mintparasol

Another point to consider is that the slight benefit you might get from tracking/mixing at 48 will probably be outweighed by the problems inherent in the resampling process if you're mastering yourself. Your sweet sounding mix at 48 may or may not sound the same when resampled to 44.1 on your own system. Do a few tests before you make up your mind....

Originally posted by G-Sun .. and my qustion: What is the pro and con for 48kHz vs. 44kHz? I've been looking around the forum and didn't find much on this subject. My final format is CD 44kHz. (Should I start a new tread on this?) Anyone? If you're mastering to 44.1 it makes no sense to use 48 for tracking and mixing. Use 44.1. The difference in audio quality is imperceptible and your waveforms will go to disc without having to be resampled at the lower rate. Use 44.1/24 bit and dither to 16 bit when mastering