So wades makes claims without sources, they get rebuttal by multiple people (some with links etc) and then wades says people aren't citing stuff and basically aren't worth anything?
Just trying to get it clear here.
I wish you the best of luck with that:thu:
I don't want to talk to you no more, you empty headed animal food trough whopper! I fart in your general direction! You mother was a hamster and your father smelt of eldeberries.