the changeover has been hard on you.

 

Are you ok?

"Be regular and orderly in your life so that you may be violent and original in your work" - Gustave Flaubert
Please use plain text.
Valued Contributor
fanuvbrak
Posts: 30,877
Registered: ‎02-04-2005

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


3shiftgtr wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


Should be. OP said deathmatch. Do you want to go into the ring with good stand up, or with good stand up AND good ground and pound? All around wins in a deathmatch. It's a deathmatch, squid. Please pay attention. I know the changeover has been hard on you.

 

Are you ok?


You're a real stickler for thread titles.

 

www.kingsofthedrink.com

Quote Originally Posted by Prages
I think everyone in the world has been lonely at some point in their life...and most of them could have probably written a more betterest song about it.
Quote Originally Posted by tiger roach
Once my mom told me not to go outside because there was a bird fight going on. I thought, "Bird fight, WTF? She can't really think I would fall for that crap." So I went outside anyway and a bird pecked me on the head.
Quote Originally Posted by gennation View Post
Negatory, even dressed as a man I'm more of a man than you.
Please use plain text.
Moderator
Actionsquid
Posts: 32,856
Registered: ‎03-29-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

[ Edited ]

3shiftgtr wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


Should be. OP said deathmatch. Do you want to go into the ring with good stand up, or with good stand up AND good ground and pound? All around wins in a deathmatch. It's a deathmatch, squid. Please pay attention. I know the changeover has been hard on you.

 

Are you ok?


 

 

If we're taking the term "deathmatch" so literally, then I'm going to double down on my Tele choice, because it would clearly make the superior weapon, sonic versatility be damned.

 

I took "deathmatch" as a deathmatch in my heart, in which a 335 could certainly be a contender but the Tele wins.

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Posts: 4,145
Registered: ‎01-04-2008

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Actionsquid wrote:

3shiftgtr wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


Should be. OP said deathmatch. Do you want to go into the ring with good stand up, or with good stand up AND good ground and pound? All around wins in a deathmatch. It's a deathmatch, squid. Please pay attention. I know the changeover has been hard on you.

 

Are you ok?


 

 

If we're taking the term "deathmatch" so literally, then I'm going to double down on my Tele choice, because it would clearly make the superior weapon, sonic versatility be damned.

 

I took "deathmatch" as a deathmatch in my heart, in which a 335 could certainly be a contender but the Tele wins.


Well, I guess deathmatch in real life I'd have to take the tele cuz it's a solid body and would hurt more if you hit some one upside the head with it.

 

But we play music with our guitars, so you can choose to be thin, wiry and telecaster-y like olive oyl, or round, suclent and 335 ish like Angelina Jolie's lips. Your choice.

 

Can you now see why I'm worried about you?

"Be regular and orderly in your life so that you may be violent and original in your work" - Gustave Flaubert
Please use plain text.
Moderator
Actionsquid
Posts: 32,856
Registered: ‎03-29-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335

[ Edited ]

3shiftgtr wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

3shiftgtr wrote:

Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


Should be. OP said deathmatch. Do you want to go into the ring with good stand up, or with good stand up AND good ground and pound? All around wins in a deathmatch. It's a deathmatch, squid. Please pay attention. I know the changeover has been hard on you.

 

Are you ok?


 

 

If we're taking the term "deathmatch" so literally, then I'm going to double down on my Tele choice, because it would clearly make the superior weapon, sonic versatility be damned.

 

I took "deathmatch" as a deathmatch in my heart, in which a 335 could certainly be a contender but the Tele wins.


Well, I guess deathmatch in real life I'd have to take the tele cuz it's a solid body and would hurt more if you hit some one upside the head with it.

 

But we play music with our guitars, so you can choose to be thin, wiry and telecaster-y like olive oyl, or round, suclent and 335 ish like Angelina Jolie's lips. Your choice.

 

Can you now see why I'm worried about you?


I'm a thin, wiry guy who most of the time likes thin, wiry sounds

BTW if you add a four way siwtch with a spot for the pickups in series (I have done this with mine), while your Tele isn't going to sound like a 335, you're going to get into some beefier territory while still sounding single-coil-ey. It's a modification I heartily endorse- I like having that sound available, even though I don't use it a ton.

Angelina Jolie looks a little scary TBH.

 

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Monson
Posts: 14,096
Registered: ‎08-27-2006

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Phlat Phive wrote:
But honestly, electric guitars are toss and best avoided.

 

"Silly boyish amusement. I've given that up long ago. Sheer waste of
time, that's what it is. It makes me downright sorry to see you fellows, who
ought to know better, spending all your energies in that aimless manner. No,
I've discovered the real thing, the only genuine occupation for a life time. I
propose to devote the remainder of mine to it, and can only regret the wasted
years that lie behind me, squandered in trivialities."

:smileywink:

Please use plain text.
Super Contributor
Jimmy James
Posts: 54,748
Registered: ‎02-24-2001

Re: Fender Telecaster vs. Gibson 335


Actionsquid wrote:

Jimmy James wrote:

With a little creativity you get that sharp Tele sound with the way you dial in a 335 and the right amp, but a Tele can't do a 335 and has none of the sonic range. You guys are stuck with the image thing without ever having done any experimentation.  A 335 is way more versatile.  Maybe not as comfortable to wear on stage, but a lot more versatile.

Hope this helps.


Versatility isn't everyone's top priority, though.


I always forget that.  Most guitar players are pretty single minded in the sounds they like.  I guess I like too much stuff.  All my guitars can do more than one thing.  I have a superstrat that does great funk and jazzy stuff in addition to shred.

Yer Blues wrote:

I am from the Beavis and Butthead generation.
Please use plain text.