Jump to content

wwwjd

Members
  • Posts

    3,281
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Location
    West Des Moines, IA, USA

wwwjd's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post Rare
  • Collaborator Rare
  • Posting Machine Rare
  • Week One Done Rare
  • One Month Later Rare

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I used to be regular, long ago. Basically, I bailed when the forum style changed into the crazy large sized thing that it is. too frustrating to bother with, a horrible layout I'd never seen before, or since this. Just wasn't worth surfing her. Just stopped in to see if it was still around.
  2. in the end, who cares since 99.999 percet of people can't tell the difference. are we recording ONLY for that .001% ? I doubt it.
  3. I remember back in the day when studios did not have access to analyzers... sure is nice to move forward where they are available free for everyone to download and use. If I was set in my ways, I'd probably be against it, but NOWDAYS, they fit in with the rest of the helpful tools available to anyone interested.
  4. dija try this freebie yet? It has 3 bands compression, exciter, limiter, widener and does a good job when dialed in. you will be surprised. http://www.jeroenbreebaart.com/audio_vst.htm#broadcast try it first before you spend anything. Just set it on normal or default and you will have your level up. push more into it, teh more crunch you get without busting over zero. read the PDF maunal it's like two pages and explains the weird settings. set the output to -.1 or -.2 to avoid intersample issues on DA converters - at least in my expeiments Yes, it is not on the level of OZONE, but it will get what you want
  5. Tell him if his is not interested in buying them, then he is irrelevent and to move along. Another answer could be There will always be better and worse monitors for everybody. I am selling THESE monitors.
  6. EQ, Limiting, and sometimes widening. I like OZONE too. try this plugin for starters, for free. get the manual and read it http://www.jeroenbreebaart.com/audio_vst.htm#broadcast Izotope also has a great GUIDE for mastering. http://izotope.com/products/audio/ozone/guides.html
  7. I feel the ugly side of what is better tween ANALOG and digital is that analog adds stuff, smears stuff, degrades stuff, drops stuff. I NEVER saw that as a good thing, ever. Maybe it's 100% on 1 pass, then goes down from there, after 10 rolls it's off by 92% [just guessing], when I use digital, it's 100% for ever [at least in my experience]. With digital I can ALWAYS pass it through analog stuff to change the tone, if I wanted to, but I can never recover that stuff lost on analog. And don't get me started on NOISE REDUCTION systems. GAH!
  8. you guys still on about this?? hasn't it been done to death in previous threads? None of it matters if the SONG is no good to begin with. I'd rather write interesting music than have "PERFECT" recordings None of the playback mediums and environments are perfect either anyway, so it doesn't matter in the end
  9. That's all well and good but you're showing 11 or 12 samples per cycle there for a 20kHz waveform in 44.1kHz and that's just not correct. Could you redraw it showing what happens to a 20kHz square waveform when you sample it at 44.1kHz? According to other posters who were arguing with me, it should come out sinusoidal. I had it all arse-backwards earlier on in the thread but now I know I'm 100% correct. just an example, not draw to accurate scale with my free-handing in Paint made to show what comes out the D>A side sonically, in the end. Same thing
  10. here's my visual for viewers: (ignore the obvious sub par drawing and binary representation errors)
  11. so 44.1 produces unlistenable square waves? Can I get a refund for all these CDs?? I hate finding what I been listening too all these years was unlistenable!
  12. The number of times out of 554 that the listeners correctly identified which system was which was 276, or 49.82 percent
  13. they are not actually "Christians", any more than a white urban kid with rich parents is "Gangsta" because he SAYS he is and dresses like one. They are simply abusing a name for class sake or whatever their issues are. Actual, true, practicing Christians are not like that. It's like if I said, "I am a bass player" and you believed me, then listened to my inability to play any bass at all.... well, I'm not REALLY a bass player am I, even though I CLAIMED the name. s I am sure has already been pointed out, their issues with "Pro" stem deeply elsewhere and lack of applicable knowledge.
  14. ah ha, Jedi Console Warrior... but, alas, I am the anal one and have worked out every last nuance of emotion I desire in the vocals from when to add the "T"'s, or the facial expression heard in the mic on the chorus... so, I'll be producing from the microphone muwahahahhahahaha! But you are welcome to try
×
×
  • Create New...