Cool, thanks guys. Yeah, by not pretty... I just meant that it didn't have a crazy flamed maple top or anything.
So, is it a mahogany body with a mahogany top? Or is it a solid chunk of wood?
Also,the neck doesn't seem quite as thin as the later 90s classic I owned... but I'm not sure. It's been a while since I owned that guitar. Did the necks change or are they all the 60's neck?
I think they're solid mahogany but not 100% sure (Mike Sublowski at the LP forum would know he has a bunch) I've owned a bunch of regular classics from 90-92 and all had the slimmest necks I've ever played on a Gibson. The carve on the 60s necks has changed considerably over the years, but yours is probably different just being a custom shop. I know the historic 60s neck is fatter than the Gibson USA.
*edit- You know after looking at yours I don't think it's a 90 (which would explain the fatter neck) The color of the inlays and Classic screened on the headstock looks to be mid 90s. They may have done the serial numbers like the historics where the "0" represents the 60 reissue which would make the next digit the year of manufacture (95).