jjdugan3

The 4MS Atoner. Like new/very good condition w/ instruction sheet. Barely used, not what I needed. I just want to recoup my cost,$180.00 shipped. Not interested in trades at this point. Thanks, John

oops- sorry- i forget sometimes that I am posting from outside your spacetime manifold so sometimes my replies appear before the post I am replying to- my bad Nicely played. I was twitchy on the delete button and spouting platitudes.

The divisiveness and the references to "the other America" disheartened me to no end. I for one don't want to perpetuate the divisiveness I found so ugly.My cynicism is still high,but it has to start somewhere.Rubbing the losers nose in it is no way to move forward.

You brought the funny, Dual.

I knew we could get this into non-sequitur territory.

We need the special glasses? Spinoza was a lens grinder.

ok: http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9904050 and also http://www.simulation-argument.com/simulation.html I don't think many of you realize that these ideas are coming from a large group of scientists- not just one pot-head posting on KSS When do we get to introduce Wittgenstein into this?

"Thee Awful Invokation of Tzeentch,"told me,"I believe there is something out there watching us. Unfortunately, it's the government."

"we can even CALCULATE the distribution of Gods per/galaxy" That's great!...not to be impertinent,is there an equation variable that includes all the Gods opinions on abortion in the cosmological multiverse?

If abortion is outlawed, I'm buying stock in whatever company makes wire coat hangers. Joan Crawford llc. jcl on the ticker.

My real fear is Fred Armisen doing Obama for 4 years.

Call me whatever you want. It's not a nuance, it's deciding whether something is a crime or not. If I didn't think it was criminal, your point of view would be acceptable. But since I believe it's criminal, of course your point of view, to me, is unacceptable. akliner's point is like saying stealing should be legal because you should have the right to decide whether to steal or not, and me wanting to prohibit theft is offending the rights of thieves. You guys just don't get it, it's really simple. But I guess it's easier to call me names than to consider something so logical but so against your agenda. It's a simple matter of taking away rights concerning those who disagree with you.We fundamentally disagree,don't legislate your preference for a lack of choice on me. Same issue with civil unions,denying citizens a right based upon religious conceit. As someone pointed out,the whole abortion issue is a convenient smokescreen/red herring trotted out every 4 years to obscure the real issues at hand.

I'm not dodging any question. Let me make it simpler for you: 1.You believe abortion is wrong. With my legislation, you don't have to get one. You are free to believe abortion is wrong and a disgusting waste of life that God gives each and every one of us. 2.I believe choice is right. With your legislation, nobody can get one ever. Ever. Because of YOUR PERSONAL BELIEFS, nobody can ever have an abortion...regardless of how THEY feel. These nuances are lost on the self-righteous,why bother.

But could you listen to Foetus all day long if you wanted to? I have,as well as Wiseblood...Lydia not so much. Foetus had great album covers,hadn't looked at them in a long time.

Karl Rove has predicted an Obama landslide. What time will McCain concede? Hopefully the Fundies and Neo-cons will go back to their divisive dark corners and consign themselves to the ash heap of history. Btw...the Bible literally states life begins at the first breath,since we all know the Bible is literal.Genesis 2:7