Members Plato5v Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 I played a friend's 1965 Fender Mustang Guitar. Its neck was very thin and I liked it. I was wondering if any new guitars come with such thin necks. I currently play a Stratocaster with a C neck. I would appreciate any suggestions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members billybilly Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 The majority of newer guitars come with thin necks. Typically, guitars for shredding come with thin necks. The Ibanez Wizard is a good example. You can always buy a thin neck from Warmoth if you're putting it on a fender or other bolt on neck. The Classic Vibe Asian Fenders have thin necks. Good bang for buck. For what it's worth, I can't stand them. Hard to find a thick neck these days. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Townshend Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 I'm with you billybilly. Give me a baseball bat! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members knotty Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 I never understood why neck shape has not been more than a feel issue in electrics. For classical they would measure your hand and find a guitar that ''fitted''. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gardo Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 My Squier has a narrow neck . I love the guitar but not so much the neck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Plato5v Posted August 8, 2014 Author Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 Thanks for all the comments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Danhedonia Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 Many Danolectros also have thinner neck profiles, if you prefer a different / more throwback look. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members badpenguin Posted August 8, 2014 Members Share Posted August 8, 2014 Plato, are we talking thin or narrow? Thin, meaning the thickness of the neck from the fretboard to the point your hand is, or narrow, meaning the distance from the two 'E' strings.And didn't the Mustang have a shorter scale, like the Duo Sonic?And me myself and I, have always preferred neck with some meat to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members iamjethro Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 The old Peavey T-60's had really thin necks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members speakerjones Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 Judging from experience with old Fender short scale offsets, the OP means a narrow neck, not thin. There were 2 neck widths on those guitars. A and B widths. The A is pretty narrow, but still chunky in depth. I find them pretty comfortable myself, and lots of fun to play. In my journeys, I have not found a modern guitar with that shape to the neck. Rickenbackers are close, but feel different, perhaps due to scale length. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members V-8 Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 Thin necks = Fat necks = Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AJ6stringsting Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 I own a Kramer Knight Swan from 1988, 24 frets and a very thin neck. Best neck, I've ever played on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members onelife Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 1966 Gibson ES-335TD with "pencil neck" as I one heard it referred to as Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members guitarcapo Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 I have Carvins with thin necks that are easy to play....but they need truss rod adjustments every year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members Plato5v Posted August 9, 2014 Author Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 I guess I should have been more specific. The Mustang had a very thin and narrow neck. It was narrower than any guitar I have ever seen. I have played some of the Squires and this was significantly narrower than them. It was almost like it was made for a child. Also, they do have a shorter scale. I appreciate all the replies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members badpenguin Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 Ok, I thought so..... they were a 24" or something like that. I would suggest a Peavy Patriot, or the T-15. both were pretty narrow, with an interesting scale. The Fender Duo-Sonic is also a choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members peskypesky Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 how about a Fender Mustang?http://www.fender.com/guitars/mustang/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members peskypesky Posted August 9, 2014 Members Share Posted August 9, 2014 The Kurt Cobain model has the most narrow neck, according to nut width. [TABLE=class: table table-striped, width: 100%] [TR] [TD=width: 20%]Nut Width:[/TD] [TD=width: 80%]1.625" (41.3 mm)[/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] http://www.fender.com/guitars/mustang/kurt-cobain-mustang-rosewood-fingerboard-fiesta-red/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members speakerjones Posted August 10, 2014 Members Share Posted August 10, 2014 I can't speak for the Cobain Mustang, but all of the other modern Mustangs I've tried felt nothing like like the original ones to me. There are two that I play regularly, a 65 and 69. I assume they are both the narrower "A" width. For what they're getting for the Cobain models, you can probably find a players grade vintage Mustang or DuoSonic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members RGfretter Posted August 10, 2014 Members Share Posted August 10, 2014 Thin necks equal...confidence with preference Thick necks equal...lack of confidence also known as over-compensation. Preferring what you prefer w/o worry of criticism= musician. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members gardo Posted August 10, 2014 Members Share Posted August 10, 2014 Thin necks equal...confidence with preference Thick necks equal...lack of confidence also known as over-compensation. Preferring what you prefer w/o worry of criticism= musician. I can't argue with illogic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members badpenguin Posted August 10, 2014 Members Share Posted August 10, 2014 Thin necks equal...confidence with preference Thick necks equal...lack of confidence also known as over-compensation. Preferring what you prefer w/o worry of criticism= musician. Uh, wha? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 I guess I should have been more specific. The Mustang had a very thin and narrow neck. It was narrower than any guitar I have ever seen. I have played some of the Squires and this was significantly narrower than them. It was almost like it was made for a child. Also, they do have a shorter scale. I appreciate all the replies. Fender made four neck widths (measured across the fingerboard at the nut) back in the 60s. They were called A, B, C and D widths, and they were 1 1/2" (A), 1 5/8" (B), 1 3/4" ©, and 1 7/8" (D) wide. The B width was the "standard" width, and the one you're most likely to encounter... but quite a few Mustangs have the narrow A width necks; particularly on the shorter scale (22.5") necks. Mustangs also come in 24" scale length versions - these are far more common than the 22.5" scale necks, and the only ones still available on "new" Mustangs today. As far as I know, all of the current Mustang models have necks that are roughly 1.625" wide at the nut, which is comparable to the old B width necks. By the way, not all 60s era necks are thin from fingerboard to the back of the neck either - I have a vintage '65 Mustang neck that I purchased on Ebay with the intention of using it on a guitar project, but I never used it because it is very thick and has a U-shaped profile. I prefer thinner necks (from fingerboard to the back of the neck) in the .750-.800 thickness range, and with narrower "shoulders", so that it has more of a C or soft-v shaped profile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phil O'Keefe Posted August 11, 2014 Share Posted August 11, 2014 Thin necks = Fat necks = I resemble that remark... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Members AJ6stringsting Posted August 13, 2014 Members Share Posted August 13, 2014 LOL !!!!.... you look cool in the "Fro" !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.