Members Bullettoothtony Posted October 16, 2012 Members Share Posted October 16, 2012 For anyone who hasn't already seen this, I thought I'd share it. REALLY interesting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members knockwood Posted October 16, 2012 Members Share Posted October 16, 2012 Awesome vid. Makes me want to run out and steal several Martins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Bullettoothtony Posted October 16, 2012 Author Members Share Posted October 16, 2012 Hey! Not a bad idea...wonder what the security is like at CFM.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members knockwood Posted October 16, 2012 Members Share Posted October 16, 2012 Originally Posted by Bullettoothtony Hey! Not a bad idea...wonder what the security is like at CFM.... Pretty decent, I'd expect. And they have all that glass in front of the most interesting stuff. I was thinking of stealing locally. I generally prefer to buy, but who has the money for that?Seriously, one little bit that caught my ear was CFM's praise of his ancestor for coming up with a "simple, elegant" headstock design. Martin's headstock shape is so ubiquitous now, so much the standard, that I'd bet very few people tend to think of it as a "design." But it really is, IMHO, an accomplishment and a giant aesthetic element of Martin guitars. One thing I've noticed about {censored}ty guitars is that they almost universally have bat{censored} headstock designs. For me, as an inexperienced but enthusiastic tinkerer, coming up with a headstock design that is at once original and attractive has proven surprisingly difficult. I'm still chasing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Bullettoothtony Posted October 16, 2012 Author Members Share Posted October 16, 2012 Originally Posted by knockwood Pretty decent, I'd expect. And they have all that glass in front of the most interesting stuff. I was thinking of stealing locally. I generally prefer to buy, but who has the money for that?Seriously, one little bit that caught my ear was CFM's praise of his ancestor for coming up with a "simple, elegant" headstock design. Martin's headstock shape is so ubiquitous now, so much the standard, that I'd bet very few people tend to think of it as a "design." But it really is, IMHO, an accomplishment and a giant aesthetic element of Martin guitars. One thing I've noticed about {censored}ty guitars is that they almost universally have bat{censored} headstock designs. For me, as an inexperienced but enthusiastic tinkerer, coming up with a headstock design that is at once original and attractive has proven surprisingly difficult. I'm still chasing it. I agree. Some headstock designs are just atrocious. As I learn more and more about Martin (and guitars in general) , probably stuff most of you guys knew already, the more my respect for the company grows. The plain fact is this - the 'guitar' as we know it today, did not exist before Martin. X-bracing, headstock shapes, body shapes..they wrote the book on alot of it. Pretty impressive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.