Jump to content

Your favorite PAF Bucker for a Les Paul and why?


billybilly

Your favorite PAF Bucker for a Les Paul and why?  

18 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favorite PAF Bucker for a Les Paul and why?

    • Burstbuckers... Pro or otherwise
      5
    • Gibson 57 Classics
      3
    • Seymour Duncan Antiquities
      2
    • Seymour Duncan Alnico II Pro
      0
    • Dimarzio 36th Anniversary
      0
    • Other?
      8


Recommended Posts

  • Members

I picked up a Les Paul this year with Burstbucker Pros, I love them but haven't experimented with some of the other, more common PAF Les Paul pickups. Feel free to mention others, but these are the ones frequently mentioned around the traps.

 

For the record, I like the Burstbucker Pros as they're a bit hairy, great for overdrive with an edge. My Les Paul does not have a maple cap so any brightness people sometimes talk about with the Burstbucker Pros is nullified. The cleans are good but not great due to the "hairy" nature of them.

 

You can vote for more than one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Very impressed with the Burstbucker Pros myself. The secret with those to avoid the brightness some complain about is to make sure they are the covered ones as opposed to open. The nickel covers really do a lot to tame the treble, without compromising the overall tone.

 

Also a big fan of S.D. 59s for the neck and JBs for the bridge position. Regarding JBs, they can be rather finicky depending on what guitar they are dropped into, but in the right guitar they can really sing.

 

Wished I knew what pickup came stock in my special order Studio Lite (2000 - non-manufacture year) because the neck is really extremely articulate almost single-coilish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My favorites that I've experienced would be the Burstbucker 1 & 2. To me those are classic without sounding overly bright. Complex chorus of sounds can be heard from the scatter wound design. But I do think they've got to have a decent build under them with some good resonance and coupling to bring out their best.

 

 

I don't like the burstbucker 3, because I usually don't play with that much gain, which IMO is the only place the BB-3 shines. I have that pickup in JJ Melody Maker, JB LP Studio and a BFG Studio and I can only reconcile with them when I have the gain up.

I like the BB Pros, but they are more mid sounding, i.e. kinda cranked, and extra vibey. Good for a guitar that needs to be woken up, but with a build that will provide it enough warmth for good balance. I put a set of BB Pros into an Epi G-400 Deluxe and that guitar just has a bit too much toppy sounding presence. I've left them in though, just to have an uber-cut-through-the-mix SG on hand. But I've got a double-cut LP Std with them that sounds real nice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

My favorite is the Seymour Duncan Seth Lover. Antiquities are the same pickup with aged magnets so I voted for that because it was the closest choice to vote for.

 

I like that they aren't wax potted and are asymmetrically scatter wound....They sound bright and clear like a single coil but moree full of harmonics and quiet like a humbucker should sound.

 

I HATE the sound of wax potted pickups. I know it kills feedback...but so does stuffing a $1,000 Neumann microphone under a pillow. What's the point?

 

And yes...Burstbuckers are potted. But they ARE asymmetrically wound.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members
My favorite is the Seymour Duncan Seth Lover. Antiquities are the same pickup with aged magnets so I voted for that because it was the closest choice to vote for.

 

I like that they aren't wax potted and are asymmetrically scatter wound....They sound bright and clear like a single coil but moree full of harmonics and quiet like a humbucker should sound.

 

^^^^ This right here ^^^^

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I had Burstbuckers in my '06 Les Paul. I found them to be too edgy. I switched to WCR Crossroads. They're bright but in a sweet vintage way. Low output compared to a lot of todays pups, I get my grit from my amp and I've gotten into using my tone AND volume knobs a LOT more these days. I have Wolfetone Dr. Vintage pups in my '91 PRS Artist. The PRS is a different animal than the Les Paul but the low output Wolfetones have a nice sweet top end and a piano-like clarity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rarely play Humbuckers but when I do: Gibson Classic 57's.

Solid, reliable, EXTREMLY good repro of a vintage Humbucker.

Important part...NOT "TOO HOT"......I love these pickups.

 

I have to agree - I really like the 57's a lot too. If I need something hotter, I can use a boost pedal, but I like how these pickups clean up when you need them to. They're close enough to the original PAFs to suit my preferences / needs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

Never been the biggest fan of the modern Gibson pickups. A little too much in the mid section for my ears. my main choice is a DiMarrizo DP107, called the Megadrive in the neck, and a Duncan Trembucker in the bridge. Yes, I know, they are high output, but with coil taps, and series/parallel wiring, I can get the toes I want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

I far and away prefer Gibson humbuckers over all other makers, after years of playing and experience. YMMV.

 

I have a 57 Classic in the neck of my LP, and that bitch just sings. Phenomenal with overdrive.

 

Bridge? My favorite so far is the BB Pro, though my LP has a BB3 in the bridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
Old greco pickups in my Greco Les Paul. Not a 100% sure what model they are. I like my 57 classic and SD Alnico Pro II in my Orville....quite a lot actually..... but the Greco's are better. The note separation on open chords under heavy distortion always blows my mind.

 

Most likely PU2s, got some in my Greco 335 and they are utterly glorious, just a magnet away from Dry Zs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Moderators
My favorite is the Seymour Duncan Seth Lover. Antiquities are the same pickup with aged magnets so I voted for that because it was the closest choice to vote for.

 

Yup off the shelf, Seth Lovers, which are only slightly different ( I can't hear it in every guitar, apart from my 335) from the SD Antiquities.

 

If I did go boutique these days, I'd only bother with WolfTone pickups, Dr Vs and Marshallheads and Jon Gundry's Throbaks, but I ain't paying Throbak prices.

 

I hear too much variation to actually buy BBs. I have an R7, in which they sound the best pickup in the world, yet in my recently acquired Memphis 335, they sound quite ordinary

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Members

 

Most likely PU2s, got some in my Greco 335 and they are utterly glorious, just a magnet away from Dry Zs

 

 

You know I don't think they are. It's a late 81 Super Real EGC1000 and those are suppose to have Dry Z's in them. But because it's such a late guitar there is a chance that it has some very early mint collection parts. In which case they would be fujigen made pickups. And the first year Mint collection 1000 customs had a pickups called "Groove", made only for one year.

 

They have no stamps on the back and no stickers as well.

 

There are a couple other cases over on the Tokai forum of people with this situation as well. Some say (as I thought at first) that they might be left over maxon dry z's that weren't stamped. But now I think that's unlikely. I think they are these "groove" pickups which either had the stickers (like fujigen did with the dry 82's) removed or they never had the stickers in the first place.

 

Regardless....it's a bit of a mystery that I'll probably never be able to answer 100%. All I know is they sound fantastic whatever they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...